Previous Section Index Home Page

28 Apr 2008 : Column 124W—continued

Written Questions: Government Responses

Mr. Garnier: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice when he plans to answer Question 196558, on the home detention curfew, tabled on 19th March 2008. [202312]

Mr. Straw: I replied to the hon. Member for Harborough's question on 24 April 2008, Official report, columns 2251-52W. I apologise for the delay.

Young Offender Institutions

Mr. Burrowes: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the (a) operational and (b) certified normal capacity is of each (i) young offender institution and (ii) secure training centre. [201647]

Mr. Hanson: The operational capacity and in use certified normal capacity for each young offender and juvenile(1) institution at the end of March 2008 is shown in table A. Young offenders held in adult categorised prisons are not included.


28 Apr 2008 : Column 125W

28 Apr 2008 : Column 126W
Table A
Prison Operational capacity In use certified normal accommodation

Aylesbury

444

437

Brinsford

497

473

Castington

410

400

Deerbolt

453

453

Feltham

762

762

Glen Parva

808

668

Hindley

523

523

Lancaster Farms

517

480

Northallerton

252

153

Portland

577

539

Reading

281

184

Rochester

392

392

Stoke Heath

678

562

Swinfen Hall

620

600

Thorn Cross

322

322

Ashfield(1)

400

400

Huntercombe(1)

365

360

Warren Hill(1)

222

222

Wennington(1)

162

160

Wetherby(1)

384

360


The Youth Justice Board does not express levels of accommodation in the requested format. The number of beds required to be made available by secure training centres is shown in table B.

Table B
Secure training centre Number of beds

Hassockfield

58

Medway

76

Oakhill

80

Rainsbrook

87


Mr. Burrowes: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the staff to inmate ratio of each (a) young offender institution and (b) secure training centre was at the latest date for which figures are available. [201648]

Mr. Hanson: The following table shows the overall staff to prisoner ratio and unified staff to prisoner ratio for each young offender and juvenile(1) institution at the end of March 2008. Young offenders held in adult categorised prisons are not included. Unified staff relates to those staff that are officer or governor grades.

Prison Prisoner population Total staff in post Total staff to prisoner ratio Total unified staff Unified staff to prisoner ratio

Aylesbury

442

327

1 : 1.35

193

1 : 2.29

Brinsford

442

431

1 : 1.03

257

1 : 1.72

Castington

375

383

1 : 0.98

235

1 : 1.60

Deerbolt

444

362

1 : 1.23

192

1 : 2.31

Feltham

587

779

1 : 0.75

421

1 : 1.39

Glen Parva

804

510

1 : 1.58

276

1 : 2.91

Hindley

497

429

1 : 1.16

244

1 : 2.04

Lancaster Farms

494

424

1 : 1.17

263

1 : 1.88

Northallerton

232

139

1 : 1.67

70

1 : 3.31

Portland

555

418

1 : 1.33

223

1 : 2.49

Reading

245

225

1 : 1.09

122

1 : 2.01

Rochester

389

328

1 : 1.19

197

1 : 1.97

Stoke Heath

644

473

1 : 1.36

264

1 : 2.44

Swinfen Hall

619

415

1 : 1.49

217

1 : 2.85

Thorn Cross

230

218

1 : 1.06

122

1 : 1.89

Huntercombe(1)

347

288

1 : 1.20

162

1 : 2.14

Warren Hill(1)

213

248

1 : 0.86

148

1 : 1.44

Werrington(1)

138

174

1 : 0.79

90

1 : 1.53

Wetherby(1)

321

336

1 : 0.96

185

1 : 1.74


Youth Justice Board do not set precise staff to prisoner ratios for secure training centres (STCs); instead, they agree with providers the minimum starting levels necessary to ensure effective supervision. Broadly speaking, the minimum staffing levels are three members of custody staff to young people living in a group of eight and two members of custody staff to young people living in a group of six.

The figures for prison establishments and STCs are not directly comparable. The figures for prisons relate to all staff employed in the establishment, while the ratio for STCs relates only to staff engaging directly with offenders.

Young Offender Institutions: Education

Mr. Burrowes: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what percentage of those in each (a) young offender institution and (b) secure training centre were in education at the latest date for which figures are available. [202023]

Mr. Hanson: The Prison Service does not centrally collate education data at prisoner level. The following table shows the provisional average number of hours spent in educational activity per week per prisoner in young offender and juvenile institutions in 2007-08. Young offenders held in prisons categorised as adult are not included.


28 Apr 2008 : Column 127W
Prison Average number of hours spent in educational activity

Aylesbury

10.2

Brinsford

11.0

Castington

11.8

Deerbolt

11.1

Feltham

10.9

Glen Parva

8.7

Hindley

17.3

Lancaster Farms

12.2

Northallerton

14.7

Portland

7.6

Reading

8.5

Rochester

6.0

Stoke Heath

10.3

Swinfen Hall

10.8

Ashfield

20.6

Huntercombe

16.9

Warren Hill

19.6

Werrington

26.0

Wetherby

15.6


Next Section Index Home Page