Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Bath & North East Somerset Council

COMMENTS UPON THE DCMS PERFORMANCE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE PROMOTION OF TOURISM

  Please find the comments for the Parliamentary Culture Media and Sport Select Committee upon the DCMS performance related to Tourism from the viewpoint of this Council.

  Bath and North East Somerset welcomes the opportunity to comment.

OUR STARTING POINT

  Bath and North East Somerset's Tourism offering is dominated by the City of Bath.

    —  One of three World Heritage sites in the South West

    —  One of 28 World Heritage sites in the UK.

  The World Heritage designation recognises Bath as a place of outstanding universal value for its architecture, town-planning, landscape, archaeological remains and its role as a setting for social history. The history of the City extends over six millennia, from its earliest days when the Hot Springs were a place of worship for early communities, to the modern day when Bath is an international icon of architecture and archaeology within a thriving local community. The United Nations Educational Scientific & Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) identified "the exceptional value of the historic and monumental ensemble of Bath" and committed the City to a management plan that has been revisited over time.

  The World Heritage Site Management Plan (and the "Future for Bath" vision) set out a commitment to improve the interpretation of the city's history and to more actively engage local people and visitors in understanding the value and relevance of Bath's World Heritage Site status in an enjoyable and educational way.

THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

  The outstanding built environment of Bath reflects its location. Set at the southern extreme of the Cotswold Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (an AONB that wraps around the eastern boundary of the City) and lying just to the east of the Mendip AONB—a designation that includes large swathes of the area governed by Bath & North East Somerset Council.

  This co-location of outstanding natural landscape and the energies of man—expressed through the building of an historic city—ensure Bath is a special place that is in need of special attention.

THE CITY AS A TOURIST DESTINATION

  The City is once again striving to evolve through a range of regeneration programmes—including the "Southgate" retail & housing development and the "Bath Western Riverside" development—whilst protecting and enhancing the historic centre,that is the heart of the City's designation by UNESCO.

  In the 18th century the city's grand parades, its squares and circus and its gardens formed one of the finest examples of urban design in Europe. These streets and public open spaces formed a stage for culture and pleasure, assembly and wellbeing and were copied by many other cities across the world.

  However, today, Bath's public realm is cluttered, badly eroded and in desperate need of reinvestment. The Council is developing a bold and exciting strategy for public realm and movement within the city centre which seeks to make Bath a more legible and walkable City and to reclaim its streets and spaces for public life, particularly cultural and community events and activities.

  This approach can not just be resourced from private sector development alone. Support from the strategic bodies within the public sector is essential in order to protect and enhance this World Heritage Site and to attract further partnership funding.

  From within its own resources, the Heritage Services division of the Council is already engaged in a re-investment programme to protect, enhance and reinterpret the Roman Baths and Temple site, a religious spa as unique to Roman Britain as the City of Bath is today. The Baths and Pump Rooms are a central feature of the City and provide the focus for this programme, which will accelerate over the next few years.

  However the Service is also considering the feasibility of providing a transparent cover over the monument, in the position and form of the Roman barrel vault roof—to provide a 21st century facility reminiscent in impact of the Great Court of the British Museum and I.M. Pei's glass pyramid at the Louvre. Once realised this project—juxtaposing the ancient and modern—would reflect the desire of regions and governments to present their heritage in a more ambitious and dramatic fashion.

  The Department of Culture Media & Sport (given the support of its non departmental agencies) should be in a position to exert influence upon other Government Departments—particularly with the "Department of Communities and Local Government" and "HM Treasury" based upon expert knowledge and understanding of the issues that major tourism centres and World Heritage sites have to address.

  The level of Rate Support Grant is an example and can be used to represent the particular problems represented by 4.2 million visitors to the City of Bath (2005 Economic Impact Survey South West Tourism), a City that has a resident population of 85,000. This scale of visitor numbers impacts upon the revenue costs to the Council—particularly those costs that enable the Bath and North East Somerset Council to present the City—

    —  its parks and open spaces

    —  the City Centre

    —  the International Cultural Programmes

    —  the public buildings

in a way that reflects properly the World Heritage Status to international and national visitors.

  Given the shortfall in funds the Council is unable to approach the scale of investment required to enhance and display the only UK World Heritage City in a more dramatic fashion—so that it can continue to attract visitors to the UK & South West of England, in a competitive International and National Market.

