Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 560 - 564)

THURSDAY 19 APRIL 2007

YVETTE COOPER MP, MS TERRIE ALAFAT AND MR PETER RUBACK

  Q560  Emily Thornberry: Do you think that overcrowding is set to continue to increase? Is the Department going to set targets for trying to keep the lid on overcrowding and are you going to redefine it?

  Yvette Cooper: Overcrowding outside London has not changed very much; overcrowding in London has increased. I do think that the current statutory standard is hopelessly out of date. We have already consulted on some options around changing it. What does not help is simply changing the definition. What we need to be able to do is to link the definition with allocation policies or approaches to do something about it with the need to build more family housing. What we do not want to do is just deal with the definition in isolation because that would create additional and more confusing pressure for local authorities who need to do it as part of a wider strategy to address the issue.

  Q561  Chair: Minister, can I just pick you up on the regional aspect because you appeared to be suggesting that you thought overcrowding was more of a problem in London than elsewhere, but all of us will know from our own constituencies the angst caused by overcrowding in the social sector in particular and the way in which the allocations policy often does not seem to deal with that issue at all. I think it goes back to a question that Clive was asking. What advice is the Department going to be giving on allocations policy to try and deal with overcrowding given the effect that it has on people's health, for example?

  Yvette Cooper: What we have been looking at, and we have not come to final conclusions on this, is what options there might be for changing the overcrowding standard but doing so in a way that would need to be taken into account in local authority allocations and how you might be able to do that over time. In other words, local authorities would have to take greater account of overcrowding than they currently do. If they do that, I was trying to use the example before of a way in which you might be able to deal with it by an intelligent policy that looks at moving more people through the stock and you could end up helping the same number of families and also tackling overcrowding at the same time, but in other cases there will be trade-offs, so it is important that you look at this as part of the strategy around temporary accommodation and homelessness and do not just look at overcrowding in isolation. We are looking at changing guidance for local authorities and better guidance for local authorities to be able to address this.

  Q562  Chair: One of the issues that was raised with us, and a number of us will recognise it anyway, is that some councils use the overcrowding rule so rigidly that they will not move a family which is severely overcrowded into a property in which it is moderately overcrowded: they wait until they can give them a property where they are not overcrowded. Is your review covering those issues as well?

  Yvette Cooper: Yes. Terrie, I do not know if you want to add something around overcrowding?

  Ms Alafat: Just a point of clarification. The reasonable preference category, if you set out a national basis for local allocation policies, does include overcrowding but one of the issues is the outdated standard which the Minister has already mentioned. One of the things we have done quite recently is we have given some funding to five London boroughs as it happens, because there is a lot of push that is coming from London boroughs—

  Mr Olner: Your door is too close to them!

  Q563  Emily Thornberry: Too overcrowded, Bill!

  Ms Alafat: The interesting thing about the funding we have given them is what they are trying to do is look at the approach they have taken to homelessness and extend it to overcrowding because for some of these overcrowded households there are things you can do now to alleviate their circumstances even if they are waiting for a larger property. We were quite taken by that approach because that was something John Hills also suggested, that the approach on homelessness seems to be working and should we not be looking at other groups. It is an interesting test case and it is not very large yet but I think it will feed into what the Minister has been saying about taking a more strategic approach to this issue.

  Q564  Chair: Can I thank you very much, Minister. As you see, we regard housing as an incredibly important subject, hence the time we have given to it today and we are grateful to you for giving your time to it today. Thank you.

  Yvette Cooper: Thank you very much.






 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 21 May 2008