Select Committee on Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Equal Opportunities Commission

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Equal Opportunities Commission (the EOC) is a statutory body whose duties are to work towards the elimination of sex discrimination and to promote equality of opportunity between men and women generally. The EOC welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence to the Trade and Industry Committee's Inquiry into the implementation of the report of the Women and Work Commission (the WWC) Shaping a Fairer Future.

  2.  The pay gap is a major issue with a number of complex, inter-related causes and action to tackle it cannot be achieved without the buy in of key stakeholders. The EOC therefore very much welcomes the ambitious and wide-ranging recommendations of the WWC report and the fact that consensus amongst those involved has been achieved in so many key areas. We would like to pay tribute to the key role of Baroness Prosser in achieving this consensus in this important report. The leadership shown by the Prime Minister, Chancellor and Minister for Women in launching the report is also extremely welcome and we look forward to the new Minister for Women's action plan for taking it forward.

  3.  The Chair of the EOC was a member of the WWC and was therefore closely involved in drawing up the report; and we will be working in partnership with Government to help take some of the action plan forward.

  4.  In this submission we will look first at the productivity gap and then comment briefly on each of the main areas in the WWC report: maximising potential; combining work and family life; lifelong opportunities for women in training and work and workplace practices.

THE PRODUCTIVITY GAP

  5.  We welcome in particular Shaping a Fairer Future's recognition of the fact that closing the gender pay gap would add as much as £23 billion to the UK economy. These findings are confirmed by a number of our recent completed and ongoing general formal investigations, as set out below.

OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION AND SKILL SHORTAGES

  6.  Our investigation into occupational segregation, completed in March 2005, discovered a clear correlation between the employment sectors where women were under-represented and skill shortages, showing that occupational segregation was causing employers to miss out on a huge potential pool of labour with which to plug their skills gaps. Despite many young people being interested in non-traditional work experience, training and work, and many employers recognising that recruiting more women could address skills shortages and bring business benefits, the Investigation showed that Britain was failing to open up real opportunity and choice for girls and boys entering work via vocational routeways. The current "education to training to work" system was particularly failing girls from lower socio-economic groups—the young women most in need of support—by channeling them into generally lower paid training and jobs than young men and not opening up wider and better paid opportunities.

PART-TIME WORKERS WORKING BELOW THEIR POTENTIAL

  7.  Our Investigation into Part-time and Flexible Working found that the way in which Britain's flexible and part-time working arrangements are structured results in their failing to meet the needs of working women and men, leaving 5.6 million people (four out of five of Britain's seven million part-time workers) working in jobs that do not use their potential. Our Investigation found that over 3.5 million of these workers had actually used higher qualifications or skills or had had more supervision/management of staff in previ1ous jobs, while a further two million believed they could "easily work at a higher level." [16]

PAKISTANI, BANGLADESHI AND BLACK CARIBBEAN WOMEN

  8.  One of our current investigations Moving On Up? is examining the experiences both of Pakistani and Bangladeshi women who wish to work outside the home, and of Black Caribbean women, who are under-represented at senior and professional levels in the labour market. Our Investigation shows that the younger generation of ethnic minority women are increasingly well qualified, well educated, and want to work. In terms of achievement at GCSE level, ethnic minority girls are catching up or even overtaking ethnic minority and white boys and they are more likely to carry on into higher education. Given that a recent Skills Review for the Government identified a need to increase the proportion of the workforce qualified to NVQ level 4 and above from 27% to 38% by—2020, ethnic minority girls as a group look set to meet this challenge—if we give them the opportunity to get jobs that match their qualifications.

  9.  But despite their higher qualifications in employment and skills ethnic minority women are being held back. Higher qualifications make little difference to the pay gaps suffered by women from all ethnic groups relative to white men—even though they do make a difference to most groups of ethnic minority men. Ethnic minority women are even more concentrated in a narrow range of jobs than women as a whole and they are less likely to be managers or senior officials compared to white women, or to their male counterparts. EOC research shows that young ethnic minority women are three to four times more likely than white women to say they have often taken a job at a lower level than their qualifications, because that is all they could find. And Pakistani and Bangladeshi women are also much less likely to return to work after they have had children.

