Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
28 Oct 2008 : Column 1010Wcontinued
Michael Gove: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what proportion of pupils studying for diplomas are eligible for free school meals. [226482]
Jim Knight: In summer 2009 we will have information about the proportions of pupils entered for diplomas, broken down by those eligible for free school meals for those pupils sitting examinations in 2009.
Mr. Hayes: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what plans he has to help rural schools collaborate in offering the diploma courses. [230054]
Sarah McCarthy-Fry: We have set out our assessments in Delivering 14-19 Reforms in Rural Areas, which we published on 30 June 2008. This report shows that rural and semi-rural areas face a particular set of challenges. We are committed to supporting these areas to overcome the challenges they face and know that many rural areas are already deploying a range of innovative solutions to ensure that young people get access to 14-19 provision.
Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what representations he has received on the difference in salary levels between further education lecturers and schoolteachers; and if he will make a statement. [229299]
Jim Knight: Following the machinery of government changes in 2007, responsibility for further education colleges falls to the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. I have not, therefore, received representations since that time about the relative levels of salaries payable to school teachers and further education lecturers.
However, the Government are not the employer of FE staff and DIUS is not involved in pay issues. Following enactment of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992, FE employers became independent institutions and pay in the FE sector is a matter for the staff and colleges concerned. Pay settlements for FE colleges and sixth form colleges are agreed in consultation with staff and their unions, without Government involvement in either national or local machinery.
Paul Rowen: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much was paid (a) by (i) employees and (ii) employers into and (b) to those receiving pensions payments from the teachers pension scheme in each of the last five years. [229432]
Jim Knight: The values of contributions received to each of the last five years are:
£000 | ||
Employer contributions | Employee contributions | |
The values of benefits paid (including lump sums) in each of the last five years are:
Pensions p aid (£000) | |
The figures are taken from the published teachers' pension scheme resource accounts and vary from those provided in my response to the hon. Member on 20 October 2008, Official Report, column 84W, which were provided on a cash basis.
Paul Rowen: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the annual change in cost to the public purse of the 2006 changes to the teachers' pension scheme; and if he will make a statement. [229491]
Jim Knight: Savings in employer contributions for the teachers' pensions scheme in 2007-08 have been estimated at around £280 million a year, and will grow in subsequent years in proportion to the growth in the salary bill.
Mr. Hoban: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many civil servants in his Department were seconded to work for (a) trades unions and (b) the Trades Union Congress in each year since its inception. [229107]
Sarah McCarthy-Fry: The Department was created on 28 June 2007 and since then nobody has been seconded to a trade union or to the Trades Union Congress.
In common with other Departments and agencies, my Department does provide agreed time off and facilities for trade union representatives to take part in trade union duties, activities and training.
Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many people aged 16 to 24 years old not in education, employment or training there were in each year since 1997, broken down by (a) constituency, (b) local authority and (c) region. [228730]
Beverley Hughes:
The data presented in the following table (i) are taken from the labour force survey (LFS). The table shows, for each Government office region, the estimated number of people aged 16 to 24 not in
employment, education or training (NEET) in the fourth quarter (October to December) of each year since 1997. Estimates are not available by constituency or by local authority.
Table (i): Number of 16 to 24-year-olds not in employment, education or training in quarter 4 of each year by region, 1997 to 2007 | ||||||||||
North East | North West | Yorkshire and the Humber | East Midlands | West Midlands | Eastern | London | South East | South West | England | |
Source: Labour Force Survey. |
The total number of 16 to 24-year-olds not in employment, education or training has risen since 1997, but this reflects an increase in the overall population. The proportion of 16 to 24-year-olds NEET remains unchanged (table (ii)).
Table ( i i): Percentage of 16 to 24-year-olds not in employment, education or training in quarter 4 of each year by region, 1997 to 2007 | ||||||||||
North East | North West | Yorkshire and the Humber | East Midlands | West Midlands | Eastern | London | South East | South West | England | |
Source: Labour Force Survey. |
Next Section | Index | Home Page |