Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Written Evidence


Letter from Patrick McLoughlin MP

  Thank you for your letter regarding the Business and Enterprise Committee's study into the post office consultation. You are indeed correct that this process has caused some concern in my constituency, especially in the village of Kirk Ireton, where the post office is one of those now confirmed to be closed. Not one of the post offices that were proposed for closure in my constituency have been reprieved, despite several passionate and well fought campaigns by local residents.

  Anecdotal evidence from residents suggests that they were never informed that post office monitors were visiting the village, losing out on their opportunity to make their opinions heard. After the decision was announced there were again many complaints that the consultation period was not widely advertised and was too short for many people to write in, especially as the consultation period conflicted with a postal strike.

  One of the strongest and most often repeated complaints is that the consultation process failed to take into account the very poor public transport links to other nearby post offices in the area. For example a neighbouring post office in another village may only be two miles away, but with no bus service it is impossible for elderly or disabled residents to reach it. This was a recurring theme in the many letters I have received arguing against closing this particular post office.

  I hope these views are useful, and I am enclosing a copy of the newsletter (not printed here) I am sending out to residents of Kirk Ireton regarding the closure. I am always available to discuss these issues with you further.

13 December 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 30 May 2008