Previous Section Index Home Page

19 May 2008 : Column 32W—continued


19 May 2008 : Column 33W

Sea Rescue: Strikes

Mr. Carmichael: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what contingency arrangements were made by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency during each of the last three strikes by coastguards; and what further contingency arrangements have been identified as necessary in the event of a strike by coastguards lasting four days. [206588]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The UK’s maritime emergency response is provided by a co-operative partnership of Government Departments, emergency services and other organisations. During the three 24-hour periods of strike action by some Maritime and Coastguard Agency staff in March and April, the Agency worked with its partner organisations to maintain UK emergency response and search and rescue co-ordination capabilities. This was achieved by using a combination of well-rehearsed internal contingency measures (such as employing existing technology to ‘pair’ rescue co-ordination centres, where necessary), redeploying experienced managers, establishing a national strategic support centre and co-ordinating closely with other search and rescue operators. In addition, the Agency ensured that information about MCA services during the strike was widely disseminated to its customers.

The Agency will approach contingency planning for any future strike action by coastguards in a similar manner.

Mr. Carmichael: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many staff at each coastguard station participated in strike action in each strike affecting the Maritime and Coastguard Agency in the last five years. [206592]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The number of staff, by Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre, who have taken strike action in each strike affecting the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, in the last five years, is shown as follows:

Strike date
MRCC 6 March 2008 11 March 2008 23/24 April 2008

Portland

13

12

11

Solent

17

11

16

Dover

12

10

11

Thames

11

11

12

Yarmouth

9

8

9

Humber

8

7

12

Forth

10

3

4

Aberdeen

9

5

6

Shetland

0

0

0

Stornoway

6

5

2

Clyde

11

8

5

Belfast

11

11

2

Liverpool

13

10

4

Holyhead

14

11

7

Milford Haven

9

8

2

Swansea

14

8

12

Falmouth

12

11

0

Brixham

9

10

1

London

2

2

2

Total

190

151

118


19 May 2008 : Column 34W

Smoking

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many smoking shelters were built at each of her Department's London buildings in each of the last five years. [205037]

Jim Fitzpatrick: Two.

Travel: Concessions

Mr. Gray: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what the reason was for her issue of advice to local authorities on 14 February for them to order temporary concessionary travel passes; [206306]

(2) when she was first informed that Smartcard passes might not be ready by 1 April 2008; [206307]

(3) what the reasons are for the time taken to produce the Smartcard passes for the concessionary travel scheme; what assessment she has made of where responsibility for the delay to the time taken for production falls; and if she will make a statement; [206308]

(4) how many concessionary scheme bus passes have not been issued on the original timetable; and if she will make a statement. [206309]

Ms Rosie Winterton: Responsibility for issuing the concessionary travel passes rests with travel concession authorities, as it has done since 2000. When we made the decision last September to require the new concessionary travel passes to be in smartcard form we recognised this was a challenging requirement in the time available. This is why we put in place contingency arrangements, including allowing existing local passes to remain valid in the local area until 30 September, and providing authorities with temporary passes for people who wished to travel outside their local area.

Local authorities were advised to order sufficient temporary passes to ensure that anyone who was eligible for the England-wide concession was able to take advantage of it from 1 April even if they had not received their smartcard pass by then.

In fact, most local authorities and their suppliers were able to produce passes in time for the start of the concession. By 1 April, 95 per cent. of the anticipated passes had been produced. Unfortunately, while they had managed to produce the passes on time, we are aware that some suppliers experienced last minute problems in dispatching those passes to eligible people. Despite this, we estimate that around 4.8 million passes were dispatched by 1 April.

West Coast Railway Line

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 13 May 2008, Official Report, column 1433W, on the West Coast railway line, what contingency plans are in place should the implementation of the West Coast Main Line timetable due in December 2008 need to be delayed. [206590]

Mr. Tom Harris: The Government remain confident that Network Rail can deliver the December 2008 timetable changes on schedule. In the event that the
19 May 2008 : Column 35W
timetable was to be delayed, existing services would continue. However, the Department for Transport is aware of the changes that would need to be made to franchises and the impact of any delay on the delivery of other projects. These matters were carefully considered by the Secretary of State when she decided to support delivery of the December 2008 outputs on schedule.

Communities and Local Government

Carbon Monoxide: Alarms

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what advice the Housing Health and Safety Rating System provides on the use of carbon monoxide alarms. [203050]

Mr. Iain Wright: The Housing Health and Safety Rating System is a risk assessment tool used to assess potential risks to the health and safety of occupants in residential properties in England and Wales. Local authorities are responsible for operating the Housing Health and Safety Rating System.

The Housing Health and Safety Rating System assesses 29 categories of housing hazard; each hazard has a weighting which will help determine whether the property is rated as having Category 1 (serious) or Category 2 (other) hazards.

Within the 29 categories carbon monoxide and fuel combustion products are listed as hazards. Clearly exposure to high concentrations of carbon monoxide is a serious hazard and following discovery of such concentrations would lead to immediate action to address the situation. Communities and Local Government has issued operating guidance for local authorities. The guidance contains a number of preventative measures that may be taken including the use carbon monoxide detectors. The guidance can be viewed on the following link:

Community Development

Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many submissions she received in response to her consultation paper on the action plan for community empowerment; and when these representations will be published. [205596]

Mr. Dhanda: The Department for Communities and Local Government received 33 responses to the Community Empowerment Action Plan over the course of October 2007 to January 2008. These responses are being fed into the development of policy for the Community Empowerment White Paper which will be published this summer.

Departmental Official Hospitality

Mrs. May: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many receptions she has hosted and funded in her capacity as
19 May 2008 : Column 36W
Secretary of State in the last 12 months; which individuals and organisations (a) were invited to and (b) attended each reception; and what the cost was of each reception. [203841]

Hazel Blears: I will publish, in due course, an annual list providing information relating to official receptions hosted by Ministers in this Department during the previous financial year.

Departmental Translation Services

Mr. Paul Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much was spent on translation services into (a) Welsh and (b) other languages by her Department, associated agencies and non-departmental public bodies in (i) 2003-04, (ii) 2004-05, (iii) 2005-06, (iv) 2006-07 and (v) 2007-08. [203871]

Mr. Dhanda: The Department’s expenditure by financial year on translation services is as follows:

Financial year £

2003-04

114,191

2004-05

51,304

2005-06

61,319

2006-07

29,942

2007-08

61,329


Data to identify departmental expenditure on translation into (a) Welsh and (b) other languages are not held centrally and could be supplied only at disproportionate cost.

The Department’s agencies have supplied the following information on their expenditure on translations services.

£
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Planning Inspectorate

93,047

96,082

64,152

67,890

59,215

Fire Service College

75

30

QE2 Conference Centre


The Fire Service College can supply data for financial year 2006-07 and 2007-08. It could provide previous years’ expenditure only at disproportionate cost. Detailed expenditure on translation into (a) Welsh and (b) other languages could be supplied only at disproportionate cost.

Ordnance Survey could identify spend on translation services only at disproportionate cost.

Records of the expenditure on translation by non-departmental public bodies are not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Waste Disposal

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much waste produced by her Department was sent to landfill in each year since 1997. [206056]


19 May 2008 : Column 37W

John Healey: Communities and Local Government produced the following amounts of general waste (in tonnes):

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07

Communities and Local Government

253

310

204

203

197

Executive Agencies

(1)

(1)

1400

644

633

(1) Date not available in these years. Note: These data do not include information from the regional Government Office network.

Next Section Index Home Page