Select Committee on Business and Enterprise Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Northern Pensioners Association—Crewe & District

POST OFFICE CLOSURE PROGRAM THIRD REPORT OF SESSION 2007-08

  Having read the above report and also watched much of the proceedings of the Committee recently on TV we have the following comments.

1.  CONSULTATION PROCESS

  The report confirms our initial view that the consultation was a sham. We do not share the view of the Minister for Postal Affairs that he had done enough by informing local councils and MPs that the real question was not whether a post office should close but whether the right branches are being closed. Responsibility for the consultation lies with the Post Office and Postwatch.

  The Post Office had ample opportunity in their correspondence with me to make this clear. PostWatch had two letters published in our local papers urging the public to participate but to the best of my recollection did not make the question clear. That is a fundamental flaw in any consultation/opinion poll. It also makes consultation pointless when, as in the case of Nantwich, all sub-post offices were to be close.

2.  POST OFFICE BUSINESS PLAN

  The report does not mention the business model adopted by the Post Office for the supply of postal services in the future yet this has a significant bearing on the Consultation Process. The model is based on the existence of large High Street based urban post offices not peripheral sub-post offices. Therefore any proposal to close such a post office and keep sub-post offices open will be rejected out of hand.

3.  WORKING NEIGHBOURHOODS SCHEME

  This scheme comes under Caroline Flint, Housing Minister.

  The following was reported in The Guardian 5 February 2008:

    "Changes to the way jobcentres operate are also central to her plans as part of the Government's working neighbourhood schemes.

    `Rather than the jobless going miles to get employment, debt and childcare advice, it is better to bring that advice to them'."

  There seems to be a contradiction between policy on job centres and post offices.

  We feel the criticism contained in the report of the process are far too mild and bland to reflect the depth of feeling in the community.

28 February 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 2 June 2008