Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
On the first issue of unfair dismissal and detriment during an industrial dispute, some of us might live in different worlds, but in my constituency and across the country people have been sacked unfairly on a number of occasions. They do not feel that they have the appropriate protections. My hon. Friend the Member for Wolverhampton, South-West (Rob Marris) made a point about international law and ILO conventions, and yes, we are in breach of them. We have consistently been in breach of them. Various international reports, which I listed earlier, have emphasised that point. We no longer have the standards of industrial and trade union rights in this country that apply across the rest of Europe. I was simply seeking to ensure that there would at least be a power for reinstatement. My right hon. Friend the Member for Makerfield (Mr. McCartney) raised the issue of reinstatement and said that in some instances that would be detrimental to the individual. Under new clause 1, that would have happened only if the complainant wished to be reinstated. It offered flexibility, so that there would be the right to secure ones job again.
I am also disappointed that there has been no movement on balloting. I acknowledged that the Government have taken steps on two occasions, in 1999 and 2004. We have cited example after example to show that in practice those steps have not enabled the democratic wishes of trade unionists undertaking a ballot to enable action to take place on the majority vote. The flexibility that we thought that we secured when I supported the Government in 1999 and 2004 is not being applied by the courts. We have given example after example of that.
An example was given that involved the buses. It is not just about employers having a duty to provide information in ballots. New clause 2 would place a duty on the employer reasonably to co-operate generally with a trade union while it engages in balloting action to test the wishes of its members. I do not believe that we have had an acceptable answer that demonstrates that the Government would even consider a timetable for addressing the practical problems that trade unions experience in this country.
We gave example after example of what agency workers have done to undermine industrial relations in this country. Let me give an example from my constituency. Before a dispute even took place, the employer, Gate Gourmet, went out and recruited agency workers and then herded my constituents into a shed and gave them three minutes to decide whether they would accept reduced wages and conditions. If they decided not to do so, they were replaced by agency workers. We are seeking to prevent such undermining. It does not just affect those individuals who are in dispute, but sours the industrial relations climate of this country.
We are appealing for some movement from the Government. The Minister said that he had received representations, but I was hoping that the Government would consider them seriously and that, after consultation, they would come forward with proposals to tackle the concrete problems of industrial relations and trade union rights in this country. I bitterly regret that they have not done so.
On that basis, and to save time this evening, I shall be happy to withdraw new clause 1. However, I wish to press new clause 2 on balloting procedures to a Division.
I beg to ask leave to withdraw the motion.
Motion and clause, by leave, withdrawn.
The following section is inserted after section 226C of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
226D Employers duties in relation to industrial action ballots
(1) It is the duty of an employer reasonably to co-operate generally, in connection with a ballot conducted or proposed for the purposes of section 226, with the trade union (or unions) and the person appointed to conduct the ballot.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), it is the duty of an employer to supply to a trade union in good time information reasonably requested by the trade union for the purposes of establishing the names, addresses, categories and workplaces of those members whom it wishes to ballot for the purposes of section 226... [John McDonnell.]
Brought up, and read the First time.
Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:
The House proceeded to a Division.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: I ask the Serjeant at Arms to investigate the delay in the No Lobby.
(1) The Employment Act 2002 (c.22) is amended as follows
(2) After section 43 there is inserted
43A Workplace Environmental Representatives
(1) An employer shall permit an employee of his who is
(a) a member of an independent trade union recognised by the employer, and
(b) a workplace environmental representative of the trade union, to take reasonable time off during his working hours for any of the following purposes.
(a) carrying out any of the following activities
(i) promoting environmentally sustainable workplace initiatives and practices,
(ii) carrying out environmental audits,
(iii) being consulted on workplace environmental policies, practices and management systems,
(iv) carrying out environmental risk assessments,
(b) consulting the employer about carrying out any such activities,
(c) preparing for any of the things mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b).
(3) Subsection (1) only applies if
(a) the trade union has given the employer notice in writing that the employee is a workplace environmental representative of the trade union, and
(b) the training condition is met in relation to him.
(4) The training condition is met if
(a) the employee has undergone sufficient training to enable him to carry on the activities mentioned in subsection (2), and the trade union has given the employer notice in writing of that fact,
(b) the trade union has in the last six months given the employer notice in writing that the employee will be undergoing such training, or
(c) within six months of the trade union giving the employer notice in writing that the employee will be undergoing such training, the employee has done so, and the trade union has given the employer notice of that fact.
(5) Only one notice under subsection (4)(b) may be given in respect of any one employee.
(6) References in subsection (4) to sufficient training to carry out the activities mentioned in subsection (2) are to training that is sufficient for those purposes having regard to any relevant provision of a Code of Practice issued by ACAS or the Secretary of State.
(7) If an employer is required to permit an employee to take time off under subsection (1), he shall also permit the employee to take time off during his working hours for the following purposes
(a) undergoing training which is relevant to his functions as a workplace environmental representative, and
(b) where the trade union has in the last six months given the employer notice under subsection (4)(b) in relation to the employee, undergoing such training as is mentioned in subsection (4)(a).
(8) The amount of time off which an employee is to be permitted to take under this section and the purposes for which, the occasions on which and any conditions subject to which time off may be so taken are those that are reasonable in all the circumstances having regard to any relevant provision of a Code of Practice issued by ACAS or the Secretary of State.
(9) An employee may present a complaint to an employment tribunal that his employer has failed to permit him to take time off as required by this section.
(10) References in subsection (2) to environmental audits and environmental risk assessments are to environmental audits and environmental risk assessments that are sufficient for those purposes having regard to any relevant provision of a Code of Practice issued by ACAS or the Secretary of State.
(11) In subsection (2)(a), the reference to qualifying members of the trade union is to members of the trade union
(a) who are employees of the employer of a description in respect of which the union is recognised by the employer, and
(b) in relation to whom it is the function of the workplace environmental representative to act as such.
(12) For the purposes of this section, a person is a workplace environmental representative of a trade union if he is appointed or elected as such in accordance with its rules.. [John McDonnell.]
Brought up, and read the First time.
John McDonnell: I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: With this it will be convenient to discuss the following: new clause 6 Right not to be excluded or expelled from union: repeal
In the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (c. 52) sections 174 to 177 (which make provision about the right to membership of trade union) are repealed..
Amendment No. 3, page 17, line 7, leave out clause 19.
Amendment No. 10, in clause 19, page 18, line 15, at end add
(4) In section 177 (interpretation and other supplementary provision), after subsection (2) there is inserted
(2A) For the purposes of section 174 an individual will only be considered to be a member of a political party if for the 12 months prior to the date of an individuals application for membership of the trade union or at any point thereafter that individual is registered with the political party as a member..
Amendment No. 11, page 18, line 15, clause 19, at end add
(4) In section 177 (interpretation and other supplementary provision), after subsection (2) there is inserted
(2A) For the purposes of section 174 a group will be considered to be a political party only where it has been registered with the Electoral Commission under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c. 41) or any foreign equivalent, and the party at the time of the individuals application for membership of the trade union remains on such a register..
Amendment No. 2, in schedule, page 21, line 21, at end add
Next Section | Index | Home Page |