Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum by the Older and Wiser Merton Seniors' Forum

  Public Toilet provision should be seen as a basic Human Right. Provision of public toilet facilities is vital for community harmony and cohesion, essential for comfort, hygiene and a sense of wellbeing to all. However, to older people, lack of, or poor access to toilet facilities can lead to difficulties in venturing out. This reduces personal freedom and dignity. To many, social exclusion becomes a reality.

  Toilet provision is not just essential in town centres but also in recreational areas such as parks, open spaces and allotments. The use of such areas is of course vital to the wider health agenda.

  Local authorities should have ring fenced financial resources from Central Government to provide public toilets, particularly in main town centres and tourist areas. Provision by the local authority would give a sense of ownership and responsibility to the community and the upkeep of these facilities a matter of pride and concern. Public toilet provision should be obligatory in any town centre regeneration, park re-planning and major bus, rail or underground redevelopment. Adequate toilet provision encourages people into town centres and to tourist attractions. People use business and services within those areas, perhaps a small levy paid by businesses to local authorities could be investigated as they are the beneficiaries of this increased trade.

  Sponsored toilet provision (as with roundabouts) as a means of advertising could be discussed with local businesses.

  "Spend a penny" has become part of our language, the majority of people would be willing to pay 20p-50p for the use of a clean, well maintained toilet, if provided by the local authority.

  Dialogue with local community, residents groups would perhaps be the best way of deciding opening hours. Town centre provision would need longer opening hours than in parks etc.

  Public toilets should be accessible to all, wheelchairs, walking frames and push chairs must be accommodated.

  Disabled toilets should be made available to a much wider range of people.

  Information on Radar keys should be readily available in GP surgeries, hospitals, pharmacies, libraries, local authorities and voluntary organisations.

  In the short term, Local Authority Environmental Departments should map all toilet provision, this to be available to all but particularly in the first instance to those entitled to a Radar key.

  Security of public toilets should be multi faceted. Main town centre toilets should perhaps be staffed with evidence that police and community support officers are on ready call. There could be limited use of CCTV. Use of extremely sturdy equipment (refer to Continental toilet provision) should be used. Use of new technologies and CCTV could be of value in un-staffed facilities. Fully automated toilets, mush used in other countries could provide provision more readily than purpose built toilet blocks.

  There needs to be investment into research and development of vandal proof/longlife/user friendly/affordable/toilet provision. This would encourage commercial interest.

  Society has moved on considerably and is used to unisex provision in a number of services, (eg hairdressers) and more so in the leisure industry (mixed changing rooms). This should be encouraged in toilet provision, shared provision is the accepted form in the home. This would serve to alleviate queuing experienced by women, the need of men to use other than a urinal, this could also have a "softening" effect and reduce both the perception and reality of toilets being used for both drug and sex offences. However, the use of the French idea of "pissoirs" as an added service should not be discounted.

  All businesses including banks and building societies should be encouraged to offer toilet provision. Adequate toilet provision would encourage people into town centres and this must increase business opportunities and profits. Toilet provision should be available as "goodwill" and without need of purchase. However, small businesses may need to levy a small charge for toilet upkeep and cleanliness.

  This should be seen as a major Partnership issue between local government and local business. A local award system (best loo) highlighted in the local press, local government, media etc could add to prestige and profitability of local businesses. There has to be pressure on local businesses to recognize that they have responsibilities to the community from whom they get their custom. It should be an accepted part of any planning permission given by local government to commercial enterprises that have visiting customers. Building contractors, road maintenance contractors and transport providers should be obliged to provide adequate portable toilets to their staff.

  Areas that are of general tourist interest or host occasional tourist attractions eg sporting events, flower shows, see large numbers of extra people. These visitors generate extra trade adding greatly to the local economy. This bonus to local business should be recognised and some of this regenerated into the community for both toilet provision and the general enhancement of the area. Large numbers of extra people in an area should not be to the detriment of the health and environment of the host community. Promoters of "Events" should be obliged to provide portable toilets in an area around the venue, particularly along the routes to transport points. Local inhabitants should not suffer detrimental effects to their environment. Tourism is a major economic factor in this country, those who gain financially, including transport providers should be obliged to add to the facilities that are of vital importance to the general ambience and health of the country.

  Public toilet provision should certainly be the long lasting legacy to London from the 2012 Olympics.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 22 October 2008