Previous Section Index Home Page

18 Nov 2008 : Column 296W—continued


Agriculture: Subsidies

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will place in the Library a copy of the most recent inspection report of the Rural Payments Agency by the Office of the Surveillance Commissioner that is held by the Rural Payments Agency. [235065]

Huw Irranca-Davies: The last report on the Rural Payments Agency (RPA) by the Office of Surveillance Commissioner (OSC) was in 2004. As the report includes sensitive information on the areas and use of covert investigation techniques under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), including the resources available, it would be inappropriate to place the report in the Library.

The Interception of Communications Commissioner, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner and the Intelligence Service Commissioner, who each have particular inspection and oversight responsibilities under RIPA, publish annual reports. The latest reports were laid before Parliament and copies placed in the House Library on 22 July. The figures provided in the reports for use of specific covert techniques are not broken down by individual public authority. The question of further disclosure for any particular public authority is a matter for the relevant commissioner.

Mr. Morley: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the likely effect of proposals under the CAP Health Check to remove cross-compliance rules which allow for a reduction in payments for claimants who permit their land to be used for illegal poisoning of birds of prey. [235937]

Huw Irranca-Davies: The protection of wild birds, their eggs and nests is currently subject to cross compliance rules. The CAP Health Check will not remove the requirement relating to the deliberate killing (including killing by poisoning) of wild birds. However, the requirements to prohibit the taking of wild birds' eggs, keeping wild birds and using non-selective means of hunting, capture or killing are likely to be removed. The Government accept that farmers are unlikely to take wild birds eggs or take birds from the wild for keeping in captivity, however, the Government have argued against the removal of the prohibition on non-selective means of hunting, capture or killing birds. My Department considers that this aspect may be beneficial in dealing
18 Nov 2008 : Column 297W
with cases of illegal poisoning in addition to the main offence of deliberate killing. However, this is not a view widely held by other member states or the European Commission.

The UK has not yet conducted an impact assessment, but may do so when the Health Check concludes in December.

Under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 the taking and killing of wild birds using poison remains an offence, with penalties of up to £5,000 and/or up to six months imprisonment.

Badgers

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his policy is on the use of rodenators to control badgers. [236223]

Huw Irranca-Davies: Under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 it is prohibited to use any explosive other than ammunition for a firearm for the purpose of killing or taking any wild animal. My Department believes that the product called the Rodenator and similar devices are explosive devices and their use for these purposes is thus prohibited.

The 1981 Act includes provisions for the granting of licences allowing the use of prohibited methods for certain purposes where suitably justified. The assessment of individual applications would be carried out on DEFRA's behalf by Natural England within a policy framework set by DEFRA. DEFRA's policy is that licences should be considered only if it can be demonstrated to DEFRA's satisfaction that the method is humane and effective. DEFRA's position statement on Rodenator and similar devices can be found on our website.

Under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 it is prohibited, without a licence, to wilfully take or kill a badger, or to interfere with a badger sett. Therefore a licence under the 1992 Act would also be needed to use the Rodenator to take or kill badgers, or to interfere with a badger sett. The assessment of individual applications is carried out on DEFRA's behalf by Natural England within a policy framework set by DEFRA. This policy document is also available on our website.

Carbon Emissions: New Forest

Mr. Chope: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the Answer of 10 November 2008, Official Report, columns 769-70W, on carbon emissions: New Forest, (1) what the effect of the technical constraints is on the policy of whether traffic on the A31 trunk road should be included in the carbon footprint of the New Forest National Park Authority; [236526]

(2) what carbon footprint figures are available for the A31 trunk road; [236530]

(3) whether carbon footprint figures are available for any parts of (a) the New Forest National Park, (b) the New Forest District Council area and (c) the Hampshire County Council area; [236531]

(4) what the technical hurdles referred to are; and when they were first identified. [236532]

Huw Irranca-Davies [holding answer 17 November 2008]: The technical hurdles to producing carbon dioxide
18 Nov 2008 : Column 298W
emissions figures for the New Forest National Park concern aggregation of available spatially disaggregated data to the boundaries of the park, and merging data for emissions and removals due to land use with other emissions. These issues have been known generically for a long time and apply in general to producing geographically disaggregated estimates. My Department routinely produces estimates for local authority areas, but not national park boundaries. I anticipate that the technical constraints will not prevent inclusion of emission from the A31 Trunk Road in the carbon footprint of the national park, and it should be possible to produce emissions estimates for other sections of the A31. My response later in the year, promised in my previous answer of 10 November 2008, Official Report, columns 769-70W, will set out these issues in more detail.

