Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Denis MacShane (Rotherham) (Lab): I congratulate the hon. Member for Forest of Dean (Mr. Harper) on making a very moderate speech. I am grateful to him for remembering the modest contribution that I once made many years ago in serving Her Majesty on matters European. However, as so often with the Better Off Out group of the Conservative party, his speech and his Bill hide behind them concepts and problems that need to be unpicked.
I would have no objection if on the front of every Bill that came before this House there were some symbol or statement of its origin. The vast majority of legislation that has emanated from the EU has done so since the Single European Act was passed in 1986. That has had a huge impact on the legislation of 26 other countries. A great number of different groups in those countries think that the Single European Act, with its rather steam-rollering approach to enforcing free trade, is the child of the noble Baroness Thatcher, so perhaps on the front of every Bill across Europe that is connected with that Act we should have a nice picture of Margaret Thatcher to remind Europeans of where some of the best European legislation comes from.
The hon. Gentleman made heavy weather of trying to establish what percentage of our laws come from the European Union. If we think honestly about what takes up our time in the House, what worries our constituents and what fills the front pages of our newspapers, we find that very little is connected with the EU. Having already voted to outlaw wife-beating, I hope that later today we will outlaw child-beating. I do not know whether those on the Treasury Bench are of that mind.
Other issues ahead of us in the next few weeks include stem cell research, time limits on abortion, who might decide on the next police chief of London, identity cards, the length of detention for those suspected of serious terrorist crimes, university admissions and fees, our taxation policy, and what we heard about a moment ago from my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, with the Bill that will follow. Those are all made-in-Britain laws. That is true in France, Germany, Poland, Sweden, Ireland, Finland and all members of the European Union. Of course, that which is connected to the Single European Act has to do with Europe.
In a debate earlier this year, I said that according to the Libraryif I have time, I will read out some of its detailed statisticsonly 10 per cent. of the laws that impact on us in the United Kingdom, adopted by this House principally through statutory instruments, emanate from the European Union. Then, to my horror, the right hon. Member for Richmond, Yorks (Mr. Hague), the shadow Foreign Secretary, leapt to his feet and quoted another right hon. Gentleman who had said that 50 per cent. or more of regulations came from the European Union. That right hon. Gentleman was the Prime Minister. Naturally, as a devoted admirer and fan of my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister over decades, I was very concerned thus to be put in my place. I wrote to the Prime Minister to see whether the right hon. Member for Richmond, Yorks had accurately quoted him. I have a letter here, very kindly addressed, Dear Denis, and dated 30 April this year, in which he says
thaton averagearound 9 per cent. of all statutory instruments transpose EC legislation...I believe this is the correct figure.
In a debate in this House on 3 June, the right hon. Member for Hitchin and Harpenden (Mr. Lilley) said that about 80 per cent. of all legislation emanated from the European Union, quoting a German Government source. The BBC and others have been trying to find this German Government sourceis it Goethe, Schiller, or Mrs. Merkel?and find that they cannot. It really is not good enough to come to the House and quote anonymous Germans, whoever they may be, in defence of the preposterous position that 80 per cent. of all our laws come from the European Union.
Nevertheless, the right hon. Gentleman was in very good company. Only two weeks ago, I had the pleasure of switching on the Today programme before 7 oclock to find Mr. John Humphrys interviewing my favourite Euro-comic turn, Mr. Nigel Farage of the UK Independence party. NigelI hope that he does not mind my being familiar, but we get on quite wellsaid that 75 per cent. of all laws in the UK were now decided by the European Union: 5 per cent. less than the right hon. Gentlemans figure. I do not know what had happened in the intervening two or three months. As Mr. Humphrys is usually so swift and vigorous in picking up anything that is a palpable untruth, I wrote to the BBC to ask whether that figure was going to be corrected or whether Mr. Humphrys could be politely asked, next time he hears this nonsense, from whatever source, to slap it down.
Before the European Parliament elections it is important that we establish certain accepted truths about the European Union. It is time to nail here in this House, and publicly, the lie that the EU is responsible for 80 per cent. of our laws, according to the right hon. Member for Hitchin and Harpenden, or for 75 per cent., according to Mr. Nigel Farage. I have here a letter from Mr. Malcolm Balen, a senior editorial adviser at BBC News. It is very friendly, but whenever someone from the BBC writes to one of us on these issues they go into a special room, cover themselves in grease, and then go for a swim in oil, so what he says is, to put it mildly, quite hard to
grasp. He turns to Mr. Mark Mardell, the BBCs excellent Europe editor, saying that Mr. Mardell
has previously researched Mr Farages claim, made on Today, that this figure is 75 per cent., and found that it is supposedly based on a German government statement, although no-one has actually discovered it.
Mark points out, however, that this whole area is a contentious one and that the last time he tried to establish an accurate figure he found the subject, in his words, too jelly-like to nail down.
