Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Second supplementary memorandum by the Department for Communities and Local Government

HOUSEBUILDING ON SURPLUS PUBLIC SECTOR LAND

  When I appeared before the committee on 12 December I was asked to write to you with further background to the Chancellor's PBR announcement of the ambition to see 130,000 homes built on surplus public sector land over the decade to 2016.

  The 130,000 homes target in the Chancellor's PBR statement (which replaced a previous target of 100,000 homes announced in the 2006 Budget) is based on an analysis of potential new homes on surplus public sector sites where development is in train and of further sites identified as having residential development potential using data from the Register of Surplus Public Sector Land (The Register) and the most recent compiled National Land Use Database of Previously Developed Land (NLUD-PDL).

  The Register, established and managed by English Partnerships, lists sites owned by central government departments and agencies which are surplus to operational requirements. Government departments and their sponsored bodies are required under Government Accounting to add sites identified as surplus to the Register and allow 40 working days to test other public interest before these sites can go on the open market. The Register includes both brownfield and greenfield land. From an analysis of the Register of those sites which are identified as having potential for residential development, we estimate that there is the potential to deliver up to 25,000 new homes on this land (approximately 14% of the total site area on the Register).

  In contrast NLUD-PDL covers solely brownfield sites and holds information about previously developed, vacant and derelict land and buildings. It includes local authority land and land in other public ownership as well as privately owned land. NLUD-PDL statistics are compiled on the basis of annual voluntary returns from local authorities. English Partnerships administers the data collection of NLUD-PDL. Based on the NLUD-PDL 2005 return, we believe about 34,000 further homes could be built on public sector land, over and above that included on the Register.

  The majority of these estimated 59,000 new homes which can be delivered over the next ten years will be on brownfield land already declared surplus to requirements and identified as such on the Register and NLUD-PDL return. The South East and South West offer the greatest potential for housing development. Where English Partnerships is taking forward sites it will consider carefully the development potential of all the sites to assess their suitability for housing and other development. As part of this process English Partnerships will carry out consultations with local community groups, local planning authorities and other interested bodies about the types of development being considered. Any proposals for new housing development will require planning permission and need to meet the requirements of the development plan process.

  The balance of the 130,000 figure—some 71,000 homes—comprises new homes as part of committed developments on surplus land owned by major public sector landowners, for example the Defence Estates Project MoDel, and sites already acquired by English Partnerships. These sites include the Hospital Sites Portfolio of 96 sites acquired in April 2005 from the Department of Health, and Oakington, a former Defence Estates site.

  You asked whether the 130,000 figure related exclusively to brownfleld sites. It will be clear from what I have said that it relates to both brownfield and greenfield land, although we would expect the great majority of the homes to be on brownfield land.

  You also mentioned at the end of the session that you might ask me for an update of the number of Registered Social Landlord Social HomeBuy sales and applications near the end of the inquiry, which I understand is likely to be in about two to three months time. I would of course be happy to provide this information on request.

Andrew Wells

15 January 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 May 2008