  10.  Future demographic and labour market changes mean that ethnic minorities will make up an increasing share of the future working population, particularly in key cities. Ethnic minority women are central to Britain's success economically and socially, but if they are to realise their full potential action is needed to open up greater opportunity at critical life points. We hope that this objective will form a key part of the WWC action plan.

MAXIMISING POTENTIAL

  11.  All the recommendations here are welcome. Shaping a Fairer Future rightly gives prominence to the importance of tackling occupational segregation; and we are working with the Women and Equality Unit to help ensure its recommendations are taken forward, building on our earlier investigation.

OCCUPATIONAL SEGREGATION

  12.  We welcome the extent to which the WWC has endorsed the findings and recommendations of our Investigation into Occupational Segregation. We called for a National Strategy on occupational segregation linked to economic and skills strategies to give effect to the objectives of challenging stereotyping and opening up choices and we made specific recommendations for actions to deliver change. Since we last reported on the Investigation to the Committee, we have been working closely with the WES and we are able to report significant progress on key GFI/WWC recommendations.

  13.  At our One Year On Conference recently, Bill Rammell, Minister of State for Lifelong Learning, Further and Higher Education described a range of DfES pilots to challenge segregation including non-traditional tasters for young people making vocational choices at 14, new models of careers advice, information and guidance on wider choices, non-traditional work experience placements, project-based apprenticeships to secure on-site experience for women, adult apprenticeships targeting women in shortage sectors and development of national equality and diversity impact measures for gender segregation on apprenticeships. He also reported the results of the WES survey of apprenticeship pay rates that showed clearly the pay advantages for those working in male-dominated sectors including engineering, construction and ICT. For example, the survey revealed a £40 or 26% per week pay gap between male and female apprentices and that Level 2 early years care and education apprentices earned the lowest rates across all levels and sectors, averaging only £78 per week compared with level 2 construction apprentices at £136 per week. The Minister endorsed the importance of making this information available to young people making choices. The EOC and TUC have called for this survey to be repeated in 12 months time to monitor the impact of the new £80 per week requirement.

  14.  The wide range of supportive speakers at the Investigation One Year On conference—Stella Manzie for the Women and Work Commission, Shirley Cramer, Chair of the E&D Committee at the LSC; John Cridland CBI and Brendan Barber TUC, CITB and Summitskills, young apprentices and employers - sent clear signals that the case for change set by the EOC and WWC is now accepted across government and key stakeholders and that some actions are already underway. We are particularly pleased to be able to report that the new agenda has informed all policy white/green papers since the report of our investigation: Skills Strategy, 14-19 and Youth Matters Green Paper. Here too, we continue to work with the WEU and relevant officials to ensure that WWC and EOC recommendations are implemented. We would like to see the action plan set out clear mechanisms for ensuring that the positive momentum on policy and practice changes continues.

COMBINING WORK AND FAMILY LIFE

  15.  Again, all the recommendations here are welcome. We particularly welcome the proposal for a Quality Part-Time Work Change Initiative, and other proposals aimed at achieving a culture change, so that more senior jobs in the skilled occupations and the professions are more open to part-time and flexible working. This is critical to closing the pay gap. We will be helping to take these recommendations forward, with the Women and Equality Unit, through our current Investigation into the Transformation of Work.