We are not dealing with jelly, but with laws made in this country that affect all our citizens. On that point, I completely agree with the hon. Member for Forest of Dean, but we have to avoid a circular argument. That Conservative party front organisation against Europe, Open Europe, issued a document recently stating that the smoking ban and the provisions we have for cigarette packs originated in Europe. In fact, Britain was one of the earliest countriesgoing back to when there was a Conservative Governmentto bring in the smoking damages your health warnings. They made the case for it in Europe, Europe made it a European-wide law, which I support, and it then came back into our law. We are seeing law made in Britain transposed through Europe back into our own legislation. We end up in a Kafkaesque world, where ideas start in Britain, and during a period of many years they go to Europe and are agreed there. They then come back into our law and are blamed on the European Union.
This Bill does not contribute one whit to reform or educating the public. It is part of the continuing drive by the Conservative party, as we saw expressed at its conference last week, to cut all links with the ruling centre-right parties in Europe, andif we were to experience the misfortune of their forming a Governmentto take us steadily to the exit door of the European Union. I oppose this Bill.
Question put, pursuant to Standing Order No. 23 (Motions for leave to bring in b ills and nomination of s elect c ommittees at commencement of public business):
The House proceeded to a Division.
Mr. Deputy Speaker (Sir Alan Haselhurst): I ask the Serjeant at Arms to investigate the delay in the No Lobby.
[Relevant documents: T he Fifteenth Report from the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Legislative Scrutiny, HC 440, and the Twenty-third Report from the Committee, Legislative Scrutiny: Government Replies, HC 755.]
As amended in the Public Bill Committee, considered.
After paragraph 8 of Schedule 2 to the 1989 Act insert
Provision for accommodated children
8A (1) Every local authority shall make provision for such services as they consider appropriate to be available with respect to accommodated children.
(2) Accommodated children are those children in respect of whose accommodation the local authority have been notified under section 85 or 86.
(3) The services shall be provided with a view to promoting contact between each accommodated child and that childs family.
(4) The services may, in particular, include
(a) advice, guidance and counselling;
(b) services necessary to enable the child to visit, or to be visited by, members of the family;
(c) assistance to enable the child and members of the family to have a holiday together.
(5) Nothing in this paragraph affects the duty imposed by paragraph 10.. [Sarah McCarthy-Fry.]
Brought up, and read the First time.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (Sarah McCarthy-Fry): I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
Mr. Deputy Speaker (Sir Alan Haselhurst): With this it will be convenient to discuss the following: New clause 6 Looked after status
(1) The 1989 Act is amended as follows.
(2) In section 85(4)(duty of local authority when notified of child accommodated by health authority or local education authority) at end insert ; and
(c) consider whether, in the exercise of their functions under paragraph (b), the childs welfare is best safeguarded and promoted by being a looked after child..
New clause 24 Responsibility for children in care who enter custody
In section 20 of the 1989 Act after subsection (11), insert
(12) Where a child was accommodated by the local authority under this section immediately before being detained, the child shall continue to be deemed a looked after child for the purposes of section 23(1)(b) and section 24 of this Act save for the provision of accommodation.
(13) In this section detained means detained in a remand centre, a young offenders institution or a secure training centre, or any other institution pursuant to an order of a court.
In section 22 of the 1989 Act after subsection (1)(b), insert
(c) deemed to be looked after in accordance with section 20(12)..
New clause 26 Support for family and friends carers
After section 17B of the 1989 Act insert
17C Support for family and friends carers
(1) This section applies to a person (P) who provides full-time care and accommodation for a child (C) for more than 56 days but who is not
(b) a local authority foster parent.
(2) A local authority shall assess Ps need for financial and other support under Part III of this Act to care for C in any of the following circumstances
(a) where the child comes to live with P as a result of a plan made following an enquiry under section 47 (local authoritys duty to investigate) or a Family Group Conference;
(b) where the child comes to live with P following an investigation under section 37 (powers of court in certain family proceedings);
(c) where P has secured a residence order or special guardianship order in order to avoid the child being looked after, and there is professional evidence of impairment of the parents ability to care for the child;
(d) where P has obtained a residence order or special guardianship order arising out of care proceedings;
(e) where P is providing accommodation for the child and then secures a residence order or special guardianship order.
(3) The local authority shall provide such support as is required to meet the needs identified by the assessment referred to in this section..
New clause 28 Collection of statistics
(1) The Secretary of State shall collect and publish annually statistics on the accommodation arrangements for young people who were in the care of a local authority on 1st January of the year three years earlier than the year in which the statistics are published and were over 16 years old.
(2) The statistics published under subsection (1) shall indicate in respect of the young persons the number who were with foster carers at the age of
Government amendments Nos. 8 and 9.
Amendment No. 13, in clause 9, page 7, line 41, at end insert
(e) C does not have more than three placements within a 12 month period or more than two placements within the last year of compulsory schooling.
(8A) If the requirement in subsection (8)(e) is not complied with, the local authority must provide C with a written explanation..
Amendment No. 14, in clause 10, page 9, line 14, at end insert
(c) a strategy with their Housing and Planning department for maximising the availability of foster care placements..
Amendment No. 18, in clause 11, page 9, line 28, at end insert
(2A) A local authority must offer the services of an independent reviewing officer to any relevant child for whom it is the responsible local authority..
Next Section | Index | Home Page |