Previous Section Index Home Page

22 July 2008 : Column 1178W—continued


Special bonus—the special bonus scheme enables line managers to award a one-off bonus to recognise and reward exceptional personal or team achievement. Detailed criteria are determined by local managers. Awards may be cash or vouchers but the amounts that can be awarded are modest because the total expenditure over the year is limited to 0.25 per cent. of the manager’s staffing budget. As there is no maximum amount set, these have not been included in the aforementioned table.

2. SCS

Performance year Percentage receiving maximum bonus Percentage not receiving maximum bonus

2005-06

8.45

91.55

2006-07

1.78

98.22


All bonuses are non-consolidated and so they are not added into salary and are not-pensionable.

Departmental Pilot Schemes

Hywel Williams: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what criteria are used to decide which region is selected for a pilot scheme by his Department; [216918]


22 July 2008 : Column 1179W

(2) what his Department's total budget was for running pilot schemes in each of the last five years; and how much was spent (a) in Wales and (b) on testing service provision through the medium of Welsh; [216919]

(3) how many pilot schemes were run by his Department in each of the last five years, broken down by region. [216920]

Mr. Timms [holding answer 7 July 2008]: The Department runs pilots to test the effectiveness of different approaches to service provision in achieving results and in improving the customer experience. The decision on where these pilots are operated is based on a number of different criteria. These can include the type and location of the service being tested, the customer group involved, and the location of other pilots already under way. The decision on the location of a pilot also takes account of the need to ensure the customer base is sufficiently large to make the results of the pilot meaningful. Any pilot testing a service in Wales includes testing service provision in the Welsh language. Pilots that have been run in Wales include Pathways to Work in Bridgend, Rhondda, Cynon and Taff; Swansea Bay, West Wales; and Eastern Valleys; and new deal plus for lone parents in Cardiff.

Data over the last five years on the number of pilot schemes, the regions involved, and costs could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Disabled: Respite Care

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how the funding for the provision of short break services announced in the Aiming High for Disabled Children document, will be spent in each year over the Comprehensive Spending Review period. [220210]

Kevin Brennan: I have been asked to reply.

In line with the commitments in Aiming High for Disabled Children, the Government intend to issue local authorities with revenue funding of £15.6 million in 2008-09, £75.8 million in 2009-10, and £177.6 million in 2010-11 for the transformation of short break provision. £11 million will be spent over the CSR period on programme support and evaluation.

In addition to this funding, the Government will also provide local authorities with short break capital funding of £4.5 million in 2008-09, £33 million in 2009-10 and £52.5 million in 2010-11. This additional £90 million was announced in the Children’s Plan in December 2007,

Funding allocations to local authorities can be viewed at:

Employment

Mr. Clappison: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many (a) UK nationals, ( b) non-UK EU nationals and (c) non-EU nationals were in (i) full-time employment and (ii) part-time employment in the UK in each year since 1995; and
22 July 2008 : Column 1180W
what the percentage rate of change was for UK nationals in each type of employment as a proportion of the UK working age population in each of those years. [169293]

Mr. Timms: I apologise for the delay in replying to the hon. Member which was as a result of an administrative error in relation to the transfer of his question to another Department. The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. The National Statistician will write to the hon. Member and a copy of the response will be placed in the Library of the House.

Mr. Clappison: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 12 May 2008, Official Report, columns 1299-1301W, on employment, if he will break down the figures in Table D, foreign nationals, into (a) EU and (b) non EU citizens. [206255]

Mr. Timms: The information requested is given in the following tables.

The figures for foreign nationals provided in the answer given to the hon. Member on 12 May 2008, Official Report, columns 1299-1301W, were, as stated in the response, based on 2003 population estimates which were the latest estimates available at the time. On 14 May, ONS released re-weighted data based on 2007 population estimates. The foreign nationals table provided has therefore been revised to reflect the latest population estimates available and to include data on additional quarters now available, namely Q2 1998, Q2 2000 and Q1 2008. The tables for EU and non-EU nationals also use the 2007 population estimates.