  16.  We are pleased that the WWC report recognises the importance of the recommendation from our investigation into part-time and flexible working, Britain's Hidden Brain Drain, on training managers and supporting small businesses. Training is vital to give managers the right knowledge and skills and help them develop positive attitudes towards managing flexible working. Middle managers are often the "gatekeepers" of work-life balance in an organisation. [17]The inability of some line managers effectively to manage flexible workers, and/or their negative attitudes to flexible working generally, are major barriers to the effective implementation of flexible working policies. [18]In our survey of HR professionals, virtually everyone said managers need to be trained for flexible working to work effectively, but only one in eight said their own organisation provided sufficient training in how to manage flexible working. [19]Small businesses would also benefit from support on costs. We welcome the WWC recommendations on the development of a training package to support flexible working, the examination of fiscal incentives for small firms, additional funding for IiP, and for trade union equality reps and hope to see the focus on mangers sustained in the action plan.

PART-TIME AND FLEXIBLE WORKING NOT JUST FOR WOMEN WITH YOUNG CHILDREN

  17.  It is important that initiatives to open up higher paid part-time work are not just targeted at women, as this may serve to reinforce the perceptions that only women should carry out a caring role and that only women need to work flexibly. Increasingly, women and men are sharing caring roles, thereby making it easier for women to achieve their full economic potential. Access to flexible working is important to men too. Nearly half of the increase in part-time working over the last 20 years has come from men—a million extra male part-timers. [20]In the past two years one in eight fathers of under-six year olds has made a formal request to work flexibly. [21]Increasingly men and women are working part-time at different times in their lives, not just for the more "traditional" reasons linked to parenting and caring responsibilities, but also as students and before and after state pension age. For someone with a disability, flexible working can be the sort of "reasonable adjustment" needed both to support their recruitment or their retention in work. Flexible and part-time working is the future: a pattern of working that most of us will want to access at different times of our lives.

  18.  By 2020, two-fifths of the population will be over 50[22] and our Investigation into Part-time and Flexible Working showed that there may be as many as a million over 50s who would return to work if the conditions were right ie they could work flexibly. [23]More people are going to be working longer and retiring later, while many others will want to work reduced hours before and after the statutory retirement age. More people will have caring responsibilities for older relatives and may choose flexible working to make this possible. Caring, whether for an infant or for an elderly dependant, is no longer the sole preserve of women—19% of men in the 45-64 year old age groupare carers. [24]The Government has recently consulted on extending the right in the Employment Act 2002 to request flexible working beyond mothers and fathers of children under six or disabled children under 18, and we warmly welcome its extension in the Work and Families Act to carers.

EXTENDING THE RIGHT TO REQUEST

  19.  In our Investigation into Part-time and Flexible Working, in our submission to the WWC and in our submission to the Government on the Work and Families Consultation, we argued that the right to request flexible working should be extended to all employees; and the WWC also argues that it should be extended to a wider group of employees. The best practice employers we have consulted have found that it is best to open up opportunities to work flexibly to everyone, not just to parents or carers. Employers have found that so long as flexible working applies only to certain groups, the benefits to the organization are constrained by the inability to manage the issue in the round. The available evidence suggests that experience of the right to ask has also been generally positive for both employers and employees. The DTI's Second Work-Life Balance Study, for example, found a high level of support for work-life balance amongst employers. The majority agreed that everyone should be able to balance their work and home lives in the way they want (65%). Generally speaking, support for the basic principles and concepts of work-life balance was supported by actions—employers that indicated the strongest levels of support tended to provide a wider range of practices and entitlements that helped their employees with their work-life balance. [25]

  20.  Moreover, findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey (WEBS) show that the most commonly available arrangement for flexible working (available in 70% of workplaces) was the ability to reduce working hours and that the majority of workplaces providing reduced working hours did not put any restrictions on who was eligible to use this arrangement.

  21.  Our investigation into part-time and flexible working found that there was a shortage of supply of higher paid part-time opportunities, coupled with 3.6 million part-timers working in a lower level job than they had held in the past. Extending the right to ask to all employees could be a powerful way of achieving change and would increase the number of people who could start to work part-time or flexibly in the same job—ie not having to trade down. Given the Government's plans to extend state retirement age, action to extend the right to ask to all age groups could also be very important.

