Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 340-348)

MR HUGH CONWAY, MR JEREMY NICHOLSON AND MR CHRIS TANE

3 JUNE 2008

  Q340  Miss Kirkbride: Do you think it should be the regulator or the Competition Commission?

  Mr Conway: Not the regulator.

  Q341  Miss Kirkbride: He has already failed.

  Mr Conway: Definitely not the regulator; the regulator has already prejudged this by saying he does not want to investigate the industrial market. He is currently investigating the domestic market, and in fact he keeps on saying the market is working but he does not look at our side of it at all. Maybe he should or maybe he should not, that is another issue, but I think whoever investigates it has got to be fully independent.

  Mr Tane: I would say both for my business and for the CIA, our view is not that there is anti-competitive behaviour per se going on; our view is the way that the market is structured is the heart of the problem, so to that extent a competition inquiry of course would throw up some interesting things, it would certainly focus attention on a core issue for us, but in the end I think we believe it is the structure of the market that needs to change not some competition laws that need to change.

  Q342  Miss Kirkbride: When you say the structure of the market, is that about dismantling some of the vertical and horizontal integration that has taken place? If it is that, how else do you do it?

  Mr Tane: For example the structure of the market issue that we have talked about already in terms of the absence of independent players is well worthy of investigation as to exactly why that is. We believe that changes could be made which would encourage new entrants rather than discourage them, and that in itself would be very helpful.

  Q343  Miss Kirkbride: Who would make those changes to ensure that happens, not to just allow it to happen, because at the moment it happens if someone just snaffles them up presumably so that they cannot—

  Mr Tane: I think that is a more technical question than I can answer. My colleagues here can talk about which body should be bringing those changes in.

  Mr Nicholson: We have an independent regulator but nonetheless its judgments are affected by things that happen outside. We have seen this with the announcement of its investigation into the domestic and small business sector earlier on, and doubtless Ofgem will take into consideration not just what this Committee says but what might be coming to them from BERR and other government departments in terms of concern about the operation of the market and security of supply. Going back to the area we mentioned earlier on—access arrangements, transaction costs, these sorts of things—are within the regulator's power where it would not necessarily depend on a Competition Commission referral but those are areas where they could take more action and therefore facilitate more competition.

  Mr Conway: They have to acknowledge and I do not think they have as yet acknowledged that there is an issue within our markets.

  Q344  Chairman: I was very surprised indeed that Ofgem did not look at the wholesale markets as part of their announcement. I do not know what the rationale for that was. This is very frustrating, we are out of time but can I just clarify one thing, in your answer, Mr Tane, on gas storage, did you say the UK now has 19 days' storage or is moving towards that?

  Mr Tane: It will have 19 when the storage that is currently being invested in comes on-stream.

  Q345  Mr Oaten: What is the current number?

  Mr Conway: I think it is 13.

  Q346  Chairman: Thank you for that. Your real plea is not so much necessarily for breaking up the consolidation of the industry but transparency, it is more the openness of the market that you need to make sure that the market works properly? I am just checking.

  Mr Nicholson: That is a big component of it and without the transparent market you are not going to have an efficient one either. That applies both at a European and a UK level.

  Mr Binley: With respect, can I just say this, it is all right you being able to see the figures but you want to be able to act within that market and that is what you cannot do at the moment.

  Q347  Chairman: But in order for the market to function effectively the market needs to be fed with information that they are not getting at present, are they?

  Mr Nicholson: Not enough.

  Q348  Chairman: Thank you very much. There is lots we could ask you. We are very grateful for your excellent written and oral evidence, gentlemen, thank you very much. If any of you feel that you have not had a chance to say something the opportunity exists to give us further written submissions.

  Mr Nicholson: We may well do, especially on prices which have moved a little since our initial submission.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 28 July 2008