Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Written Evidence


Letter from Anne McIntosh MP

  Thank you for your invitation to submit evidence to the Post Office enquiry. I hope the following remarks may be helpful.

  The Network change consultation is flawed from the outset. There has been insufficient time to consult adequate numbers of those who are affected by the proposals. There has also been insufficient meetings and access to the Royal Mail to explain proposals.

  The proposals will deprive rural areas of vital services. They will hit the most vulnerable the hardest, those living in sparsely populated, isolated villages, notably pensioners, those on benefits and those with young families living in rural communities with poor access to public transport.

  If the changes go through, I would imagine that only 4,500 of those living in the Vale of York will be within three miles of a Post Office, well below the 95% national average figure claimed by the Post Office Group. Given the geographical location and physical position of the Post Offices in the Vale of York with long, windy roads giving poor access, the measurements that are made from each Post Office should be via road access and not a straight line measurement.

  A huge number of my constituents have also written to me outlining their concerns:

    The Linton Post Office serves at least two villages, and the neighbouring Post Office is Tollerton, also proposed for closure, therefore widening the area that will no longer have access.

    Closures will force people to travel to Great Ouseburn, requiring them to cross a river with a toll bridge costing 40p each way. This bridge is also due to close for refurbishment.

    Linton Post Office has increased its volume of business and is profitable.

    Linton Post Office serves over 200 local populations (Linton, Newton, Aldwark) with around 50 businesses and 900 working personnel at RAF Linton On Ouse.

    There is no public transport link with Ouseburn or Grafton Post Offices. There is an infrequent bus service to Skelton but timings do not allow sensible journeys—ie return with 20 minutes or face over a two hour wait. Mothers with young children will have to pay bus fares.

  In addition to the above, there is a 300 metre walk to Skelton Post Office to and from the bus stop, crossing the A19 (there is no pedestrian crossing point, or bus shelter, or seat to rest on or access to toilets).

  The Tollerton Post Office is the hub of the village and serves to get elderly people out their homes and in doing so helps to remove social isolation in this predominately rural area.

  Any post office closure in Tollerton might contribute to forcing more elderly people to move out of the village and thereby further reducing social cohesion.

  There are real concerns over the economic criteria behind the proposed changes to the Post Office Network in rural areas. The plans appear to convert successful economically viable sub-Post Offices into Outreach or earmark them for closure while keeping open those which are not commercially successful.

  This smacks of a hidden agenda and a programme intent on the eventual closure of more post offices on a grand scale destroying the rural Post Office structure in the Vale of York. These changes are simply a body blow to rural communities living in North Yorkshire and must be resisted. I do not feel that there is enough recognition for the special role rural sub-Post Offices play as part of the fabric and social infrastructure of daily life.

9 January 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 30 May 2008