1. Summary
This submission
outlines issues arising from Richmond Council's groundbreaking Community Toilet
Scheme. It highlights some of the wider issues regarding 'traditional' and
Council owned toilet provision in the borough and recommends that the committee
consider how government can provide financial assistance for Councils wishing
to refurbish their remaining toilets. It also draws attention to the ongoing
financial implications for the Council arising from interest shown by other
local authorities.
2. Introduction
The
provision of toilets has an impact on social inclusion as well as public health
and hygiene implications. It is one of
the key concerns of many residents and yet there is no statutory requirement
for local authorities to provide toilets and no Best Value Performance
Indicator (BVPI) for toilet provision.
Richmond
Council has been leading the way on partnership based toilet provision through
its innovative and acclaimed Community Toilet Scheme. The scheme enables the
Council to work in partnership with local businesses to provide access for the
public to more clean safe toilets over most of the day. Further information is documented within the
Department for Communities and Local
Government's published Strategic Guide: Improving Public Access to Better
Quality Toilets.
3. Background
Over the
past two decades, along with many other Local Authorities, Richmond has closed
many of its public toilets, because of
the huge cost in investment required to bring the facilities to a
reasonable standard and issues related to dwindling use and inappropriate
behaviour. The backlog of repairs and refurbishment reflected financial
pressures over many years leading to lower priority for and under investment in
a non-statutory service. Partly perhaps as a consequence of poor condition,
many of these facilities showed a low level of use.
In the late
1990s, Richmond Council introduced a new partnership approach to the provision
of public toilets, inviting two local pubs to receive an annual income from the
local authority, in return for offering their facilities free of charge to
members of the public. The Community Toilet Scheme was launched in 2004,
building on this experiment and adding 12 further members. In 2005 it was
decided to re-launch and undertake a major expansion. Following a subsequent
review, signage has been improved. The number of facilities in the scheme now
stands at 67 with several more being signed up
at present.
4. Sharing
Best Practice
Local Authority interest in the Community Toilet Scheme has steadily been
gaining momentum. Richmond Council has hosted several visits from other
authorities along with a best practice seminar on toilet provision in July
2007. We have submitted information for
the Greater London Authority's 2006 report into toilet provision and made a
presentation at their public hearing in January 2006. More recently we made a
presentation at the British Toilet Association AGM in November 2007.
This Council has shared information for use within the Department for
Communities and Local Government March 2008 Strategic Guide: Improving Public
Access to Better Quality Toilets. The Council will be working with ENCAMs to
produce a toolkit about the Community Toilet Scheme for other local
authorities. It is anticipated that requests for further information and visits
to Richmond may increase in number as a result of this toolkit. Since late 2007
interest has grown significantly with almost 100 Local Authorities contacting
Richmond Council to find out more about this innovative scheme. Meeting this level of interest has become
difficult to sustain and is making a significant drain on scarce staff
resources.
5. Provision
of Public Toilets
This year
Richmond Council will review its own public toilets including those situated in
civic buildings, parks, libraries and cemeteries. There are significant costs
associated with the refurbishment of the 5 remaining traditional "highways"
public toilets as well as ongoing inappropriate behaviour issues and dwindling
use. There are resource implications in regard to the public use of toilets at
other Council owned buildings, including the provision of ongoing cleaning and
maintenance. In addition, the Council will need to give due weight to
reluctance of staff at some locations to support public access to toilets that
are perceived as for use by staff only.
6. Community
Toilet Scheme: Resource Implications
The
introduction of the Community Toilet Scheme has enabled Richmond to provide
access to far more toilets and at more locations across the borough than it
could have provided through traditional and council owned properties alone.
These include areas of relative deprivation and are open longer hours than
'traditional' public toilets.
Whilst the
cost of providing Automatic Public Conveniences around the borough proved to be
too high in terms of cost to use ratio and the cost of renovating and continued
running of traditional public toilets is high, the cost of the Community Toilet
Scheme is comparatively low. However, in addition to the set up costs of the
scheme there still remain ongoing costs for the provision of this type of
toilet. This includes, annual payments to scheme members, signage costs,
publicity costs as well as ongoing staff resource costs implications in terms
of inspection and monitoring of the premises and administrative and partnership
based resources required.
7. Recommendations for
consideration by the Select Committee
The ability
to charge the public for use of toilets provided by Councils is welcomed but it
is hoped that government will recognise the need for further financial support
for local authority toilet provision.
We would ask that the committee consider the need for further government
backed financial support for local authorities wishing to refurbish their
existing public toilets and for ongoing associated maintenance, security and
cleaning costs.
It is also
hoped that the committee will recognise that the significant interest in
Richmond Council's Community Toilet Scheme has serious financial implications
for this Council and will recommend the provision of financial backing to
enable Richmond and other exemplar authorities to provide advice to other local
authorities.