THE TRANSFORMATION OF WORK

  22.  All of the evidence quoted above confirms that people's expectations of work are changing. Younger people want to explore a number of possible options before they commit to full-time work and both men and women want to be able to take time out of their careers at various points in their lives without damaging their prospects. [26]To accommodate these changing demographics and the increasing demands for flexible working from employers working in a global/24/7 context, radical thinking about the nature of working time is needed so that part-time and flexible working is no longer seen as a deviation from the norm. In our latest Investigation, into the Transformation of Work, we are exploring and developing innovative models and solutions to better match the workplace of the future with the workforce of the future. We are looking at innovations such as opening up flexible working to share between different members of a household—for example, between mothers' working time and fathers' working time, or between adult siblings caring for an older parent. The kind of flexibility offered by, for example, BT, HSBC or McDonalds, empowers people to make decisions for themselves, while enabling companies to retain talent and tap into the skills of all their staff.

  23.  Working together with employers and others, and drawing on the expertise and innovative ideas of the best, we hope to find some new and creative ways of transforming work to create real flexibility and believable choices for individuals and employers. Turning conventional job design on its head enables organisations to bring in the skills that are needed, while enabling workers to make the best use of their talents.

LIFELONG OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN IN TRAINING AND WORK

  24.  We particularly welcome the WWC's recommendations in this area, and we have been working with the WES and LSC to operationalise these. Research for the EOC shows that ESF funded projects, under current funding criteria, are playing a critical role in filling gaps in core provision for women by opening up training and work opportunities beyond level 2, and in non-traditional sectors and with innovative advice and guidance. We see the continuation of this role as a key task for the 2007-13 round of funding, as set out below. This is because the Government Skills Strategy targets public funds on those deemed most in need through lack of basic qualifications and focuses on advice, support and skills training at level 2. This excludes from mainstream training and skills programmes women who take time out or drop out to raise a family. Accessing routeways back into work through advice and guidance, updating old skills or retraining in sectors where women have traditionally been under-represented is a major challenge and, as yet, one unmet through mainstream government programmes. The National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF—see also paragraph 38) for the next round of ESF funding, by taking account of the WWC recommendations, could provide a means of tackling that challenge and we hope to see this picked up in the action plan.

WORKPLACE PRACTICES

  25.  We note and welcome the recommendations in the WWC designed to encourage all employers, including private sector employers, to do more to promote gender equality; but we think there is scope to develop thinking further.

THE PUBLIC SECTORTHE GENDER EQUALITY DUTY

  26.  In April 2007 public authorities will become subject to specific duties to eliminate sex discrimination and promote gender equality. This is an extremely welcome and significant step forward, which we are pleased to see reinforced by the WWC recommendation that public sector employers should be accountable to a Ministerial Committee. It is important that the specific duties should be action focused, and include requirements to collect relevant data and to carry out to impact assessments of new and current policies. The duties will also require public authorities to "consider the need to have objectives that address the causes of any differences between the pay of men and women resulting from their sex" and it is important that these are linked to national objectives by the Government so that co-ordinated action can be taken. For example, action on occupational segregation involves many different public sector players who cannot work in isolation.

  27.  The introduction of these duties will give added weight to the drivers already existing in the public sector—these include Government leadership (eg requiring all government departments to have carried out equal pay reviews); inspection regimes (eg Best Value Indicators in local government); centralized pay negotiations (eg Higher Education); and trade union pressure (eg the Civil Service). The higher degree of union organization within the public sector also makes the threat of legal action a greater risk, and thereby a stronger driver for change, for public than private sector employers. There is already a gap between the incidence of good equalities practice in the public and private sectors, and there is a danger that unless the private sector is subject to an approach similar to that soon to apply in the public sector, this gap may widen still further.

