House of Commons |
Session 2007 - 08 Publications on the internet General Committee Debates Banking Bill |
Banking Bill |
The Committee consisted of the following Members:Alan
Sandall, Mick Hillyard, Committee
Clerks attended the
Committee WitnessesEmil
Levendoğlu, Team Leader, Financial Stability Banking Reform,
HM Treasury John Footman,
Executive Director, Central Services, Bank of
England Nigel Jenkinson,
Executive Director, Financial Stability, Bank of
England Dr. Thomas
Huertas, Director, Banking Sector, Financial Services
Authority Loretta
Minghella, Chief Executive, Financial Services Compensation
Scheme Public Bill CommitteeTuesday 21 October 2008(Morning)[Mr. Jim Hood in the Chair]Banking Bill10.30
am
The
Chairman: Before we begin, I have a few preliminary
announcements. Members may, if they wish, remove their jackets during
Committee meetings. Will all Members please ensure that all mobile
phones, pagers and other electronic devices are turned off or on to
silent mode? If something goes off while on silent mode, I ask Members
to switch it off or, if they are going to answer it, to leave the
Committee
Room. There
is a money resolution and a Ways and Means resolution in connection
with the Bill, and copies are available in the room. I remind hon.
Members to give adequate notice of amendments. As a general rule, my
fellow Chairmen and I do not intend to call starred amendments,
including any starred amendments that may be reached during an
afternoon sitting of the
Committee. First,
the Committee will consider the programme motion on the amendment
paper, for which debate is limited to half an hour. We will then
proceed to a motion to report written evidence, and then to a motion to
permit the Committee to deliberate in private in advance of the oral
evidence sessions. I hope that we can deal with that
formally. Assuming
that the second motion is agreed to, the Committee will move into
private session. Once the Committee has deliberated, the witnesses and
members of the public will be invited back into the room and our oral
evidence session will commence. If the Committee agrees to the
programme motion, it will hear oral evidence this morning and this
afternoon. From Thursday, we will revert to the familiar process of
clause-by-clause scrutiny of the
Bill.
That (1)
the Committee shall (in addition to its first meeting at 10.30 a.m. on
Tuesday 21st October)
meet (a)
at 4.30 p.m. on Tuesday 21st
October; (b)
at 9.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. on Thursday 23rd
October; (c)
at 10.30 a.m. and 4.30 p.m. on Tuesday 28th
October; (d)
at 9.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. on Thursday 30th
October; (e)
at 10.30 a.m. and 4.30 p.m. on Tuesday 4th
November; (f)
at 9.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. on Thursday 6th
November; (g)
at 10.30 a.m. and 4.30 p.m. on Tuesday 11th
November; (h)
at 9.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. on Thursday 13th
November; (i)
at 10.30 a.m. and 4.30 p.m. on Tuesday 18th
November; (2)
the Committee shall hear oral evidence in accordance with the
following
(3)
proceedings on consideration of the Bill in Committee shall be taken in
the following order: Clauses 155 and 156; Clauses 158 to 233; Clauses 1
to 76; Clause 157; Clauses 77 to 154; Clauses 234 to 240; new Clauses;
new Schedules; remaining proceedings on the
Bill; (4) the
proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a
conclusion at 7.00 p.m. on Tuesday 18th
November. Thank
you for your helpful guidance, Mr. Hood. It is a pleasure to
see you presiding over us today. I am sure that all members of the
Committee will benefit from your guidance, and that of Mr.
Gale, as we proceed through the scrutiny stages of the Bill. We had an
encouraging Second Reading, which reflected the widespread support, on
both sides of the House, for the principles and much of the content of
the Bill. However, I appreciate that there are issues of detail that
deserve full consideration, and I look forward to addressing those in
Committee. On
14 October, the House agreed a programme motion that provides for the
Committees proceedings to conclude on 18 November. On 16
October the Programming Sub-Committee agreed a programme resolution for
the Committee. The resolution provides for oral evidence to be
presented in two sittings today. It also provides for discussions of
the Bill to take parts 4 to 7 first, minus clause 157, which relates to
part 1. We will then take parts 1 to 3that is, clauses 1 to 154
plus 157; and then part 8that is, clause 234 to clause 240,
plus any new clauses and schedules.
