Mr. Maude: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what the amount of (a) domestic, (b) short haul and (c) long haul air mileage of hon. Members used to calculate the House payment to the Government Carbon Offsetting Fund was in each year that the House has been a member of the Offsetting Fund. 
Gwyn Prosser: To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission if the Commission will develop a workplace travel plan to reduce the environmental impact of travel by House staff. 
Nick Harvey: Staff are encouraged to use bicycles through the provision of bicycle loans and cycle racks, and are encouraged to use public transport through the provision of season ticket loans. The possibility of developing a sustainable travel to work policy will be considered as part of developing the Houses environmental strategy.
Mr. Garnier: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much his Department has paid to the Cooperative Wholesale Society or its farming division in respect of (a) UK and (b) EU payments for the production at its Stoughton Farm Estate in Harborough of (i) wheat, (ii) barley, (iii) oats, (iv) other cereal crops, (v) oil seed rape, (vi) beans and (vii) all other arable farm produce in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available; and in each case what tonnage was in respect of which the payment was made. 
Mr. Cameron: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much public funding is being provided to each Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in 2008-09; and what account is taken of the size of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty in determining the allocation of funding to them. 
Huw Irranca-Davies: The responsibility for funding Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) rests with Natural England and Defra would not interfere in the decisions Natural England takes in setting the budget of any AONB.
The funding for AONBs consists of three elements: core funding for staff and essential administrative costs; projects; and the Sustainable Development Fund. In 2008-09 Natural England has been able to add 2 per cent. to AONB core grants. Core funding is based on a formula which, among other factors, takes into account the area of each AONB. However, funding for projects has had to be prioritised to those of highest importance and those which AONB partnerships are locked into, such as Heritage Lottery Fund schemes. As for the Sustainable Development Fund, each AONB can bid for up to £61,666 from Natural England. There is, therefore, no strict correlation between the area of any one AONB and the amount of total funding it receives and it is inappropriate to relate the total funding of any AONB to its area.
Tim Farron: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much his Department has spent on its communications campaign to promote uptake of the bluetongue vaccination in each year since its inception. 
Jane Kennedy [holding answer 10 November 2008]: In line with the core group of industry stakeholders, the Government consider that mass vaccination through the 2008 programme for Bluetongue type 8 (the only programme so far) can be best and most rapidly achieved through a voluntary approach, supported by an industry-led campaign promoting the benefits of vaccination. DEFRA has contributed to the industry campaign by giving prominence to bluetongue messages in its existing communications channels, e.g. website, advertising in farming press and campaigns such as Livestock Market Roadshows and the website-based Give Disease the Boot campaign. In addition, DEFRA has worked with the Animal Health Agency to alert local veterinary surgeons and others to the availability of vaccine as it has been rolled out across England.
These costs for bluetongue vaccination campaigns are not available separately. However, the overall indicative budget for Livestock Markets Roadshows and Animal Disease Prevention communications (excluding publications, Farming Link and shows) is £400,000 in the current financial year. In the 2007-08 financial year, the total spend amounted to approximately £280,000.
Mr. Chope: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what the carbon footprint of the New Forest National Park was in the latest period for which figures are available; and (a) by what means and (b) to what extent it will be reduced if the draft Recreation Management Strategy is adopted; 
Huw Irranca-Davies [holding answers 16 and 17 October 2008]: Carbon footprint figures are not currently available by National Park boundary. There are technical hurdles to producing such figures which DEFRA is currently exploring, and I shall write to the hon. Member before the end of the year to report progress.
Mr. Yeo: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion of the electricity consumption that the Government sources from combined heat and power is obtained from combined heat and power stations located on the Government estate. 
There are 10 combined heat and power (CHP) schemes located on the Government estate registered with the Governments CHP Quality Assurance programme (CHPQA). In 2007-08 these 10 schemes produced just over 19 gigawatt hours of Good Quality CHP electricity. This represents around 0.1 per cent. of the 28,677 gigawatts electricity produced in total by Good Quality CHP plants in the UK in 2007.
Early information from the Sustainable Development Commission (SDC) as part of its annual Sustainable Development in Government (SDiG) report indicates that total CHP generated electricity consumed on the Government estate in 2007-08 was 311 gigawatt hours. This would mean that the 19 gigawatt hours of Good Quality CHP electricity generated on the Government estate represents round 6 per cent. of the total CHP electricity consumed on the Government estate in 2007-08.
Mr. Leech: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what consideration he has given to the introduction of binding regulations to provide that timber used in new buildings is sourced in a legal and sustainable manner. 
Huw Irranca-Davies: The UK Government's Forest Governance and Trade Programme aims to tackle illegal logging and trade associated with it. It works to promote governance reforms in developing countries where illegal logging is a problem, and to improve the functioning of markets for wood products. Efforts focus on negotiating and implementing bilateral Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) between timber-producing countries and the EU, as part of the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action Plan.
The European Commission published recently a proposal for legislation requiring traders in timber to exercise due diligence to ensure that the timber they buy and sell is legally harvested. Once the regulation is agreed, the new requirements will ensure that legally harvested timber only is traded in the EU.
The UK has lobbied hard for Community-wide measures to exclude illegal timber from the European market. This legislation will support the Government's efforts under the FLEGT Action Plan, which provides support to timber-producing countries who have problems with illegal logging to verify the legality of timber exports. The UK seeks to work in collaboration with other EU member states in preference to unilaterally introducing binding regulations.
|Consultancy expenditure (£)|
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|