THE PRIVATE SECTOR

  28.  The pay gap between men and women working full-time in the private sector is nearly 10 percentage points bigger than it is for public sector workers. The EOC's latest survey monitoring the incidence of equal pay reviews shows that the least equal pay review activity is in the private sector. While 61 % of large public sector organisations have completed an equal pay review or have their first equal pay review in progress, just 39% have done so in the private sector. [27]Moreover, over half of large private sector organisations reported no past equal pay review activity and were not planning to carry out an equal pay review within the next twelve months; this compares with a third of large public sector organisations.

  29.  Equal pay reviews are a useful means of identifying not only pay discrimination, but also the other causes of the pay gap, including occupational segregation and lack of access to flexible working. Another way of addressing pay discrimination is using public procurement to promote good practice. The EOC therefore supports the recommendations made by the WWC to develop equalities-led procurement advice and use procurement as a means of spreading best practices in diversity and equal pay matters.

  30.  While the wish to be seen as an "employer of choice" is a key driver for change in the private sector, existing accountability mechanisms do not recognise gender equality as a matter to be reported upon, and the voluntary corporate social responsibility mechanisms tend to focus on environmental and community initiatives rather than employment. However, current and future demographics mean that there are considerable business benefits to be gained from closing the pay gap. As things stand at the moment women's economic potential is not being fully realised and both the economy as a whole and individual businesses stand to gain from ensuring that women can reach their full potential. The demographic and productivity case for closing the gender pay gap needs to be more widely promulgated, and we hope that this will form part of the action plan.

THE DISCRIMINATION LAW REVIEW

  31.  We believe that there is a case for modernizing the existing, 30 year old sex discrimination laws to provide more effective regulation for both individuals and employers. In our submission to the Discrimination Law Review (the DLR) we are calling for an examination of the nature of the responsibilities to be placed on institutions and organisations, both private and public. Whilst there will always be a place for individual rights, experience so far suggests that legal action by individual women and men alone cannot redress the inequality that causes the gender pay gap. A more proactive approach, akin to that already being introduced in the public sector, is likely to be more effective in closing the pay gap and achieving changes that will benefit everyone, including employers themselves.

  32.  We are therefore asking the Government to consider that the private and voluntary sectors should adopt a similar pro-active approach to eliminating discrimination, and promoting equality to the new duty for the public sector Far from adding to the regulatory burden, this would simplify and modernize the law and reduce the risk of tribunal cases. Our approach is one of better regulation, not more regulation, and our aim is to extend existing good practice so that it becomes common practice, leading to wider business benefits. Promoting equality is about prevention, rather than cure, and we want to reduce the need to rely on legal cases—there have been a quarter of a million Employment Tribunal cases of sex discrimination and 67,000 related to equal pay in the thirty years since the Sex Discrimination and Equal Pay Acts came into force, with record numbers filed over the last five years. We are also keen that the DLR's examination of the issues should address what support organisations, particularly small employers, may need in closing the gender pay gap.

FUNDING THE WWC RECOMMENDATIONSTHE 2007 CSR

  33.  If the report Shaping a Fairer Future is to make change happen then the amount of funding made available for implementing the recommendations will need to be sufficient to the scale of the task. We suggest that both the 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review (the CSR) and the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) for the next round of ESF funding provide strategic opportunities to target resources on the implementation of the WWC recommendations.

  34.  In laying the groundwork for the 2007 CSR the Government is taking forward a programme of work which includes: an examination of the key long-term trends and challenges that will shape the next decade, including demographic and socio-economic change; and detailed studies of key areas where cross-cutting, innovative policy responses are required to meet these long-term challenges—we consider that Shaping a Fairer Future amounts to just such a study and should be used to determine what further investments and reforms are needed to enable the UK to close the productivity gap.

  35.  In the public sector, closing the gender pay gap and implementing the recommendations in Shaping a Fairer Future need to be embedded in a strategic approach to the implementation of the Equality Act 2006. The Act amends the Sex Discrimination Act to place a duty on all public authorities, including government departments, to promote equality between men and women. We see the implementation of the Gender Equality Duty (the GED) as a priority for the CSR and consider that the action taken by government departments and agencies to fulfill their obligation under the GED should feature ideally in departmental PSAs, or at the very least, the gender PSA.