RATE SUPPORT GRANT

  The nature of the present difficulties can be related to the current government funding system as it limits this Council's ability to fund the costs associated with a World Heritage City in the following ways:

  The revenue grant support system does not accurately reflect the cost of maintaining the infrastructure of a World Heritage City and the cost of providing services associated with the number of visitors attracted to the area.

  This situation is highlighted in the current DCLG consultation on changes to the formula grant distribution system from 2008-09 related to visitor numbers. The proposed change replaces the day visitor indicator with a population-weighted indicator linked to the attractiveness to an area of day visitors.

  The weighted indicator proposed does not take into account the popularity of unique attractions such as the Roman Baths Museum as this is given the same attractiveness rating as any other museum in the country.

  The proposed change is also based on the assumption that only the population living within 50 miles of the area are likely to be day visitors to that area, again this is contrary to the experience in Bath & North East Somerset where in Bath alone there are more than four million day visitors per annum (excluding regional shoppers) against a total of only 1.6 million people who live within 60 minutes drive of the city (our closest proxy for the 50 mile zone).

  The proposed change, if implemented, actually makes the position worse for Bath & North East Somerset, with an estimated loss of grant of around £300k.

  In addition to the grant formula system not allocating sufficient grant based on the cost drivers of a World Heritage City, this Council received £2.7 million less grant in 2007-08 (£3.3 million less in 2006-07) than the government calculates we need, due to the grant damping mechanism where councils earning grant above the government-set floor level have increases scaled back to pay for those councils that would otherwise receive a increase in grant below the level of the floor.

  To put this into context, B&NES is the third lowest funded unitary authority per head of population (net budget requirement excluding Dedicated Schools Grant);

  The Council is unable to fund additional resources to support the costs associated with a World Heritage City through its other main funding stream of council tax due to the Council Tax capping regime imposed by the government, where the Council has to limit increases to under 5% per annum.

  These factors combined with the future outlook of a reduction in the levels of government funding for public services (set to be announced in the Comprehensive Spending Review 2007) and increasing statutory service resource requirements (eg cost of care of the Elderly and Children) leaves the Council with little or no resource to maintain a World Heritage city."

  Whilst this Council is aware that the DCMS is undertaking some work through Price Waterhouse to examine the issues of World Heritage sites the special circumstances of a City, and its surrounding hinterland, tasked with protecting, improving and presenting the World Heritage City are not to be examined.

  This Council's contention is that this City represents a complex economic model worthy of detailed investigation and special treatment through the Rate Support Grant. There is already a wealth of evidence to support this contention in the negative comments of visitors to the City.

TRANSPORT FUNDING

  In 2006-07 a statutory free off peak concessionary fares scheme was introduced for eligible bus passengers (those over 60 and disabled). Regrettably, the government grant available for concessionary fare authorities was distributed in a manner which favoured areas of high deprivation rather than areas where demand for public transport was high, such as in Bath&NES. Consequently the annual additional costs to the Council of running the scheme is more than £600k above the available budget following the distribution of grant.

  From 2008-09 a national concessionary fares scheme will be introduced allowing all eligible bus passengers free off peak travel on bus journeys originating in Bath&NES. As a popular tourist destination it is anticipated that there will be a significant increase in the number of concessionary fares that will need to be reimbursed to bus operators. The DCLG is currently consulting on three options for distributing the additional £200 million available in England for implementing the scheme amongst concessionary fare authorities. Two of these options reflect the particular attractiveness of Bath&NES to visitors, whilst the third is more closely related to urban density and deprivation factors as a proxy for existing bus usage. The third option, if adopted, is likely to lead to a further increase in the budget needed to fund the concessionary fares scheme. The Council will be making representations to the DCLG to take full account of the number visitors to the area in the distribution of the grant.

RECENT ISSUES

  The recently opened "Thermae Bath Spa" is a modern structure that merges into a group of historic buildings to create an iconic venue that attracts a local, national and international clientele. The support of the Millennium Commission Lottery Fund enabled this innovative partnership between the public sector and a commercial partner to be developed.

  The Spa complements the Theatre Royal and the "Recreation Ground" as extraordinary facilities at the very centre of the City.

  Even so there is a myriad of other buildings that need significant investment, major decoration and renewal programmes in order to display their rare grandeur to the visitor to the City (the Guildhall is a good example)—and to those wishing to relocate their businesses to Bath and North East Somerset.

