Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum by the Confederation of British Industry

  1.  The CBI is pleased to respond to the Committee's request for evidence on community cohesion and the impact of migration. In our response we have focussed on employment issues, where the CBI has a unique insight. Issues such as the impact on public services and on regional policies are clearly also important—but are better addressed by relevant experts.

  2.  CBI members were broadly supportive of the Commission on Integration and Cohesion's report "Our Shared Future". Employers are already addressing many of the key issues raised in the report, but it is important to recognise that a one-size-fits-all solution for all employers is not appropriate. An additional period of leave, for instance, would have limited benefits, and come at a high price for firms, especially SMEs. The CBI has taken an approach of good practice dissemination among employers as the best way to foster workplace policies that are beneficial to integration, but which businesses can adapt to their own unique situation. The CBI has already worked with DIUS and the TUC in the production of a good practice guide on English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL), and we are currently working with the TUC to produce a Diversity Guide for employers.

  3.  In this response we focus on three key areas:

    —  employment is a key tool for integration;

    —  migration policy should balance integration with the needs of the economy; and

    —  employers are helping to promote integration by addressing English language skills and equality in the workplace.

EMPLOYMENT IS A KEY TOOL FOR INTEGRATION

  4.  The workplace is a key area in which the integration of migrants into UK society take place. It provides both a platform to develop language skills informally and formally—one of the most fundamental drivers of integration—and an environment where migrant and non-migrant workers meet, ensuring interaction in diverse groups, reducing the potential for a divided community.

  5.  Evidence from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) suggests that, for many migrant groups, high levels of employment are already a reality. For example, the largest group of migrants in the last decade—by country of birth—are from Poland; they have an employment rate of 85%, compared to 78% from the UK-born population. The CBI believes that a high level of employment amongst migrant groups provides three key benefits: firstly, it helps migrant workers to integrate into society through their workplace interactions; secondly, it counters the perception that migrant groups have moved to the UK to take advantage of the welfare system; and thirdly, it means that migrant workers are making a contribution to the Exchequer.

  6.  Over time, the power of employment as a force for integration can be seen in the career development and increased earnings of migrants as they adapt to life in the UK and succeed with their careers. Many migrants initially take easier-to-find, lower-skilled roles—perhaps in order to improve their English. Over time these workers integrate and take jobs that more fully utilise their skills and growing comfort in UK society.[25]

MIGRATION POLICY SHOULD BALANCE INTEGRATION WITH THE NEEDS OF THE ECONOMY

  7.  Employers in the UK have had a greater need of migrant workers over the past few years; 60 quarters of continuous growth have created some capacity constraints in the economy—at both high and low skill levels. Access to migrant labour, which can help to address these shortages, has been a key part of the flexible labour market strategy that allows the UK to compete in the global economy.

  8.  Employers recognise, however, that the integration of these migrant groups into society is also vital, and that this means that inward flows need to be managed. The CBI is supportive of the principle of the free movement of workers, but we have supported the Government's temporary restrictions on migrants from Bulgaria and Romania, for instance, as it was clear that a longer "pause for breath" after 2004 was needed. For the same reason we understand the current suspension of Tier 3 (unskilled workers) of the new Points Based System.

  9.  The UK's record on workplace integration is good, but this should not prevent us from ensuring that we properly protect those migrants who might be vulnerable to not having their employment rights respected. This should take the form of targeted education and enforcement—not further new law. Information is now being made available in the newer EU states in the language of migrant workers to explain employment rights before workers enter the UK; for example this guidance spells out the level of the National Minimum Wage (NMW) and the maximum that can be deducted for accommodation. The measures in the current Employment Bill on improving enforcement of Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate and the NMW will also help.

  10.  In order that the balance of economic need and integration can be maintained, more must be done to improve the quality of the data we have for migration. While large improvements have been made in the quality of the available data—starting from a very low base—more needs to be done to build the public's trust, and develop a sound base for policy making. The development of the E-borders scheme is a very important in step in this direction, but is not forecast to be "live" until 2013. We agreed, therefore, with the proposal in "Our Shared Future" that ONS should "reinvigorate their work on co-ordinating migration statistics at a national level".

