Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


First Supplementary memorandum by the Department for Communities and Local Government

  During the evidence session on the 12th December, I offered to write providing examples where my Directorate has intervened where it appeared that local housing authorities were refusing to accept or deferring a homelessness application when in fact the applicant might have been entitled to be accepted as homeless or been at least offered comprehensive options to avoid homelessness.

  I made clear to the Chair that I did not wish to name or shame different councils but did offer to provide concrete examples of where poor practice has been brought to the Directorates attention and where officials and specialist advisors (seconded to my Directorate) have intervened/visited to ensure good practice was being adhered to. Examples of this are attached at annex A.

  The Directorate also provides support and advice to all Councils as well as specific action where problems have been identified. The activity which officials/specialist advisors carry out to advise Councils on the best way to prevent homelessness includes:

    —  Homelessness Roadshows—These are regional events where the Directorate's specialist advisor/officials highlight all areas of good practice that Councils should be adopting. All local authorities are invited to attend, usually resulting in over 90% take up. We have undertaken 25 of these events in the past two years covering every region. Councils are informed about how to analyse their own performance with a view to improving it and advice on how to get more out of their RSL partners, to enable them to tackle homelessness more effectively.

    —  Good practice toolkit—This is a comprehensive homelessness prevention toolkit in the shape of a checklist for the local authority to compare their performance against the good practice options listed.

    —  Regional Champions—Over the past two years we have appointed local authorities to act as critical friends to other authorities and advise and support them with their homelessness agenda. This is carried out by way of an action planning day or a peer review over 3 days. Regional champions have been selected because of their track record on homelessness. There are currently 14.

    —  Mystery shopping—Specialist advisors will randomly ring local authorities from a member of the public's perspective to ascertain whether or not good practice is being adhered to.

    —  One to one diagnostics—Specialist homelessness prevention advice to individual Councils (including all front line staff) over 1 or 2 days, depending on size—We have visited over 200 in the past two yearn.

  The Homelessness Minister, Yvette Cooper also wrote to all local authorities last June outlining the need for them to adopt good practice when tackling and preventing homelessness but also making clear that they must ensure that they fulfil their statutory obligations in parallel with their prevention work.

  Although we have done our very best to ensure that all local authorities adhere to the best possible practice, there of course have been Instances where this has not been the case. However, investigation by my officials has found that this has been mainly due to poor judgement on a individuals' behalf rather than the Council openly flouting the rules.

  I hope this clarifies the work of my Directorate to continue to support local authorities' performance in tackling and preventing homelessness.

Terrie Alafat

Director, Housing Strategy and Support

12 January 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 May 2008