Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


First Supplementary Memorandum by CityWest Homes

SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    —  The ALMO model has worked very effectively in Westminster and this submission highlights the opportunities for further development of the model. A high performing ALMO like CityWest Homes is able to focus on service delivery and bring about innovations and improvements which frees the Council's Housing Department to focus on strategic issues.

    —  CityWest Homes (CWH) has a key role in supporting community cohesion and neighbourhood renewal, particularly through its inclusive processes of resident involvement in decision-making and Its growing influence on the use of commercial properties within the HRA. Building on this track record of community engagement and its close links with the local authority CWH is capable of making a greater contribution towards increasing the supply of rented housing and improving the management of rented housing.

    —  Longer-term stability and greater financial freedoms are needed if successful "round one" ALMOs are to thrive and continue to contribute towards the achievement of Government priorities. For CWH there is now an urgent need to plan and deliver beyond "Decent Homes". There is a risk that the momentum behind innovative, customer focused service delivery could be lost and some opportunities for future development stifled.

    —  CityWest Homes completed the Decent Homes programme in December 2008 and is well placed and ready to embark on an ambitious longer-term asset management programme but is constrained by annual changes to the HRA and the 5-year agreements. Ideally an asset strategy should have a 10-30 year time frame in order to secure and allocate funding and to

manage residents' expectations. If given the remit CWH could also embark on building new homes in Westminster, keeping resident involvement at the heart of the process.

    —  Three-star ALMOs can help to rationalise the management of rented accommodation within the private and public sector but are impeded by the requirement to charge VAT on housing management services.

    —  A revised ALMO model should therefore include the ability to:

      —  Provide a housing management services for other landlords without having to charge VAT;

      —  Use full rental income to provide services;

      —  Bid directly for Housing Corporation funding and borrow outside HRA constraints in order to attract private finance; and

      —  Build new social and intermediate housing.

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  CityWest Homes (CWH) is a "round one" Arms Length Management Organisation (ALMO) and has managed Westminster City Council's housing stock since April 2002. It was one of the first ALMOs in the country to gain excellent status from the Audit Commission and was, again awarded 3 stars with excellent prospects for improvement in September 2006. In December 2006 CWH was one of the first housing management organisations to sign up to the Respect Standard for Housing Management. The board structure combines challenge, support and accountability and includes residents, independent housing experts and council nominations.

  1.2  We are pleased to have been invited to provide a second written submission to the inquiry, the first being a joint submission with Westminster City Council which covered a broad range of issues in the terms of reference and included the Report of the Westminster Housing Commission. This submission complements the first by illustrating the experience of an inner city Arms Length Management Organisation (ALMO) with a focus on social housing management as set out in the terms of reference: " ...

    —  The future role for local authorities as builders and managers of social housing

    —  The effectiveness of different social housing models including traditional local authority housing, ALMOs, housing co-operatives and housing association..."

2.  THE FUTURE ROLE FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES AS BUILDERS AND MANAGERS OF SOCIAL HOUSING

  2.1  As a manager of social housing CityWest Homes is proud of its achievements, especially meeting the Decent Homes standard in December 2006 and retaining 3-stars status. Through this process CWH attracted and developed the following: expertise in complex building programmes; excellent systems for resident involvement and housing management services; in-depth local knowledge; detailed understanding of the assets it manages; and a vision for sustaining excellent services beyond Decent Homes. CWH would like to continue to develop a long-term programme of service improvement that includes entering management agreements with other landlords but needs more certainty about the future of ALMOs (see 3.1 0-3.12)

  2.2  Although demand for affordable housing in Westminster will always outweigh supply,there is scope to reverse the decline in the supply of new social housing in Westminster. CityWest Homes, working alongside the City Council, has the potential to embark on a building programme that could make significant progress with tackling the housing shortage, and make more progress with reducing overcrowding and creating sustainable inner city communities. There are substantial development opportunities on HRA land within Westminster where density is low and where there are pockets of un"2

used and under-used buildings (eg garages, storage sheds and some commercial properties).