  11.  For the UK-born workforce, we must work to ensure that no-one feels "left behind" by the labour market; migration can provide a short term solution by filling shortages, but in the longer term the sustainable solution for business and society is to improve employment and skills levels in all parts of society—in particular, by addressing the issue of economic inactivity. The Freud report laid out a coherent, integrated strategy to address this through delivery of targeted support, which the CBI agreed with. The CBI has been supportive of the Government's policies—such as Train to Gain and the Skills Pledge—to increase skills levels as part of this process, but employability is also about attitude—employers want people who want to work and targeted support should deliver this.

EMPLOYERS ARE HELPING TO PROMOTE INTEGRATION BY ADDRESSING ENGLISH LANGUAGE SKILLS AND EQUALITY IN THE WORK PLACE

  12.  English language is a vital driver of social integration as well as labour market integration. While many migrant workers from the EU accession states arrive with excellent English language skills, many migrants need to work on their English language skills when they arrive. Employers are playing their part on language training and are also committed to promoting community integration. Many firms provide English for their staff—over a quarter (28%) provide English language training to their employees and/or signpost them to relevant courses in the local area. It is also encouraging that one in six (16%) employers is now also providing practical information about life in the UK to help ease the process of integration.

  13.  The Department for Innovation Universities and Skills has been working to develop a new English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) for Work qualification. This is a new bite-sized, work-relevant programme which will be of benefit to employers and their employees—the CBI has welcomed this. The CBI and TUC have produced, with DIUS support, a good practice guide for employers on ESOL. This highlights the benefits of investing in English language skills to employees, as the examples below demonstrate. It also provides clear information and guidance to employers in how best to respond to language challenges—and where to access the government support that is available. This support must be available in a clear and concise language, setting forth the aims of the scheme and funding arrangements, from a clearly recognisable, easy-to-access source. This will be particularly important for smaller firms who do not use migrant workers on a regular basis.

  14.  There is a wealth of robust evidence showing that equal opportunities helps businesses draw upon the one resource that in today's knowledge economy gives sustainable competitive advantage—the skills, understanding and experience of people. Discrimination in employment, where ever it exists, squanders effort, ideas and ultimately, business sales. It leads to wasted potential, wasted labour and wasted revenues; the business case underlines the moral imperative. In June 2008, the CBI will publish—with the TUC—a report on equality and diversity in the workplace. This report will include case studies demonstrating employers' activities in promoting equality and diversity at work, and top tips for employers to help them develop their equality policies.

EXAMPLES OF EMPLOYER SUPPORT FOR INTEGRATION

Cavaghan & Gray

  Cavaghan & Gray are seafood manufacturers with 1,000 staff based in the North West, who have developed a comprehensive strategy to support migrant workers. The firm offers ESOL courses for employees before or after shifts for 2.5 hours a week for nine weeks. New workers are assigned a buddy for the first few weeks to ease their integration into the UK and the company. Their buddy speaks their language and supports them through the health and safety training. As a further support for new migrant workers, all signage and paperwork, including the company handbook, is multilingual and the structured induction is currently held in a range of languages. The company has also set up a Diversity Forum expressly to monitor the integration of migrant workers, and to identify any future needs they may have. Employees from every nationality and community are encouraged to contribute to the firm's quarterly magazine as a way of promoting cohesion. Staff morale and community cohesion within the firm have improved substantially as a result.

First Group, Bus Division and English language training

  First Group is the largest surface passenger transport company in the UK with a turnover of £3 billin. The Bus Division's European Recruitment Programme has recruited over 1,100 employees from Europe. For three months prior to employment, applicants receive free English language training based on everyday language, relevant for the workplace and linked with health and safety. Applicants are only recruited once they are considered to be able to communicate in English. Once in the UK, employees are encouraged to continue their ESOL training, usually in their own time, but through a local provider or with the support of a Union Learning Representative in an onsite lifelong learning centre. First Group, Bus Division also helps arrange bank accounts for new employees and supports them in their search for rented accommodation in the first sixth months after moving to the UK. Such an approach has delivered real bottom line benefits—reducing staff turnover and increasing profitability.







25   Dora Iakova "The Macroeconomic Effects of Migration from the New European Union Member States to the United Kingdom" March 2007. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 16 July 2008