|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Mr. Winnick: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if she will ask the Chief Constable of Staffordshire Police to provide a substantive reply to the hon. Member for Walsall, North to his letter of 4 September concerning a constituent (reference: NH/JF); and if she will inquire into the reasons for the time taken to reply. 
Mr. Coaker: Neither the Home Office nor its Ministers are able to comment on or intervene in individual matters. The Chief Officer is responsible for the day-to-day operational management of the force, not the Home Secretary. Matters relating to the investigation of a crime and the deployment of resources are the responsibility of the local Chief Officer. It is however understood that the hon. Member received a reply from the Chief Constable of Staffordshire Police on 20 October.
Mr. Hands: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what arrangements her Department has in place to assist officials to overcome the effects of stress experienced in the workplace. 
Mr. Woolas: The Home Office is committed is committed to the well-being of its employees. It has a number of procedures in place to reduce stress at work. This provision includes an industry-standard Employee Assistance Programme which gives staff access to a professional advice and counselling service on any work-related or personal issues. We provide, on demand, critical incident de-briefing interventions for operational staff who have been involved in difficult or dangerous operational situations which may have caused either physical or emotional distress.
Mr. Prisk: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much was claimed in expenses for taxi travel by officials from (a) her Department and (b) its executive agencies in (i) 2006-07, (ii) 2005-06, (iii) 2004-05, (iv) 2003-04 and (v) 2002-03; and if she will make a statement. 
Mr. Woolas: The Home Office spend on taxis for financial years 2002-03 to 2006-07 is set out in the following table. All travel is undertaken in accordance with the Civil Service Management and Ministerial Codes.
These figures include expenditure by the core Home Office and the UK Border Agency. The Identity and Passport Service figures are included from 2004-05 as 2002-03 and 2003-04 can be provided only at disproportionate cost. Figures for Criminal Records Bureau are excluded as these can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
For financial years 2002-03 and 2003-04, the figures also include expenditure by the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) and the Office for Criminal Justice Reform (OCJR) which transferred to Ministry of Justice in 2007. Their costs can be identified and deducted only at disproportionate cost.
The difference in costs over the period reflects the changing nature of the Home Office's business, in particular the growth of international terrorism and migration. Collaboration and information exchange both domestically and internationally on counter-terrorism activities and border control have become increasingly critical to the effective discharge of the Department's responsibilities for asylum, immigration and national security. This has involved higher levels of overseas and UK travel.
Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the UK Border Agency's budget for 2008-09 is, broken down by (a) staff, (b) equipment, (c) buildings and (d) other categories for which information is held centrally. 
Mr. Woolas: The following table provides the UK Borders Agency's budget broken down by spending category and includes (a) staff, (b) equipment and (c) buildings. In addition, the capital budget is provided and includes (b) equipment and (c) buildings:
|UK Border Agency|
|Spending type||2008-09 Budget (£000)|
Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much the UK Border Agency spent on (a) administrative and (b) operational matters in each of the last three years; and what its budget is on the same basis for 2008-09. 
Mr. Woolas: The following table provides the UK Borders Agencys spend on (a) administrative and (b) operational matters (programme spend) in each of the last three years along with the budget for 2008-09 on the same basis. 2008-09 includes the costs UK Visas operation that is transferring from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office:
|UK Border Agency|
|S pending type||2005-06||2006-07||2007-08||2008-09 budget|
Mr. Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people born outside the UK were (a) given work permits for and (b) employed in the care-related sector in each of the last 10 years. 
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she expects to answer question (a) (i) 203248, on counterfeit routers and (ii)
203249, on pilot schemes, tabled on 28 April 2008 and (b) 194334, on Ministerial taskforces and action groups, tabled on 11 March 2008. 
Mr. Woolas: It is not in the interests of the UK's national security for Departments to confirm whether they hold information about malicious attacks against their IT systems. I refer the hon. Gentleman to Cabinet Office guidance.
Mr. Lammy: Aimhigher is an important part of our policies to widen participation in higher education. Evidence from Excellence Challenge (a predecessor initiative which provided activities similar to those of Aimhigher) showed that, after just 18 months of the programme, it was having a significant effect on the aspirations of young people, and their attainment levels. The budget for Aimhigher for 2008-09 is £85.5 million, including contributions from the Higher Education Funding Council for England and the Department of Health. £3 million is for the new Aimhigher Associates initiative, which links undergraduates with young people at school or college to help them through educational transitions and into university.
Our policies are succeeding: the proportion of UK domiciled, young, full-time, first degree entrants to English higher education institutions who were from lower socio-economic groups rose from 27.9 per cent. in 2002/03 to 29.8 per cent. in 2006/07.
Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what progress has been made in preparation of a White Paper on higher education; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Lammy: We are currently hosting an ongoing debate on the future of higher education, with the aim of producing a framework document for the development of a world-class higher education system over the next 10 to 15 years.
We have recently received nine contributions from individuals and organisations involved in higher education. These will be published shortly. We have also commissioned seven users of higher education, employers from the private and public sectors, to provide reports on what they will need from higher education in the years to come to ensure that the UK remains internationally competitive. These reports are due to be completed by the end of November and will be published shortly afterwards.
Mr. Hunt: To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what progress has been made by the UK Intellectual Property Office in implementing a plan on intellectual property enforcement. 
Mr. Lammy: Since the Patent Office (now the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO)) launched its IP Crime Strategy in 2004, it has become a key player in co-ordinating efforts to deal with intellectual property enforcement in the UK and internationally. The UK-IPO is taking forward its plans for IP enforcement as set out in Commitment 16 of Creative Britain: New Talents for the New Economy (published in February 2008). It is funding an enforcement pilot related to the Fake Free London campaign. It is developing plans for a National Centre of Excellence on IP Crime. It is holding a consultation on penalties for copyright infringement (published 11 August, closes 31 October). The UK-IPO is also updating its IP Crime Strategy as the enforcement landscape has changed considerably in the past four years.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|