Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140-144)

CBI

1 APRIL 2008

  Q140  Chairman: Are there any more comments that you want to make on the structure of what it should be like? How would you like the government to structure this forum?

  Mr Campkin: Pauline might have some thoughts but in general terms I think the key thing is that any structure takes effective input from the business community and provides a way for the business community to continue to highlight the difficulties that exist, and indeed find ways of delivering effective results. As you know from our previous evidence, we are not greatly supportive of talk shops.

  Ms Shearman: To add I think it rather depends on the level of business that the UK has with Turkey. Clearly it will not be warranted, I do not think, necessarily by the current volume but if we are looking towards the future to increase that share quite considerably then that is a possibility.

  Q141  Chairman: I will ask the question I was going to ask first. I got the impression while we were in Turkey talking to business people that there is a huge reservoir of goodwill towards the UK and UK businesses, which is not shown in every market. I think the political situation, the UK is perceived as a good political friend to Turkey as well as a potential economic trading partner. So do you share my instinctive view that actually there are some very real opportunities for the UK which might even have a comparative advantage with other economies?

  Ms Shearman: Definitely and I think quite a number of senior Turks in companies and even in government have been educated either in the UK or in the US and who are very favourable towards the UK. But I think any dialogue that exists has to reflect the volume of business that is actually being done in both directions.

  Q142  Chairman: I think that is a valid comment. It is a way of asking my last question in a sense because it sums up all the evidence so far, unless there is anything else you want to say. If this government-to-government forum is established because there is a judgment that it is worth doing, what are the top three issues it should address?

  Mr Campkin: At the risk of being somewhat repetitive—

  Q143  Chairman: Repetition is always good—you make your point by repeating.

  Mr Campkin: Certainly at the top of the list is the legal enforcement of existing obligations, I have no doubt at all about that. Secondly would be to look at ways of enhancing the reform process which takes forward the process of creating a better economic circumstance in Turkey from which British companies can benefit. Pauline, do you have a third one?

  Q144  Chairman: You do not have to have three, two is fine. Is there anything else you feel that we have not talked about in this evidence session and that you would have liked to comment on?

  Ms Shearman: Clearly I met with the Turkish-British Business Council yesterday from whom you will be hearing next, but I think one of the key areas—and this fits into the idea of whether there should be a government-to-government forum—is that we have to ensure, first of all, that if we are going to do that we get commitment from government and that ministers will be available to do it, and that company people at senior level are committed enough to take part in it because Turkey is a country where status is very much observed, and the protocol, and it would be very difficult if we were to undertake to start this arrangement and then find that we cannot actually get the level of support that we require.

  Chairman: Thank you very much. You have promised us one or two things which we have made a note of and our staff will be in touch about to make sure it works. I am very grateful for your evidence. Can I also apologise publicly to our next witnesses. I am afraid that competing Committee business means that I have to go elsewhere to do some other business but Mr Lindsay Hoyle will take the chair for the Turkish-British Council and I will look with interest at the transcripts. I am very sorry; there is no discourtesy intended but sometimes you cannot be in two places at the same time. Thank you very much indeed to the CBI.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 30 June 2008