Mr. Pickles:
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether (a) HM Revenue and Customs and (b) the Valuation Office Agency (i) have and (ii) will have access to data from the National Register of Social Housing. [235080]
Mr. Iain Wright:
Neither HM Revenue and Customs nor the Valuation Office Agency currently have access to data from the National Register of Social Housing (NROSH). Any request for access to NROSH from a Government Department would be considered on its specific and individual merits.
Multiple Occupation: Coastal Areas
Chris Ruane:
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many conversions from houses of multiple occupation to flats have taken place in each of the 37 principal seaside towns in England in each of the last five years. [235186]
Mr. Iain Wright:
The information requested is not held centrally.
Justice
Community Orders
Miss McIntosh:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many community sentences have been completed in each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement. [234041]
Mr. Malik:
The following table shows the number of community sentences that terminated in England and Wales for 2005-07. It also provides the percentage split for the reason of termination, including the percentage that completed successfully (those that ran their full course and that terminated early for good progress).
The improvement in positive terminations for non-community orders reflects the fact that these are pre-Criminal Justice Act 2003 sentences and were only given for offences committed before 4 April 2005. Negative terminations tend to occur earlier in the life of an order, leaving a higher proportion of these orders to terminate successfully over the course of time.
12 Nov 2008 : Column 1152W
The information contained in this table can be found in chapter 5 of Offender Management Caseload Statistics 2007 located online at:
Terminations of community sentences by reason, England and Wales
Number of persons and percentages
2005
2006
2007
Community order
Ran their full course
(1)
39
47
Terminated early for:
Good progress
(1)
13
10
Failure to comply with requirements
(1)
24
22
Conviction of an offence
(1)
14
12
Other reasons
(1)
10
10
All community orders (=100%) (number)
(1)
70,577
113,829
Drug treatment and testing order
Ran their full course
32
50
59
Replaced by conditional discharge order
0
0
0
Terminated early for:
Good progress
7
9
8
Failure to comply with requirements
23
19
17
Conviction of an offence
33
18
12
Other reasons
6
5
4
All DTTOs (=100%) (number)
8,088
3,992
630
Community rehabilitation order
Ran their full course
58
69
77
Replaced by conditional discharge order
1
1
0
Terminated early for:
Good progress
10
8
6
Failure to comply with requirements
8
7
6
Conviction of offence
19
11
6
Other reasons
5
4
4
All CROs (=100%) (number)
50,745
31,216
9,380
Community rehabilitation order element of community punishment and rehabilitation order
Ran their full course
45
59
65
Replaced by conditional discharge order
1
0
0
Terminated early for:
Good progress
12
11
6
Failure to comply with requirements
13
10
12
Conviction of offence
23
14
10
Other reasons
6
5
7
All CPROs =100%) (number)
12,607
9,000
3,171
Community punishment order
Specified hours completed
68
62
46
Failure to comply with requirements
11
14
21
Conviction of an offence
11
12
10
Other change in circumstances
3
3
3
Warrant unexecuted
2
3
5
Other reason
5
6
16
All CPOs (=100%) (number)
49,081
23,762
9,967
Community punishment order element of community punishment and rehabilitation order
Specified hours completed
60
54
40
Failure to comply with requirements
13
15
20
Conviction of an offence
18
18
14
Other change in circumstances
3
4
3
Warrant unexecuted
2
2
3
12 Nov 2008 : Column 1153W
Other reason
5
7
19
All CPROs(=100%) (number)
13,919
6,288
2,510
(1) Community orders that commenced in 2005 had not had sufficient time to terminate normally since they were only introduced on 4 April 2005. Note:
The figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.
Departmental Information Officers
Mr. Hunt:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much was spent on salaries for press and communications officers in (a) his Department, (b) its non-departmental public bodies and (c) its agencies in each of the last three years. [231339]
Maria Eagle:
The information requested is shown in the following table.
Press and communications officers cover a wide range of tasks including internal communications, intranet and internet operations, event organisation, marketing, publication production and stakeholder relations.
Ministry of Justice spend on salaries for press and communications officers in the last three years
£
Communications officers
Press officers
Total
2005-06
Ministry of Justice HQ
(1)
(1)
(1)2,626,355.00
HMCS
(1)
(1)
(1)217,420.90
OPG
(1)
(1)
(1)139,662.29
National Archives
104,306.00
130,250.00
234,556.00
Tribunals(2)
n/a
n/a
Boundary Commission for England(3)
Boundary Commission for Wales(3)
JAC(4)
JCO(2)
n/a
n/a
LSC
678,410.80
132,797.41
811,208.21
Land Registry
453,013.00
95,310.00
548,323.00
2006-07
Ministry of Justice HQ
1,736,925.00
723,488.00
2,520,413.00
HMCS
400,527.39
112,492.00
513,019.39
OPG
(1)
(1)
(1)167,863.53
National Archives
184,966.00
139,325.00
324,291.00
Tribunals
210,009.70
37,415.74
247,425.44
Boundary Commission for England(3)
Boundary Commission for Wales(3)
JAC(4)
JCO
198,332.12
95,715.23
294,047.35
LSC
628,223.17
164,631.60
792,854.77
Land Registry
451,883.00
110,993.00
562,876.00
2007-08
Ministry of Justice HQ
2,286,346.00
1,560,439.00
3,846,785.00
HMCS
438,671.88
158,653.00
597,324.88
OPG
(1)
(1)
(1)173,205.50
National Archives
166,115.00
135,398.75
301,513.75
Tribunals
190,223.24
55,455.34
245,678.58
12 Nov 2008 : Column 1154W
Boundary Commission for England(3)
Boundary Commission for Wales(3)
JAC(4)
JCO
211,776.20
107,582.31
319,358.51
LSC
668,696.22
175,230.95
844,92717
Land Registry
481,017.00
99,994.00
581,011.00
(1) Joint budget (2) Formed in April 2006 (3) No press office and all queries are dealt with by its secretariat (4 )No dedicated resource