Table (D) foreign nationals

(i) Employment rate (percentage) (ii) WA employment (iii) 16+ employment

Q2 1997

60.3

940,000

970,000

Q2 1998

60.3

1,040,000

1,060,000

Q2 1999

60.0

990,000

1,020,000

Q2 2000

60.4

1,110,000

1,140,000

Q2 2001

61.6

1,180,000

1,210,000

Q2 2002

62.2

1,260,000

1,300,000

Q2 2003

62.7

1,360,000

1,390,000

Q2 2004

64.8

1,470,000

1,500,000

Q2 2005

63.9

1,570,000

1,600,000

Q1 2006

67.0

1,760,000

1,800,000

Q2 2006

68.0

1,840,000

1,880,000

Q3 2006

69.2

1,910,000

1,960,000

Q4 2006

68.7

1,960,000

2,010,000

Q1 2007

66.9

1,980,000

2,020,000

Q2 2007

67.9

2,100,000

2,140,000

Q3 2007

68.6

2,110,000

2,150,000

Q4 2007

68.3

2,170,000

2,210,000

Q1 2008

69.2

2,250,000

2,290,000



22 July 2008 : Column 1181W
Table (D) (a) EU nationals

(i) Employment rate (percentage) (ii) WA employment (iii) 16+ employment

Q2 1997

66.7

400,000

420,000

Q2 1998

68.5

450,000

470,000

Q2 1999

69.0

430,000

450,000

Q2 2000

69.0

440,000

460,000

Q2 2001

72.6

470,000

490,000

Q2 2002

72.4

460,000

480,000

Q2 2003

72.4

490,000

520,000

Q2 2004

71.9

560,000

580,000

Q2 2005

73.2

620,000

640,000

Q1 2006

75.2

720,000

740,000

Q2 2006

75.8

710,000

730,000

Q3 2006

77.3

750,000

780,000

Q4 2006

77.2

830,000

860,000

Q1 2007

77.4

900,000

920,000

Q2 2007

77.1

970,000

990,000

Q3 2007

78.4

970,000

990,000

Q4 2007

79.0

1,010,000

1,030,000

Q1 2008

78.9

1,070,000

1,090,000


Table (D) (b) non-EU nationals

(i) Employment r ate (percentage) (ii) WA employment (iii) 16+ e mployment

Q2 1997

56.2

540,000

550,000

Q2 1998

55.3

590,000

300,000

Q2 1999

54.6

560,000

570,000

Q2 2000

55.9

670,000

580,000

Q2 2001

56.0

710,000

^30,000

Q2 2002

57.5

800,000

520,000

Q2 2003

58.2

860,000

370,000

Q2 2004

61.1

910,000

J20.000

Q2 2005

59.0

950,000

J60.000

Q1 2006

62.3

1,040,000

060,000

Q2 2006

63.8

1,120,000

140,000

Q3 2006

64.8

1,160,000

180,000

Q4 2006

63.6

1,130,000

150,000

Q1 2007

60.1

1,080,000

100,000

Q2 2007

61.7

1,130,000

150,000

Q3 2007

62.1

1,140,000

160,000

Q4 2007

61.1

1,160,000

180,000

Q1 2008

62.3

1,190,000

200,000

Notes:
1. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10,000.
2. The figures provided in the tables are not seasonally adjusted. This means direct comparisons between different quarters are not possible.
3. In order to provide the more detailed breakdown that is required to answer the question, a country is defined as being in the EU only from the date at which it became a member state. This means that workers from some countries (e.g. Estonia) will be counted as non-EU nationals for some years (in the case of Estonia prior to 2004) and EU nationals for other years.
4. The totals for foreign nationals in Table (D) may not be equal to the sum of the corresponding numbers shown for EU and non-EU nationals—Tables (D) (a) and (D) (b) respectively—due to rounding.
5. As these figures are based on a sample survey they are also subject to sampling variability.
6. It should be noted that the nationality question in the LFS is an undercount because:
it excludes those who have not been resident in the UK for six months;
it excludes students in halls who do not have a UK resident parent;
it excludes people in most other types of communal establishments (e.g. hotels, boarding houses, hostels, mobile home sites, etc);
it is grossed to population estimates that only include migrants staying for 12 months or more.
Source:
Labour Force Survey (LFS)

Next Section Index Home Page