Previous Section Index Home Page

4 Nov 2008 : Column 248W—continued


These figures do not include capital spending by local authorities funded through prudential borrowing, nor revenue spending by local authorities funded through general grant (paid by CLG) and council tax.

Data providing a comprehensive statement of private capital investment in these areas are not available.

The following table sets out the DEL spending shown above, expressed in real terms with a 2007-08 price base.


4 Nov 2008 : Column 249W

4 Nov 2008 : Column 250W
£ million (2007-08 prices)

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Public investment (capital)

Rail

1,101

3,487

3,051

2,752

3,706

3,496

Strategic Roads

841

487

659

797

1,150

1,056

London

883

Local and regional transport

1,732

1,700

1,847

1,650

1,710

2,364

Other transport

158

132

83

88

136

135

Public resource expenditure

Rail

330

1,232

1,560

1,290

1,362

1,163

Strategic Roads

1,531

1,684

1,532

1,668

1,805

1,787

London

1,172

2,829

2,442

2,309

2,721

2,400

Local and regional transport

388

427

439

457

558

659

Other transport

543

605

589

698

685

791


Transport: Regulatory Impact Assessments

Mr. Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will place in the Library copies of all regulatory impact assessments for (a) road projects and (b) other major transport infrastructure projects conducted since 1997. [232033]

Paul Clark: The Department for Transport does not undertake regulatory impact assessments for road or other transport infrastructure projects as they are not regulatory in nature. Infrastructure projects are assessed in line with the new approach to appraisal (NATA) guidance.

Transport: Tyne and Wear

Jim Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what payments his Department has made to local authorities in Tyne and Wear for a pilot study under the Transport Innovation Fund; and what plans he has for the future funding of People in Motion. [231944]

Paul Clark: Tyne and Wear authorities have received a total of £1.7 million pump priming funding from the Department for Transport's Transport Innovation Fund. This funding was provided to support the development of Transport Innovation Fund packages that address local congestion problems combining demand management, including road pricing, with better public transport. We are awaiting the outcome of the work that has been carried out by Tyne and Wear's People in Motion partnership.

Vehicle Number Plates

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to amend the Road Vehicles (Display of Registration Marks) Regulations 2001 to permit the voluntary display of the Union Flag or other national identifiers. [232311]

Jim Fitzpatrick [holding answer 3 November 2008]: We have announced our intention to allow the voluntary display of national flags on vehicle number plates in England, Scotland and Wales. We are looking at how this can be brought forward as soon as possible.

Mrs. Villiers: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will take steps to ensure that drivers may legally display the (a) Union Flag, (b) flag of Saint Andrew and (c) flag of Saint George on car registration plates. [232494]

Jim Fitzpatrick [holding answer 3 November 2008]: We have announced our intention to allow the voluntary display of national flags on vehicle number plates in England, Scotland and Wales. We are looking at how this can be brought forward as soon as possible.

Work and Pensions

Better Government for Older People

Mr. Andrew Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the sources of funding are of the Better Government for Older People initiative. [232813]

Ms Rosie Winterton: The information is in the following list..

Better Government for Older People Antici pated Sources of Funding 2008- 09

Community Allowance

Kerry McCarthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what recent discussions he has had with the Department for Communities and Local Government on the community allowance pilots. [231485]

Mr. McNulty: We jointly announced with the Department for Communities and Local Government in Communities in Control: real people, real power (CM7427) that the CREATE Consortium could pilot the community allowance within the existing benefits and permitted work structure. This was part of ongoing discussions with the Department for Communities and Local Government to explore how to promote paid community work for out of work benefit claimants to improve their chances of moving into work and benefit the community in which they live.


4 Nov 2008 : Column 251W

Kerry McCarthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will introduce a community allowance as part of the new employment and support allowance regime. [231487]

Mr. McNulty: We have always made clear that the CREATE consortium will be able to pilot the community allowance within the existing benefits and permitted work structure. We would want to see a full evaluation of the allowance and the impact on improving benefit claimants' chances of moving into work before we considered whether to introduce it more widely.

