Memorandum submitted by North Lincolnshire Council (PB
27)
PLANNING
BILL 2007
I write in response to your consultation on the Planning
Bill 2007.
The council has grave concerns that the proposals in
relation to major infrastructure projects by removing them from determination
by Local Planning Authorities will result in a loss of democratic
accountability. The council believes that it is important that locally elected
and accountable people with local knowledge take decisions on proposals that,
by definition, have a major impact on their area. The council is also concerned
at the lack of democratic accountability or parliamentary scrutiny over the
proposed Commission, the lack
of an individual's right to be heard in
person, throughout the inquiry, in the proposed Commission's inquiries and
generally as to how local concerns will be dealt with. If the National Policy
Statements are to be prepared it is vital that local planning authorities are
given a special role rather than simply being treated as ordinary consultees.
The
council also objects to the proposed changes to the appeals process. It
believes that applicants will no longer feel that their application has been
independently assessed when an appeal has been determined by the council's own
planning committee or a sub-committee. The reason advanced for this proposed
change appears to be an acceptance that the Planning Inspectorate cannot cope
with the current level of appeals nationally. We respectfully suggest that this
is a resource issue for Government to resolve. If the Bill is not changed it
will have the effect of placing much of the responsibility down at the Local
authority level and councillors in particular to hear appeals against their own
officers, a process which does not have the independence of the present system.
The council could not support the introduction of a fee for
lodging an appeal Applicants have
already paid a fee to the LPA to get a decision on their application and should
not have to pay twice if it goes to appeal.
January 2008