  36.  It follows that we see the CSR as the vehicle for the WWC's recommendations on public sector pay. The WWC recommended that:

    The public sector pay committee gateway should call all public services to account for how any proposed new pay systems addresses all the causes of the gender pay gap which give rise to costs in the longer term.

  The public sector pay committee was set up to ensure greater centralised control and co-ordination over public sector pay deals—the Chancellor has set a target of keeping pay rises to an average of 2.25%. The pay committee will assess specific proposals for pay increases and changes in pay structures against the government's pay objectives, and recommend to ministers whether they should be approved. It will assess departments' pay and workforce strategies and report to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. The aim is that "all significant pay decisions should be signed off" by the committee. There is an obvious tension between controlling levels of pay and implementing new pay systems that deliver equal pay, which are likely to add costs, hence the need for a strategic approach.

  37.  The WWC also recommended that:

    HM Treasury should ask public sector employers to account for the progress on equal pay during the comprehensive spending review.

  Progress towards the implementation of this recommendation could be tracked through the departmental PSAs.

FUNDING THE WWC RECOMMENDATIONSTHE NSRF

  38.  In the EOC's response to the DTI consultation on the proposed National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) for the next round of ESF funding[28] we pointed out that the work done by the WWC and the recommendations on tackling skills shortages, taking a local approach to the matching of skills and jobs and introducing measures to assist women to return to the labour market, were highly relevant to the objectives of the NSRF. We asked that these should be part of the NSRF framework. We consider that gender equality should be embedded in the NRSF at national, regional and local levels, but we also think that the framework would provide a means for implementing those of the WWC recommendations that relate to delivery at a local level.

CONCLUSION

  39.  The WWC has taken a long hard look at women in the UK economy. Shaping a Fairer Future has found that entrenched occupational segregation both reinforces and perpetuates skills shortages, while a continuing gender pay gap underplays women's contribution to UK productivity. Against this background it is vital that the Government builds upon the momentum generated by the report and acts upon the WWC recommendations. We look forward to playing our part in that and in helping to sustain the necessary action forward into the Commission for Equality and Human Rights, because the important work on the implementation of the WWC recommendations is likely to continue after the integration of the EOC in the CEHR.

  40.  We would be happy to amplify our thoughts in oral evidence to the Committee.






16   Britain's Hidden Brain Drain-Final Report, The EOC's investigation into flexible and part-time and working, EOC 2005. Back

17   2Nelson, A, Nemec, K, Solvik, P and Ramsden, C (2004) The evaluation of the Work-Life Balance Challenge Fund. London: DTI Employment Relations Research Series No 32. Back

18   Nelson ibidBack

19   IFF Research (2005) Flexible working practices. Report prepared for the EOC and People Management. Back

20   Office for National Statistics (2005a) Labour Force Survey Historical Supplement. London: ONS. Back

21   Holt, H and Grainger, H (2005) Results of the second flexible working employee survey. London: DTI Employment Relations Research Series No 39. Back

22   Government Actuary's Department (2004) Population by age last birthday in five-year age bandsBack

23   Loretto, W, Vickerstaff, S and White, P (2005) Older workers and options for flexible work. Manchester: EOC Working Paper Series No 31. Back

24   EOC website. Back

25   Woodland, Simmonds, Thornby, Fitzgerald and McGee, The Second Work-Life Balance Study: Results from the Employer Survey, national Centre for Social Research, DTI Employment Relations Series No 22. Back

26   Williams, L and Jones, A (2005) Changing Demographics. London: The Work Foundation. Back

27   Equal Pay Reviews Survey 2005, Adams, Carter and Schafer, IFF Research, EOC 2005 EOC Submission to the Trade and Industry Committee Inquiry/Women and Work Commission. Back

28   EOC Response to DTI Consultation on the EU Structural Funds Programmes 2007-13. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 9 February 2008