  2.3  Higher density housing bulit to excellent design standards is a valid option in parts of Westminster and would enhance the architectural and environmental quality of targeted neighbourhoods. This in turn creates opportunities to reduce overcrowding by developing family accommodation at other sites. For example, one of the best estates in Westminster has very high density and excellent design.

2.4  The extremely high land values could be utilised to attract investment in a greater range of housing products including social rents, intermediate (targeting families) and private housing.

  2.5  Building new homes in existing communities requires sustained resident engagement at all stages of the process. CWH is best placed for this role because of its strong track record of resident involvement and the skills it has attracted back into the organisation to deliver the complex building programmes associated with Decent Homes. The organisation already manages the majority of homes on HRA land and is primed for action having just completed the Decent Homes programme.

  2.6  This is therefore, an ideal time for CWH to go beyond the Decent Homes Standard to meet other stock maintenance requirements and if allowed, to build new homes. Sustaining this investment and undertaking a programme of continuous improvement beyond five years, will require a longer time frame for planning, additional funding, freedoms and flexibility (see below).

3.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL HOUSING MODELS INCLUDING TRADITIONAL LOCAL AUTHORITY HOUSING, ALMO., HOUSING CO-OPERATIVES AND HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS

  3.1  The ALMO model as applied in Westminster shows how adaptive and successful the model can be. Few housing management organisations can match the complexities of the CityWest Homes portfolio which bring opportunities as well as challenges. CWH manages 21,500 properties with a mixture of tenures.

    —  12,300 are for council tenants (including sheltered and supported);

    —  9,200(42%) are leasehold properties

        —  RSLs hold the learn for 411 properties

        —  a quarter of all leasehold properties (2,362) are sublet, of which 629 are to RSLs

        —  over 1000 of all sublets are for temporary accommodation for the homeless

        —  over half of leaseholders are not ex-Council tenants;

    —  Nearly 90% of the stock is flats, a third or the homes are in conservation areas and 13% are in listed buildings and 15% are street properties;

    —  CWH supports 14 Tenant Management Organisations which manage 2,827 properties (13% of stock).

  3.2  Added to the variety of tenure and stock is the rich diversity of residents in CWH villages and their surrounding communities. Nearly half the resident population is from Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) communities and 182 languages are spoken in the city. Two wards are among the 10% most deprived in the country and pockets of need exist throughout the city, closely correlated to the location of council estates. Nearly 12% of households in Council housing are overcrowded, due mainly to a shortage of larger accommodation. Westminster's unemployment rate is above the English average.

  3.3  CityWest Homes carefully manages the inherent tensions arising from such a mix of clients and by providing a variety of opportunities for residents to communicate with us and participate in decision-making. CityWest also takes a broader view of the local community. Unlike RSLs the local authority boundaries set for CWH has allowed it develop in-depth knowledge of local communities, an overview of the city and effective partnerships with other service providers. For example during the immediate aftermath of the bombings on 7 July 05, CityWest Homes worked closely with partners in a community reassurance programme and as a result there were no significant increase in reports of harassment.

  3.4  CWH prides itself on its commitment to involving residents in service improvement and exemplifies the assertion that ALMOS are the most effective in the social housing sector at resident involvement. Our recent survey conducted by MORI shows that across the board 70% of tenants are satisfied with the overall service. CWH has very high service standards and has Local Service Improvement Compacts which are tailor made for estates. These unique compacts involve residents in setting service priorities and monitoring performance.

  3.5  Much of the Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy and other overarching strategies are targeted where CWH manages homes and CWH is actively involved in local partnerships across the city through its resident involvement, community safety and community development teams. Through c!ose work with the police, health, education and training providers and because of its local knowledge CWH helps to connect local residents and service providers. CityWest Homes was a founding partner in a local charity, "Vital Regeneration" which specialises in IT learning and development projects for people who are not in paid employment. There is scope for future partnership with the private sector through the vehicle of corporate social responsibility.