Departmental Catering

Mr. Heald: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was spent on entertainment by his Department in 2007-08; and how much of that sum is accounted for by expenditure on (a) food, (b) alcohol, (c) staff and (d) accommodation. [233255]

Huw Irranca-Davies: The core-Department holds no information centrally on the expenditure category of entertainment.

Departmental Energy

Tim Farron: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much his Department spent on (a) electricity and (b) heating in each month of each of the last five years. [235366]

Huw Irranca-Davies [holding answer 13 November 2008]: The Secretary of State is unable to provide data broken down by month but can provide costs for electricity, gas and oil over the five-year period as shown in the following table:

£
Electricity cost Gas cost Oil cost Total cost

2006-07

5,761,472

2,693,817

80,233

8,535,522

2005-06

4,160,771

2,043,127

101,369

6,305,267

2004-05

2,779,828

1,565,374

62,085

4,407,287

2003-04

2,361,546

1,550,061

72,089

3,983,696

2002-06

2,583,077

1,471,808

99,671

4,154,556


The Sustainable Development Commission has not yet verified energy data for 2007-08 so we are unable to provide this information.

Departmental Expenditure

Mr. Peter Ainsworth: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his Department's expenditure was on consultants for (a) management, (b) media and public relations, (c) design, (d) information technology, (e) recruitment, (f) research, (g) marketing, (h) public affairs and (i) training in each year since 2001. [233590]


18 Nov 2008 : Column 299W

Huw Irranca-Davies: This information could be provided only at disproportionate cost. I refer the hon. Member to pages 133 and 141 of DEFRA's Departmental Report 2008.

Departmental Internet

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many unique visitors there were to his Departmental website in the latest period for which figures are available. [231940]

Mr. Heald: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many page hits his Department’s website received in 2007-08; and how many visitors it had. [233250]

Huw Irranca-Davies: Details of page views, and unique visitors, to www.defra.gov.uk are as follows for the period from January 2007 to March 2008:

Month Page views Unique visitors

January 2007

7,897,493

463,278

February 2007

7,168,703

454,404

March 2007

6,305,847

464,599

April 2007

5,923,718

440,434

May 2007

6,123,164

472,407

June 2007

5,887,534

397,278

July 2007

3,702,581

281,650

August 2007

7,465,179

563,665

September 2007

7,127,162

549,364

October 2007

6,515,290

538,359

November 2007

6,239,148

489,447

December 2007

5,298,042

352,346

January 2008

6,232,896

471,100

February 2008

5,162,162

464,058

March 2008

5,576,376

490,557


Departmental Liability

Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on what dates in each of the last five years his Department informed the House of the creation of contingent liabilities relating to his Department or its non-departmental public bodies. [232729]

Huw Irranca-Davies: Within the five year period 2004 to 2008, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs informed the House of a contingent liability by laying a specific minute on only one occasion. On 6 October 2008, the Department informed the House that we wished to issue a Letter of Comfort to the Covent Garden Market Authority.

The notes to the Department’s annual resource accounts also identify contingent liabilities and these were laid before the House on the following dates:


18 Nov 2008 : Column 300W
Accounts Date

2003-04

28 October 2004

2004-05

10 October 2005

2005-06

30 October 2006

2006-07

29 October 2007

2007-08

17 July 2008


Departmental Manpower

Mr. Heald: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many full-time equivalent press officers (a) work and (b) provide assistance for his Department. [233252]

Huw Irranca-Davies: DEFRA currently employs 16 full-time press office and media relations staff and one part-time press officer.

Departmental Official Visits

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was spent on overnight accommodation by his Department's civil servants in the last 12 months. [228769]

Huw Irranca-Davies: From information held centrally, the core-Department's VAT inclusive expenditure on overnight accommodation for the period July 2007 to June 2008 inclusive was £2,643,363.32. Information on overnight accommodation by all of DEFRA's executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Planning Permission

Mr. Maude: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 1 September 2008, Official Report, column 1484W, on departmental planning permission, what the address of the building was for each application; what type of permission was applied for in each case; and what licensing hours were requested in the licensing application. [233587]

Huw Irranca-Davies: The addresses of each site for the Departmental planning applications, included in the answer of 1 September 2008 , Official Report, column 1484W, and the type of application submitted are set out in the following table.

The licensing hours requested for the site club bar at the Epsom Road, Guildford site were 24 hours, seven days a week. This was to bring the sports and social club into line with new licensing laws. The site has now been sold.


Next Section Index Home Page