Mr. Letwin: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will place in the Library a copy of his Departments (a) chart of accounts and (b) resource account codes and usage descriptions for the 2008-09 financial year. 
David Cairns: The chart of accounts for 2008-09 reflects the structure of the Scotland Office and Office of the Advocate-General for the year and will not necessarily reflect the 2007-08 structure or that for future years. The chart shows the relationship between parent codes (used for preparing resource accounts) and children codes (used for more detailed management purposes). Each code has a brief description that describes its use. A copy of the chart has been placed in the House Library.
Mrs. May: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland pursuant to the answer of 9 June 2008, Official Report, columns 13-14W, on official hospitality, how many individuals and organisations attended each event listed. 
David Mundell: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many times he has met (a) the First Minister of Scotland, (b) the Secretary of State for Wales, (c) the Secretary of State for Justice and (d) the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland to discuss the operation of the Joint Ministerial Committee since 16 May 2007. 
David Cairns: The Secretary of State regularly meets with other ministerial colleagues and discusses a range of issues, he has also met with the First Minister. Last month, I attended a preliminary meeting with the Secretary of State for Wales and the First Minister in advance of the forthcoming Joint Ministerial plenary meeting.
Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many (a) Ministers and (b) officials from his Department plan to attend the Beijing Olympic Games; to what purpose in each case; and what estimate he has made of the cost. 
Harry Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what the total cost to the public purse was of the construction and operation of the millennium dome; what assessment he has made of the value for money provided by that expenditure; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Sutcliffe: The cost to the public purse of the construction and operation of the millennium dome was nil. The construction and operation of the dome was funded from national lottery grant from the Millennium Commission and income from ticket sales and sponsorship, not from Exchequer funding.
It is a matter of public record that the dome was completed on time, that the final cost was just 4 per cent. over budget, that it was by far the most visited paying attraction in the UK in the year 2000 and that it helped regenerate a wide area.
I am advised that English Partnerships spent £33 million of Exchequer funding on decommissioning and maintenance of the millennium dome structure between 1999 and June 2007, with the expectation that these costs will be recovered from sale proceeds from the contract for the future use of the dome and redevelopment of associated land over the life of the project.
Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will place in the Library a list of meetings he attended with hon. and right hon. Members from the (a) Democratic Unionist Party and (b) Ulster Unionist Party, including those meetings at which no civil servants were present, between 31 March 2008 and 11 June 2008; and if he will make a statement. 
Simon Hughes: To ask the Prime Minister if he will place in the Library a list of meetings he attended with hon. and right hon. Members from the (a) Democratic Unionist Party and (b) Ulster Unionist Party, including those meetings at which no civil servants were present, between 31 March 2008 and 11 June 2008; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Maude: To ask the Prime Minister how many individual domestic air flights were undertaken within mainland Britain by representatives of Downing street in the most recent year for which figures are available; and at what cost. 
The Prime Minister: The information is not available in the format requested and could be obtained only at disproportionate costs. All travel is undertaken in accordance with the Civil Service Management Code and the Ministerial Code.
Mr. Maude: To ask the Prime Minister how many films have been produced in (a) video, (b) DVD and (c) other digital formats by Downing street in the last 24 months; and what the title was of each film. 
Mr. Hoban: To ask the Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 1 May 2008, Official Report, column 624W, on departmental manpower, (1) if he will break down by pay grade members of staff listed; 
The Prime Minister: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Lewes (Norman Baker) and the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) on 17 October 2007, Official Report, column 1135W.
Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Prime Minister (1) how many officials from No. 10 Downing street plan to attend the Beijing Olympic Games; to what purpose in each case; and what estimate he has made of the cost; 
Since 1999, the Government have published an annual list of all visits overseas undertaken by Cabinet Ministers costing £500 or more during each financial year. Copies of these lists are available in the Library of the House. Information on the number of officials accompanying Ministers on overseas visits is included in the list. All Ministers travel arrangements are in accordance with the arrangements for official travel set out in chapter 10 of the Ministerial Code, and the accompanying guidance document, Travel by Ministers. Information for 2008-09 will be published in the normal way.
Mr. Evans: To ask the Prime Minister (1) what discussions he has had with his Irish counterpart following the result of the referendum in the Republic of Ireland on the Lisbon treaty; and if he will make a statement; 
(3) what discussions he has had with (a) the President of the European Commission and (b) other members of the European Commission following the result of the referendum in the Republic of Ireland on the Lisbon treaty; and if he will make a statement. 
The Prime Minister: I refer the hon. Member to the statement made by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (David Miliband) on 16 June 2008, Official Report, column 704, and my answers at Prime Ministers questions today.
Stephen Hesford: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what information he holds on the number of executions which took place internationally in 2007, broken down by (a) country and (b) sex; and if he will make a statement. 
Meg Munn: The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) does not hold figures on executions that have taken place around the world. Amnesty International publishes information on the minimum number of executions by country. These are available online at:
The UK opposes the death penalty in all circumstances. We have demonstrated our opposition to capital punishment by raising the issue of the death penalty with third countries and playing a key role in the successful adoption of a resolution calling for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty at the UN General Assembly in 2007.
Mr. Francois: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with (a) EU partners and (b) the European Commission on the CAP common agricultural policy reform health check announced on 20 May 2008. 
Mr. Jim Murphy [holding answer 5 June 2008]: My right hon. Friends the Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary and the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and I, as well as officials at the UK Representation in Brussels and across our European network, are in regular contact with EU partners and the European Commission on a full range of issues.
The Government's position on the common agricultural policy (CAP) health check is well established. We welcomed the publication of the health check proposals as a further step in the process of reforming the CAP. We are seeking an ambitious outcome that further cuts the trade distorting nature of the CAP, which has contributed to high food prices. We want reduced regulatory burdens to give farmers greater control over their business decisions and redirect more CAP spending away from direct farm payments towards delivery of targeted public benefits.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|