Previous Section Index Home Page

2 Jun 2008 : Column 538W—continued

Reviews resulting in (b) a lower band could apply at any time and are not linked to a “point of sale”.

Robert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what research (a) her Department and (b) its agencies have commissioned on council tax revaluation in the last 12 months from (i) within her Department and its agencies and (ii) external bodies. [207562]

John Healey: None.

Departmental Pay

Mr. Philip Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much was paid in end-of-year performance bonuses to (a) all staff and (b) staff at senior civil service level in (i) her Department and (ii) its agencies in the 2007-08 financial year; and how many payments were made. [207468]

Mr. Dhanda: The numbers of bonuses paid to all staff and the cost of these in the 2007-08 financial year are given in the following table:

Number of bonuses Cost of bonuses (£)

Senior civil servants (SCS)

104

686,000

All staff below SCS

391

332,350

Total

495

1,018,350


In Communities and Local Government, bonus payments are made to those members of staff who are found to have made a significant contribution towards the achievement of the teams, and/or Department’s objectives. Individuals are expected to show that they have exceeded the requirements set for the achievement of the objective and have demonstrated exemplary behaviour in doing so. Our senior civil service staff members are also assessed against a range of factors, such as:

Details of bonuses paid in the Department’s agencies is not held centrally.

Departmental Procurement

Robert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar of 15 May 2008, Official Report, column 1685W, on departmental procurement, when the purchase order department became operational; and whether the database covers expenditure by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. [207599]

Mr. Dhanda: All purchase orders raised by the Department and its predecessor, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister which was formed in May 2002, are recorded on the Department's financial system.

Robert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar of 15 May 2008, Official Report, column 1685W, on departmental procurement, what the financial trigger for a purchase order being required for expenditure is. [207600]

Mr. Dhanda: All purchase orders require prior financial approval from a budget holder.

Departmental Public Participation

Mrs. May: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what (a) surveys, (b) questionnaires and (c) other services were provided by polling companies for her Department in financial year 2007-08, broken down by company. [Official Report, 9 July 2008, Vol. 478, c. 9MC.] [200017]


2 Jun 2008 : Column 539W

Hazel Blears: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban) on 29 November 2007, Official Report, column 681W.

Between then and the end of the financial year, the Department has undertaken the following work from polling companies.

Andrew Irving Associates Ltd.

COI

Cragg Ross Dawson Ltd.

Dorset County Council

GFK NOP Ltd.

TH Seagrove

IPSOS Mori

Stewart Hosie: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what consultants
2 Jun 2008 : Column 540W
have been contracted by her Department to conduct public participation activities in the last three years; and how much expenditure her Department has incurred on each such contract to date. [206213]

Mr. Dhanda: This information is not held centrally and could be supplied only at disproportionate cost.

Disabled Facilities Grants

Mr. Oaten: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) how much she has allocated to disability facility grants for each of the (a) last and (b) next five years; what estimate she has made of the average local authority contribution to such grants over the same periods; and what estimate she has made of the overall cost to the public purse of disability facility grants over the same periods; [207459]

(2) what assessment she has made of the likely effect of the removal of the obligation on local authorities to contribute 40 per cent. of disability facility grant awards on the (a) level and (b) effectiveness of such awards; and if she will make a statement. [207460]

Mr. Dhanda: The Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) is a mandatory grant used to provide adaptations to the homes of disabled people. Local authorities in England report to the Department their annual DFG expenditure through the Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix. The 2006-07 Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix report is the latest available data and is available at:

Communities and Local Government do not hold information on how much local authorities plan to spend on DFG in the next five years.

The following table details funding for the past five years and Communities and Local Government funding for the current Comprehensive Spending Review period.

£
DFG 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Government contribution

99,000

99,572

111,294

120,723

138,250

146,081

156,000

166,000

Total including LA contribution

194,890

210,922

221,289

232,828

259,389

274,356

n/a

n/a

Note: 2007-08 and 2008-09 are estimated returns provided by the 2006-07 Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix.

Prior to 2008-09 Communities and Local Government contributed 60 per cent. of the value of the DFG to local authorities up to an agreed allocation with the local authority funding the remaining 40 per cent. Many local authorities have been spending considerably more than the 40 per cent. match funding element of the DFG on providing adaptations. The mandatory nature of the DFG remains in place with the legal responsibility for delivering the scheme resting with local authorities. It is therefore expected that the removal of the 60:40 split will have no impact on the level of local authority investment.

Relaxing the ring fence will enable local authorities to bring together different funding streams, allowing greater flexibility and freedom in administering the programme. It will also empower local authorities to design services which fit with local delivery arrangements and the needs of individuals. Local authorities will, for example, be able to use DFG funding to cover the costs of moving home, where this is a more appropriate solution to adaptation.

Faith Communities Capacity Building Fund

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will make it her policy to review the granting of funds under the Faith Communities Capacity Building Fund to the New Kadampa Tradition; and if she will make a statement. [207497]


2 Jun 2008 : Column 541W

Mr. Dhanda: The Faith Communities Capacity Building Fund covered the period August 2006 to March 2008. The fund has now finished and all monies have been distributed. The Government will not be reviewing the allocation of funding.

Fire Services

Robert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) on what date the new networked fire control rooms provided by EADS will be in operational use; [207524]

(2) what liability fire and rescue authorities will have for the costs of each regional control centre (RCC) company (a) before and (b) after each RCC becomes operational; [207528]

(3) if she will publish the FiReControl project timetable for each (a) Government Office region and (b) fire authority; and on what anticipated dates fire and rescue authorities will become responsible for the operating costs of each regional control centre. [207529]

Mr. Dhanda: A Regional Control Centre (RCC) becomes operational when the first Fire and Rescue Authority (FRA) transfer calls to that RCC. Within a region, FRAs will then cut-over sequentially. The programme is detailed in the following table. All FRAs should have transferred its calls to the RCC network by September 2011.

Prior to cut-over, CLG will meet the running costs. As each FRA cuts over it will meet its share of the costs of running the RCC. How costs are apportioned between FRAs within a region is a matter for each region to decide.


2 Jun 2008 : Column 542W
Fire and Rescue Authority Control room functions cut-over

East Midlands

Derbyshire

October 2009

Leicestershire

January 2010

Nottinghamshire

March 2010

Lincolnshire

May 2010

Northamptonshire

July 2010

North East

Durham and Darlington

January 2010

Tyne and Wear

October 2009

Cleveland

March 2010

Northumberland

March 2010

South West

Somerset

October 2009

Devon

January 2010

Dorset

March 2010

Avon

May 2010

Cornwall

July 2010

Wiltshire

September 2010

Gloucestershire

January 2011

West Midlands

Staffordshire

January 2010

West Midlands

March 2010

Shropshire

May 2010

Hereford and Worcester

September 2010

Warwickshire

July 2010

South East

Hampshire

May 2010

Royal Berkshire

September 2010

Oxfordshire

January 2011

Kent

March 2011

East Sussex

May 2011

Buckinghamshire

Jul 2011

Isle of Wight

September 2011

Surrey

September 2011

West Sussex

July 2010

North West

Cumbria

March 2011

Cheshire

March 2011

Lancashire

March 2011

Greater Manchester

September 2010

Merseyside

January 2011

Yorkshire and Humberside

West Yorkshire

January 2011

South Yorkshire

March 2011

Humberside

May 2011

North Yorkshire

May 2011

East of England

Essex

July 2011

Norfolk

September 2011

Cambridge and Peterborough

May 2011

Hertfordshire

September 2011

Bedfordshire and Luton

July 2011

Suffolk

July 2011

London

London

November 2010


Next Section Index Home Page