  3.6  With its influence over the commercial HRA properties and close links with local communities and partners CWH can further promote community cohesion and sustainability. Land use can be geared to meet local social and economic needs eg supporting community enterprises, attracting services for the community, and where appropriate homes could be created on redundant "commercial" sites.

  3.7  As stated above CWH has become proficient at implementing complex maintenance programmes and completed the Decent Homes Programme in December 2006, four years before the 2010 deadline. During this time over 6,000 homes were improved to the DH standard. Considerable efficiencies were gained through partnering arrangements with constructors (one of the first for pubic sector housing) and with careful management of the supply chain which includes residents in scoping projects. CWH also became a leading member of a consortium of 11 London ALMOS which combine procurement processes—this ha potential benefits worth in excess of £30 million for the network. This was all possible because the ALMO has a clear focus on service delivery and can concentrate on getting the details right and take forward innovations. These capabilities can be transferred into a new role of building homes. In turn, an excellent ALMO allows the Council to focus on the strategic agenda. In this regard the model works very.

  3.8  With its presence spread across the city CWH is ready and able to take a leading role in stock rationalisation and/or management agreements where there are multiple landlords. The mix of landlords in CWH villages can result in different service standards being applied in the same community. There are over fifty RSLs that own or manage properties In Westminster, none of which have a 3-star rating from the Audit Commission and only one has signed up to the Respect Standard. Within the HRA residential property portfolio, over 1,000 properties are either leased or sub-let by RSLs. In addition over 1000 properties including some privately based ones, are used by the temporary accommodation scheme for homeless families. Some of the most vulnerable people in our local communities are getting a one or two star service when they could be better served, as their neighbours are, by a truly local and excellent housing management organisation.

  3.9  The administration costs and complexity associated with many layers of management could be reduced if CWH could provide housing management services on behaif of other landlords. This would not result in a monopoly of ownership and management—the social housing s6ctor would remain diverse with a more consistent service within local communities. A significant barrier to progress is the requirement to charge VAT which should be removed or set at a lower rate.

  3.10  For successful "first round" ALMOs there is an urgent need to plan beyond "Decent Homes" and sustain high quality services in the longer term. There is a real danger that the momentum behind innovative, customer focused service delivery could be lost and opportunities for future development stifled. Managing resident expectations and optimising asset management cannot be achieved in the current subsidy regime which changes annually. For areas like Westminster the trend is for less subsidy despite the high labour costs and the additional costs of operating in conservation areas. New forms of investment should be permitted.

  3.11  A ten- to thirty-year planning cycle is needed for major repairs and maintenance and thirty years is required for planning and programming new developments. For example CWH is particularly concerned about the effects on leaseholders of service charges for major works. Greater financial stability would allow CWH to plan major maintenance and improvements with greater care and certainty and to set up mechanisms like a "sinking fund" to help leaseholders plan well ahead for what can be very high one-off service charges (eg £50,000). (Opportunities for building new social and intermediate homes are mentioned above in section 2.)

  3.12  High performing ALMOs should have the ability to move out of the HRA subsidy system and have the ability to use the full rental income to provide services; with this move should come the ability to borrow or bring in investment set against future income streams.

4.  CONCLUSION

  4.1  In a short period of time CWH has developed a proven capacity for excellent asset management, resident involvement and community development in a complex environment of mixed tenure and diversity. Against this proven ability to perform to excellent standards and to be accountable to local communities the ALMO model should be considered for freedoms and flexibilities that will improve the supply and management of social housing in inner city areas.

  4.2  Working alongside the local authority, a successful ALMO like CityWest Homes should be able to use its skills base to build new homes, to plan ahead for ten to thirty years and make more of a contribution to stock rationalisation and management agreements with other landlords. Timing is important: CWH needs to manage residents' expectations of future services and there is a risk of losing some of the momentum and capacity built up during the Decent Homes programme. The main barriers seem to be financial: freedom to borrow outside the HRA system; use full rental income to provide services; the right to bid directly to the Housing Corporation; and to offer management services without having to charge VAT.

19 January 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 May 2008