|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
As some of these estimates are for a subset of the population in small geographical areas, they are based on small sample sizes, and are therefore subject to large margins of uncertainty.
|Number of people, aged 16 and over, in full and part-time( 1) employment, resident in Chorley parliamentary constituency( 2) , Lancashire( 3) and the north-west( 4) ,1998-2007|
|Chorley( 2)||Lancashire( 3)||North West( 4)|
|12 months ending||Full-time||Part-time||Total||Full-time||Part-time||Total||Full-time||Part-time||Total|
|(1) Includes those full-time and part-time on New Deal. (2) 1995 parliamentary constituency boundary to February 2004, 2005 parliamentary constituency boundary revision thereafter. (3) Local authority district. (4) Government office region. (5) Based on annual Labour Force Survey (LFS). (6) Based on Annual Population Survey (APS). Notes: 1. As these estimates are for a subset of the population in a small geographical area, they are based on small sample sizes, and are therefore subject to large margins of uncertainty. 2. Due to rounding the totals may not sum. Source: Annual Population Survey and annual Labour Force Survey.|
Mr. Hoban: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster whether the contract for the provision of the facilities for the Heads of Government Summit held on 5 April was put out to competitive tender. 
The Progressive Governance summit on 5 April was an inter-governmental summit, responsibility for which fell to the Government who were liable for the costs.
The FCO made a contribution to the costs which included the hire of the hotel and for the provision of media facilities.
Mr. Hoban: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what the total cost of the Heads of Government Summit held on 5 April was; and how much was spent on (a) accommodation, (b) transport, (c) conference room hire, (d) food, (e) alcoholic drinks, (f) soft drinks and (g) other. 
Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many conceptions there were in girls of (a) 18, (b) 17, (c) 16, (d) 15 and (e) 14 years or under in Peterborough city council area in each year since 1997. 
As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent question asking how many conceptions there were to girls of (a) 18, (b) 17, (c) 16, (d) 15 and (e) 14 years or under in Peterborough City Council area in each year since 1997. (214573)
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) does not publish figures by single year of age below the age of 16 by either local or health authority because of the risk of disclosing individuals information. Figures for girls aged 16, 17 and 18 are not readily
available. ONS, however, routinely publishes conception figures for girls aged under 16 and under 18 by local authorities. Therefore, number of conceptions for girls in these age groups in Peterborough UA for the years 1997-2006 (the most recent year for which figures are available), are shown in the table below. Figures for 2006 are provisional.
Conceptions are estimated using the number of conceptions that resulted in a live birth, stillbirth or legal termination.
|Number of conceptions to girls aged under 16 and under 18, Peterborough UA 1997-2006|
|Under 18||Under 16|
|(1) Conceptions for 2006 are provisional.|
As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question on how many workless households there were in Peterborough constituency in each month since January 2001. 
Data has already been provided on Workless Households in the Peterborough Constituency for the three months ending in June of 1999 and 2001-2007, Official Report 28 January 2008, columns 68W-69W. Workless household data are not available on a more frequent basis.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|