As I
explained at Second Reading, the ordering is primarily to provide
additional time to bring forward drafts of some of the key documents,
including the code of practice for the special resolution regime,
required under clause 5. I hope that hon. Members find the arrangements
set out in the resolution satisfactory.
Mr.
Mark Hoban (Fareham) (Con): I welcome you to the Chair,
Mr. Hood. We look forward to working under your
chairmanship, and that of Mr. Gale and, for a brief spell,
Mr. Illsley.
As the
Minister said in his opening remarks, there was broad support for the
Bill at Second Reading. There was also a commitment, on our part, to
ensure that the Bill has a smooth passage through the House and the
other place, to enable it to reach the statute book before the Banking
(Special Provisions) Act 2008 expires in February 2009. We are grateful
to the Minister for arranging the reordering of the consideration of
the Bill, because we believe it is important that there is time to
study the draft code of practice and the principal regulations
underlying this Bill prior to the debate on part 1. It would be helpful
if the Minister were to indicate when he expects the draft code and
regulations to be published, because that would clearly impact on the
speed of consideration in Committee.
Despite the
broad support for the Bill, there are areas that we will want to probe
in detail between now and 18 November. I am sure we can do that and
ensure proper scrutiny of the
Bill. Dr.
John Pugh (Southport) (LD): Some members of the Committee
might be disappointed that the Liberal Democrats are not represented by
the sage of Twickenham on this occasion. We will be led by my hon.
Friend the Member for South-East Cornwall (Mr. Breed) who is
unfortunately out of the country at the moment. He has appreciable
experience of both retail and investment banking. We have no objection
to or difficulty with the programme motion as this is an important and
highly technical bit of legislation.
Many
representations made by the banking industry and others recommend a
holistic approach. People are concerned about what may be caught up in
the code of practice or secondary legislation. I welcome the
Ministers assurances that as much as possible will be put
before the Committee during its deliberations and as much inkling as
possible will be given about the future secondary legislation that
follows in its wake.
Question
put and agreed to.
Ordered, That, subject to the discretion of the Chairman, any written evidence received by the Committee shall be reported to the House for publication.[Ian
Pearson.]
The
Chairman: Copies of any memorandums that the Committee
receives will be available in the Committee
Room. Ordered, That,
at this and any subsequent meeting at which oral evidence is to be
heard, the Committee shall sit in private until the witnesses are
admitted.[Ian
Pearson.] 10.38
am The
Committee deliberated in
private. 10.56
am On
resuming
The
Chairman: We shall now hear oral evidence from the
Treasury. I welcome the Minister and Mr. Levendoğlu.
Minister, would you like to make a brief introductory statement, or to
proceed straight to the Committees
questions?
Ian
Pearson: I should like to make a brief introductory
statement. The Banking Bill to be scrutinised by the Committee is being
brought forward during challenging times for financial markets and
economies across the world. The Bill is one important part of a package
of action and reform to improve the UK system for ensuring financial
stability and protecting depositors. I am encouraged that the Bill
received cross-party support on Second Reading. It was disappointing
that the Leader of the official Opposition seemed to go back on that in
his speech to the City on Friday, which showed a complete lack of
judgment and sought to play party politics rather than act in the
national
interest.
Ian
Pearson: The measures in the Bill are designed to
form a permanent reform of the UK framework. I want to emphasise that
it is the result of a comprehensive process of consultation, which we
could discuss in more detail, including three consultation
documentations issued jointly by the Treasury, the Bank and the
Financial Services Authority. We have consulted with key industry
players and experts, many of whom we shall hear from later today. We
have had valuable input from the Houses Select Committee on the
Treasury. We want to get the reforms
right. I
say from the outset that the measures in the Bill represent a
proportionate and sound package for reform. However, we shall go into
Committee with an open and consultative frame of mind. The Government
have made the correct decision in taking the past few months to develop
the legislative package, including publishing some of the key clauses
in draft, for public debate and scrutiny over the summer. The Bill will
provide a sound enhancement to the framework for financial stability
and depositor protection. I am happy to take questions on any aspect of
the
Bill.
|
| |
©Parliamentary copyright 2008 | Prepared 22 October 2008 |