Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the East Midlands Regional Assembly

  The East Midlands Regional Assembly is the regional chamber for the East Midlands. It consists of 111 members drawn from elected representatives of the regions local authorities, together with business, social and environmental partners. The Assembly is responsible for scrutiny of the Regional Development Agency and is the Housing Planning and Transport body for the region. The Assembly is also responsible for coordination and integration of regional strategies.

  The East Midlands Regional Assembly, in its role as regional planning body has been reviewing the Regional Spatial Strategy. As part of this review a range of studies were completed to aid the policy making process. Studies of the carbon footprint and trajectories to 2026 indicated clearly a need to respond rapidly to the reduction of the carbon emissions of all new development. (The draft Regional Plan and supporting research is available on http://www.emra.gov.uk/what-we-do/housing-planning-transport/rss-review/documents ).

  Carbon neutral new development is essential to ensure that there is no overall increase in the East Midlands carbon footprint. To this end the Draft RSS included policies for carbon neutral new development. The East Midlands Regional Assembly, as the regional planning body recognised that delivering carbon neutrality is a challenge and sees opportunities for bringing action on current housing stock into the planning process.

  Policies in the Draft Plan have been drafted to be fit for purpose over the plan period. The choice of carbon neutrality as a target for new development mirrors the recent signposting from government policy, particularly with the Code for Sustainable Homes. The Assembly recognises that the challenge of delivering carbon neutral homes is significant and Policy 38 of the Draft Plan is designed to allow local authorities to develop appropriate policies for their own location and development market, recognising the diversity of the regional property market and the range of different development that might occur across the region over the Plan period.

  Whilst this approach offers flexibility to planners and developers, it would be helpful to highlight possible approaches that might be appropriate for more detailed local policy. The ideal development is one that is designed to reduce the demand for energy from the building, then use energy efficient appliances throughout the development and supply all remaining energy needs from renewable energy sources on or close to the site, reflecting the energy hierarchy that underpins Policy 38. This development, would then be a true zero carbon development. However, this ideal would currently pose a significant burden on developers and it is not clear that the capacity in skills and supply chains is yet in place to enable it to be delivered. Developers should still seek to deliver significant carbon savings through increasing thermal efficiency and some level of on site renewables on all developments, but the following options are offered as ways that carbon neutrality could be delivered:

  Developments that cannot deliver 100% renewables on site practically or without excessive cost could meet carbon neutrality by:

    —  The developer could invest in offsite renewable generation at a capacity that covers the expected energy usage of the development over a specified life time. This approach offers the developer a practical way to offset on site emissions by equivalent generation and may be a cost effective business approach to carbon neutrality. This approach may be particularly useful for mixed usages sites, as industrial scale units may provide a better basis for economic renewable energy supply.

    —  Local authorities may wish to negotiate a contribution from developers for the estimated carbon emissions from the site and use the contribution for improving the thermal efficiency of existing housing stock within the local authority area. This approach may be particularly useful for local authorities with large stocks of housing with poor thermal performance, giving a resource to dramatically reduce emissions from existing stock. The local authority could also use the contribution to install renewable energy at local schools and community facilities, offering cost effective carbon reductions, community benefits and awareness raising opportunities.

    —  Developers may wish to develop some sites with renewable energy generation that has more capacity than required by that site. For example by installing a biomass generation plant close to one site and using the excess generation capacity to offset the emissions from another site within the same planning area.

    —  Developers may wish to enter into agreements with registered social landlords to offset emissions from their private developments, through improvements to social housing stock.

    —  Ensuring that all homes are signed up to a recognised green tariff. This approach is comparatively easy for a developer to achieve, but has the disadvantage that the occupants of the houses can change to a normal tariff at any point after occupancy.

    —  In general offsetting through tree planting should be the lowest of all options and should not be used to offset the full balance of carbon emissions from a site. Where tree planting is offered the trees planted should be native British trees to support biodiversity gains.

  The targets in the Draft Plan include significant micro-generation quantities to reflect the importance that on site renewables are likely to play in the next few years. The research completed to support policy development indicates clearly that a mixture of large and small scale renewables as well as energy efficiency are essential for delivery of the 20% by 2020 targets. However, larger scale technologies are generally more efficient and cost effective at delivering carbon emission reductions and future policies and drivers could significantly alter the uptake of micro-generation positively or negatively. The policies also recognise the role of fossil fuels and other technologies. LDFs could include policies for the development of both targeted amounts of onsite renewables and emissions reductions from the above suggested flexible solutions, with carbon reductions being delivered within the planning authority area to aid monitoring. The Regional Assembly will promote these flexible approaches to local planning authorities.

  The East Midlands Regional Assembly feels that a number of these options provide opportunities for coordinated action on current housing and could be targeted specifically at hard to treat homes, that currently fall outside the government funding regimes. The large scale treatment of existing homes by developers also offers economies of scale and engages those best placed to deliver the works. Economic benefits of new business and supply chains are also likely.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 2 April 2008