Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Second Report


1  Introduction


1. The single theme that underlies this report and informs everything we want to say about the performance of the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG) is: Delivery. We have commented previously on the challenges that face CLG because of how it is constructed and its unusual reliance for the achievement of the goals Government has set it on a plethora of other Departments, agencies, non-departmental bodies, local authorities and other stakeholders. Most of the money for which CLG is responsible is spent for it by someone else—by 450-plus local authorities in England, by 47 local fire brigades, by large government agencies such as the soon-to-exist Homes and Communities Agency with its £2.2 billion budget, and by many more bodies besides. All the 10 Public Service Agreement (PSA) targets CLG was required to meet in 2006-07 were set for a different Department and inherited when it was formed in May 2006, and almost all of them relied on the actions of someone else if their goals were to be achieved and on data collected elsewhere if they were to be accurately measured and assessed. To a greater degree than perhaps any other Government Department, CLG depends on others to deliver what it promises. The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government herself, four months into her new job, displayed a commendably clear-sighted understanding of the nature and uniqueness of her new Department when she told us:

the Department is one that does not have the traditional levers in many cases of regulation and funding and direct delivery … Our Department is very much about influence, about brokering, about negotiation, and that is a very different skill set in many ways from a traditional government delivery department.[1]

The central thread running through all that follows, therefore, is the question of how well CLG enables, enthuses and encourages its many partners to deliver on its promises and how well it is setting clear visions that those other bodies can translate accurately, cost-effectively and efficiently into practical achievement. In short, the central question animating our Report is how CLG delivers.


1   Q 119, Ev 16 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 3 January 2008