Previous Section Index Home Page

20 Oct 2008 : Column 126W—continued


Armed Forces: Recruitment

Mr. Ancram: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many servicemen and women were recruited to (a) the Army, (b) the Royal Navy and (c) the Royal Air Force in 2007-08; and how many left each service in the same period. [227975]

Mr. Bob Ainsworth: The number of UK regular forces servicemen and women recruited to and leaving (a) the Army, (b) the Royal Navy and (c) the Royal Air Force in 2007-08 can be found in tables 3 and 4 of Tri-Service Publication (TSP) 1—UK Regular Forces Strengths and Changes. TSP 1 is published monthly and the most recent publication shows figures for the 12 months to 1 September 2008 and financial year 2007-08 figures. September 2008 TSP 1 can be found at:

Copies of TSP 1 are also available in the Library of the House.

Armed Forces: Schools

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the co-operation between schools and armed forces recruitment centres; and if he will make a statement. [219914]

Mr. Bob Ainsworth: Co-operation between armed forces recruitment staffs and local schools remains at a high level. Armed forces presentation teams and careers advisers visit about 1,000 state and public schools across the UK each year, but only at the specific invitation of the schools/colleges themselves. Their aims are to raise the students’ awareness of the armed forces in a democratic society, support schools’ careers programmes, facilitate participative learning exercises with students, and offer advice on service careers. The teams do not go into schools to recruit.

We are proud of the work the single-service presentation teams do with schools and colleges to inform young people about the tremendous work undertaken and careers on offer in the armed forces and which can provide fantastic opportunities to a wide range of people from all sectors of society. Young people should be shown all available career options; the more information they receive about life in the Armed Forces, covering all points good and bad, the better informed they will be.

Armed Forces: Training

Andrew Mackinlay: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what account his Department has taken in its formulation of policy on training of the summing-up remarks of Mr. Justice Royce of Winchester Crown Court before the acquittal of Provost Sergeant Russell Price, Sergeant Paul Blake and Corporal John Edwards on 31 July 2008. [227404]

Mr. Bob Ainsworth: Immediately following Mr. Justice Royce's summing-up remarks, amendments were made to the Adjutant General's Administrative Instructions 67 (AGAI 67) Part Two (Minor Action) and this amendment has also been incorporated into Joint Service Publication 833 (Minor Administrative Action). The amendments relate to the award of a minor sanction. Any person awarding a minor sanction must now give the individual supervising the sanction written details of the sanction.

Other aspects of the summing-up remarks will be investigated as part of either the ongoing investigation currently being conducted by the royal military police or by the subsequent Army Board of Inquiry. It would therefore not be appropriate to comment further at this time.

Armed Forces: Weapons

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of (a) AS90s and (b) L118s are (i) in service, (ii) fit for purpose and (iii) out of service. [226834]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The figures requested are as follows.


20 Oct 2008 : Column 127W

Percentage of total holdings in service Percentage of in service holding fit for purpose Percentage of total holdings out of service

AS90

100

97

0

L118

100

100

0


There are 20 L118 (light gun) guns in service that are used for saluting and ceremonial roles. These are not capable of firing live rounds but for the purposes of answering this question they are counted as fit for purpose.

In answering this question the following definitions have been used:

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of (a) light machine guns, (b) general purpose machine guns and (c) heavy machine guns are (i) in service, (ii) fit for purpose and (iii) out of service. [226835]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The figures requested are as follows.

Percentage of total holdings in service Percentage of in service holdings fit for purpose Percentage of total holdings out of service

Light machine gun

100

96

0

General purpose machine gun

100

85

0

Heavy machine gun

100

94

0


In answering the question the following definitions have been used.

Armoured Fighting Vehicles

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of (a) Scimitar and (b) Spartans are (i) in service, (ii) fit for purpose and (iii) out of service. [226989]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The figures requested are shown in the following table:

Percentage
Vehicle Total fleet in-service In-service fleet fit for purpose Total fleet out-of-service

Scimitar

100

89

0

Spartan

100

90

0


20 Oct 2008 : Column 128W

In answering this question the following definitions have been used:

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the current (a) in-service date and (b) cost of the Future Rapid Effects System is. [227869]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The Future Rapid Effect System programme is currently in its assessment phase. The in-service date and the cost of the programme will not be fixed until the main investment decision has been taken.

Army: Manpower

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the (a) required, (b) actual and (c) fit for task strength of each battalion of the infantry is. [226906]

Mr. Bob Ainsworth: The figures requested are shown in the following tables.

The figures in both tables include personnel filling all roles within each battalion, not just infantrymen. Fit for task has been defined as fully deployable, and thus excludes those who may be fit to perform rear party duty.

This answer differs to the one I gave to the hon. Member on 19 June 2008, Official Report, column 1091W, primarily because the figures also take account of personnel listed as being of limited deployability or non-deployable for non-medical reasons.


20 Oct 2008 : Column 129W
Div Unit Required strength Actual strength Fit for task strength

Guards

1 Grenadier Guards

580

491

410

1 Coldstream Gds

627

563

491

1 Scots Guards

760

595

485

1 Irish Guards

636

570

419

1 Welsh Guards

631

588

515

Scots

1 Scots

633

628

507

2 Scots

566

449

405

3 Scots

535

470

348

4 Scots

760

642

448

5 Scots

654

560

448

Queens

1 Princess of Wales Royal Regiment

760

658

549

2 Princess of Wales Royal Regiment

625

538

478

1 Royal Regt Fusiliers

753

649

580

2 Royal Regt Fusiliers

623

530

457

1 Royal Anglian

670

691

518

2 Royal Anglian

627

629

511

Kings

1 Lancs

741

666

566

2 Lancs

664

737

669

1 Yorks

633

541

505

2 Yorks

627

501

423

3 Yorks

684

547

421

PoW

1 Mercian

627

513

417

2 Mercian

620

555

477

3 Mercian

690

564

402

1 Royal Welsh

625

545

453

2 Royal Welsh

756

647

475

Rifles

2 Rifles

615

584

484

3 Rifles

625

602

556

4 Rifles

702

684

528

5 Rifles

760

700

553

RI

1 Royal Irish

654

516

414

Para

2 Para

654

646

585

3 Para

654

607

566

RGR

1 Royal Gurkha Rifles

643

759

586

2 Royal Gurkha Rifles

822

913

831


Next Section Index Home Page