Compensation: Vaccination

Ian Stewart: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many claims under the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) have been made by people claiming damage by hepatitis A or hepatitis B vaccines; for what reasons unsuccessful claimants for payment in respect of these vaccines have been informed that if they wish to appeal they must do so within six years; and for what reason hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines are not included in the VDPS. [228905]

Jonathan Shaw: The Vaccine Damage Payments scheme only covers vaccines that are recommended as part of the routine childhood immunisation programme. The scheme does not cover hepatitis A or hepatitis B vaccines because they are not currently included in the childhood immunisation programme.

The Department does not collect information about the number of claims made by people claiming damage from hepatitis A or hepatitis B vaccines as this information is not required for the administration of the scheme.

People who make a vaccine damage payment claim in relation to vaccines not covered by the scheme are still given the right to appeal decisions they may disagree with. This practice helps ensure that customers have another opportunity to provide further information in support of their claim.

Council Tax Benefit

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many households were in receipt of council tax benefit in each year since 1985; and how much was spent on council tax benefit in each of those years. [229889]

Kitty Ussher: Information on council tax benefit is available only from 1993-94 when it was introduced. The available information is in the following tables:


4 Nov 2008 : Column 252W
Council tax benefit expenditure and recipients, Great Britain

Expenditure (£ million) Caseload (Thousand)

1993-94

1,940

5,450

1994-95

2,077

5,615

1995-96

2,189

5,690

1996-97

2,311

5,618

1997-98

2,395

5,479

1998-99

2,452

5,306

1999-2000

2,511

5,051

2000-01

2,575

4,761

2001-02

2,686

4,664

2002-03

2,834

4,625

2003-04

3,223

4,693

2004-05

3,557

4,915

2005-06

3,774

5,029

2006-07

3,944

5,080

2007-08

4,023

5,089

Notes: 1. The expenditure figures presented here reflect nominal costs for the whole of Great Britain. 2. They are total amounts paid to beneficiaries, irrespective of the source of funding, and include benefit spending reimbursed by DWP, and benefit spending financed from local authorities' general funds. 3. They reflect the latest benefit-by-benefit estimate of outturn, and not the amounts voted by Parliament. 4. Figures for 2006-07 and 2007-08 are estimated outturn and may change slightly once subsidy returns from all local authorities are audited. 5. Council tax benefit was introduced in April 1993. Source: Published expenditure tables to 2006-07, and estimated outturn for 2007-08.

Council Tax Benefits: Greater London

Mr. Randall: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people he estimates were (a) eligible for and (b) in receipt of council tax benefits in (i) London, (ii) the London Borough of Hillingdon and (iii) Uxbridge constituency in each year since 1997 for which figures are available. [231801]

Kitty Ussher: Estimates of the numbers eligible for council tax benefit are not available below the level of Great Britain. It is, therefore, not possible to provide estimates of the numbers entitled in London, the London borough of Hillingdon, and the constituency of Uxbridge.

The available information on recipients of council tax benefit for London and the London borough of Hillingdon is in the following table. Information is not available broken down by parliamentary constituency.

Number of council tax benefit recipients in London and the London borough of Hillingdon: as at May each year

London Hillingdon

1997

759,720

17,660

1998

728,260

17,520

1999

692,540

17,350

2000

628,650

16,980

2001

607,160

16,360

2002

615,320

16,090

2003

633,530

15,810

2004

672,070

17,360

2005

708,440

17,890

2006

717,610

18,140

2007

724,440

18,200

Notes:
1. Recipients refers to benefit units, which may be a single person or a couple.
2. The figures have been rounded to the nearest 10.
3. Figures for any non-responding authorities have been estimated.
4. Council tax benefit totals exclude any second adult rebate cases.
Source:
Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Quarterly 100 per cent. caseload stock-count taken in May 1997 to May 2007

Next Section Index Home Page