Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 760-779)

MR SAM LAIDLAW, MR IAN MARCHANT AND MR RUPERT STEELE

24 JUNE 2008

  Q760  Mr Hoyle: We are getting to where I wanted to be now.

  Mr Laidlaw: It is a different—

  Q761  Mr Hoyle: Hang on, Mr Marchant is answering this, Mr Laidlaw. We will come back to what your disadvantages and advantages are.

  Mr Marchant: In the gas business we do not have the hedge that you would expect to see of better profits out of an upstream business. We are a pure retailer.

  Q762  Mr Hoyle: So you are more exposed?

  Mr Marchant: On gas we are more exposed.

  Mr Laidlaw: On power we are more exposed. We do not have the structural hedge on power. It is a competitive market; we start with different asset positions; some have more cover on power; some have some cover on gas but, as I said before, the percentage cover we have on gas is very small.

  Q763  Mr Hoyle: What were your total profits this year?

  Mr Laidlaw: Last year?

  Q764  Mr Hoyle: Latest recorded profits?

  Mr Laidlaw: Latest recorded profits for the group worldwide after tax were £1.2 billion.

  Q765  Mr Hoyle: 1.2 billion?

  Mr Laidlaw: After tax.

  Q766  Mr Hoyle: After tax, okay. Right. The other argument is that, quite rightly, people believe that the UK is becoming a gas lender of last resort to Europe. I wonder outside European liberalisation what can Ofgem do—and we talk about Ofgem as the "toothless tiger"—to reduce the wholesale price volatility? Is it possible or is it not?

  Mr Marchant: It is very difficult for anyone within the UK environment, regulator or company, to influence effectively what is a global market. I do not think it is fair to characterise the UK as a gas lender of last resort. We will have to import around 20% of our gas requirements this year from somewhere. In the summer we tend to be marginal exporters and in the winter we tend to be heavier importers. The reality is the way the UK plays. It is where the global market volatility tends to play out most because we have effectively three sources of gas: we have Continental Shelf gas, we have Norwegian gas and we have LNG. It is one of the very few markets where these three sources can play out a gas price which then tends to echo around the world and then back. Coming back to the very specific question about what Ofgem can do apart from focus on Europe, which is absolutely fundamental, I think there is one thing they could do which is about making sure that it is easy for gas storage facilities to be built. I am thinking particularly about access arrangements to the gas grids where the regime is very, very complicated and it is based upon an auctioning regime. I think that they could help gas storage facilities be built in the UK. Gas storage is naturally a dampener on volatility wherever it is built.

  Q767  Mr Hoyle: Last year—and tell me if I have got it wrong—the figure we got was that it went as low as 13 pence per therm and then went right up to 60 pence per therm as we got near winter as demand went up. The argument we keep having and you keep claiming about what investment you have put in, about LNG facilities, wonderful, marvellous, but that is about getting gas in so you can sell it, but why is it you are not investing on the part that will keep the prices down and take the volatility out (and that is what the Germans concentrated on) which is storage? That is where you are failing the customers.

  Mr Marchant: We are investing.

  Q768  Mr Hoyle: How many days can you store for?

  Mr Marchant: You asked whether we were investing. We are investing in Aldbrough which is the biggest storage facility being constructed in the UK at the moment—

  Q769  Mr Hoyle: At the moment.

  Mr Marchant: —So we are investing.

  Q770  Mr Hoyle: Okay, you are investing at the moment but it has taken you years to come to it. How many days of storage after this wonderful investment has taken place will you have?

  Mr Marchant: You can define storage in a number of different ways.

  Q771  Mr Hoyle: However you want to define it.

  Mr Marchant: If you take average UK demand versus storage we have currently got 18 days in the UK. That will go up by another 31 when all the facilities we expect to get built—

  Q772  Mr Hoyle: What timescale is that?

  Mr Marchant: That is within the next five years

  Q773  Mr Hoyle: After all that wonderful investment do you not still think you are failing your customers when we talk about France at 122 days or Germany at 90 days? We are exporting cheap gas in summer; they store it for the winter; and what we do is buy at the spike and rip our customers off.

  Mr Marchant: Absolutely that is not the case. I believe that the UK has had the most flexible gas market—

  Q774  Mr Hoyle: Had?

  Mr Marchant: That is on the decline. However, we will still have flexible fields producing for many years. The market has responded by delivering new gas storage facilities as fast as both regulation and physics allow. It takes some time to develop gas storage facilities, up to five years, because basically creating salt cabins takes time to dissolve things.

  Q775  Mr Hoyle: Absolutely no argument with you—it takes time, but you have had time. Why is it that France has got 122 days, Germany has got 90 days—

  Mr Marchant: They did not have the North Sea.

  Q776  Mr Hoyle: It did not have the North Sea, so therefore we should have been in a better position to see what was happening.

  Mr Laidlaw: If I may come in here just to build on Mr Marchant's point. In looking at number of days' storage and making those comparisons we have just been making, the flexibility that currently exists in the North Sea fields has been excluded. What has historically happened is that a number of fields have been operated at low production in the summer and high production in the winter. That is not included in that storage definition. That has historically provided the cushion. As those fields are decommissioned and dismantled in the next few years then there will be clearly an increasing need for storage. Like Scottish and Southern, Centrica is very much involved in moving forward new storage projects. One of our big challenges has been the planning applications for those projects; and we are delighted to see the progress that the Government is making on the planning bill. I think that is very important if we are actually going to get new storage facilities built.

  Q777  Mr Hoyle: Okay, so we can match Germany in France in, what, eight years?

  Mr Marchant: I am not sure that is the right thing to do. We could significantly overbuild storage if we mandate it. You need to get the right level of storage. Storage is not a cheap option. It costs significant sums of capital to develop these things. The fact is, you need a flexible gas system which would have a range of different storage facilities and a range of different import facilities, and a range of different contractual support for it.

  Q778  Chairman: We will have a chance to revisit this issue with the next set of witnesses. There is a concern about inadequate gas storage, and there is a concern about the adequacy of the forward gas market. That is what we take from this session?

  Mr Marchant: The thing which causes me most concern is the inability to contract long-term for gas molecules, whether I am going to put them in the storage in the summer and bring them out in the winter, or float them throughout the year. Up to three or four years is fine—beyond that the market is very, very illiquid.

  Q779  Mr Weir: Moving on to the liquidity of the electricity market, we have heard a lot from the smaller suppliers who say there is a lack of liquidity within the market and that dulls the price signal for investors. What are your comments on that? Do you agree there is a lack of liquidity in the electricity market?

  Mr Laidlaw: Our experience would be that there is less liquidity than there is in the gas market but, nevertheless, for up to two years out there is reasonable liquidity. It is not obvious to me that actually a process of releases and mandated sales would help here, because we would be in the situation of selling out but having to buy back; and buying back might actually increase the cost to our customers.

  Mr Marchant: We have tried to get some data on the volume of trading in the electricity market versus annual demand, and we think it trades around between four and eight times—there are different data sources. Four times the UK's annual demand is trade—whereas gas it is ten to 15. Clearly the gas market is more liquid; there is more trading going on; but it is still four to eight. For our own company, to give you a flavour, last year we generated around 45 terawatt hours but we traded over 200. You can see we are active in the market, balancing our position and trading our position in short, medium and long-term markets. The other thing is, you say: is there a barrier to new entry in generation; of the four gas projects that started last year, two of them have non-Big 6 participants. One, Caron Energy is being done completely by a new entrant; and Marchwood is a project we are involved in where 50% is owned by ESB the Irish utility. New entrant is still happening in generation.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 28 July 2008