Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 116-119)

MR ROBERT UPTON AND MS SUE PERCY

12 MAY 2008

  Q116 Chair: Good afternoon and welcome. The Committee has already heard significant evidence about the need to replace the missing generation of planners but also to upgrade the skills of the planners that we already have. Can we start off with you briefly explaining what the RTPI is doing to try to meet the gap in availability of skills, to meet the sustainable communities agenda and the other parts of the Government's planning agenda?

  Mr Upton: I think there are two element to this, firstly the shortage of professional planners in general and secondly the actual shortage of skills. When it comes to the shortage of planners we have undertaken some quite significant educational initiatives over the last seven years or so which has increased the throughput, particularly of postgraduate planners. Some very able people are coming through the planning schools now. We have also revised our routes into membership so that, for example, through the new class of associate membership it is possible for more people to be drawn mid-career into planning and to be developed that way. In terms of the actual shortage of skills, we ourselves offer a very wide range of training on both the commercial basis and also low cost events. We have our own programmes like Planning Matters which provide online support to planners. I think it is important here to take the long view. The development of skills absolutely rests on a bedrock of education. The skills which planners require will change many times during their working careers and that is a function not just of new legislation and new policy but changing circumstances and changing requirements. What good planners critically need is a very solid educational foundation. If they have the solid education and they understand the "why" then they will be able to develop new approaches to the "what" and the "how" over the years. For us that is a very major part of our mission.

  Q117  Chair: Who are you addressing? Which institutions are you addressing when you are trying to ensure that that bedrock of education is provided?

  Mr Upton: We have a direct relationship with planning schools and universities in this country and indeed elsewhere and we set the basic educational philosophy which they are required to respond to.

  Q118  Chair: They are required?

  Mr Upton: If they want accreditation that is.

  Q119  Chair: So the lever that you have is that you provide the accreditation.

  Mr Upton: That is right and that is quite valuable. We have been very successful and very much assisted by the bursaries which the CLG gives to postgraduate students. One thing which we think for a very small amount of money in relative terms could be done which would improve the situation would be if the Government were to make a similar amount of money available to support final year undergraduate students, in particular those who are progressing to what we call a professional masters. There is a critical shortage and it is still quite hard in current circumstances to make sure that all courses are full of good people. We think that a small amount of money would go a very long way there.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 24 July 2008