  Given that the Georgian Buildings form part of the World Heritage Designation we are concerned that there has been little support for this aspect of the Cities offering.

  In influencing & guiding the investment of government, lottery and other sources of regional funds, Bath and North East Somerset would expect the DCMS to understand the scale of investment required to maintain & restore these buildings & the infra structure of public spaces.

  That the implications are taken into account in both policy & resource planning and communicated to other Government Departments—otherwise the nation is in danger of demeaning the Tourism and Heritage value of this World Heritage Destination.

FESTIVALS AND VENUES

  Bath enjoys an International Music Festival, an International Literature Festival, an International Guitar Festival and the country's only dedicated Mozart Festival—a programme of 18 discrete events that in other parts of the UK would be considered as National Treasures (such as the Eisteddfod).

  These events have an impact upon the Cultural Offering, an impact that is felt throughout the year—not just during the period of the Festivals. They attract tourists directly—to the events—but also provide a flavour of the International Dimension of the City

  For the most part the venues are small sites. They include the Bath Abbey, the Assembly Rooms, the Forum and the Pavilion. The Abbey is an incredible expression of Church Architecture however the Forum (a redeveloped cinema) and the Pavilion (a hall) cannot aspire to the acoustic, visual, energy use and access qualities of a modern, purpose-built, venue.

  The Council is examining the possibility of developing a "signature library" within the Southgate Development that will reflect a growing ambition for the celebration of literature, poetry also the fostering of creative thought and debate. Work is also in hand to explore the feasibility of a "History Centre", bringing together the riches of the Council's Record Office and Libraries Local Studies Collection, (possibly in partnership with the records from other organisations in Bath), to provide a one-stop-shop in which the collective memory of the community can be explored and enjoyed in a state-of-the-art facility.

  Whilst the Library will provide another small performance space recent studies—by ABL Cultural Consultants—have identified the need for a medium size concert and conference venue which could yet be included in the Bath Western Riverside Development. They also felt there was justification for a new iconic building housing an Exhibition Gallery to display major touring exhibitions from the UK and abroad, in rotation with the City's own collections.

  Given the present financial constraints there is little chance of these ambitions being realised. As a result more of the conferencing and exhibition trade will be drawn away to other venues, such as Bristol, further demeaning the economic base of Bath and North East Somerset.

  The work presently being undertaken by DCMS into the economic value of World Heritage sites to tourism within the UK could be extended to examine the issues of economic sustainability of this City as the effect of policies of other Government Departments take effect.

  DCMS seems to lack knowledge, passion and influence to be able to affect the delivery of other Departments' policies.

MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES

  Bath and North East Somerset has an unrivalled array of museums that contribute to the Tourism offer.

  Seventeen institutions are currently Registered or Accredited with the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA). Two of the Council's museums, the Roman Baths Museum and the Fashion Museum (formerly the Museum of Costume) are designated by MLA as non-national museums of national or international pre-eminence, while the Council's Victoria Art Gallery, the museum most visited by local residents, offers an exhibition programme of regional significance.

  Some of the district's museums, such as the Museum of Bath & Work, tell aspect's of local history while others, such as Radstock Museum and Saltford Brassmill, record our rich industrial heritage. Others, such as the Holburne Museum and Museum of East Asian Art, exhibit artistic collections of the highest quality and use them as the focus for events and educational activities.

  Despite these riches there remains a pressing need for new thinking and fresh investment. The Council has already identified the need to relocate the Fashion Museum to a new location where its outstanding collection can be exhibited and used to maximum effect. There is also an ongoing public debate about the need for a City Museum for Bath and for a World Heritage Centre and work is in hand to identify the feasibility of achieving both objectives in a single exciting new attraction.

  However, we believe the impact of removing charges for the major London collections has affected the tourist's willingness to pay for these attractions in Bath. Visitor numbers have dropped since the major museums removed their charges and we believe the perceived "value for money" represented by the Cities "tourism offer" to visitors has reduced as a consequence.

  We believe this has had a detrimental effect upon the gross visitor numbers although we find it difficult to quantify this effect.

  It is apparent that the impact and effect of policy changes within DCMS's own Departmental responsibilities was not thought through so that the impact upon other tourist locations (outside of London), was identified and compensated for.

HIGHER EDUCATION & EXCELLENCE

  Bath enjoys the proximity of two universities. Each reflects different aspects of the Cultural Offering but together with the City provide a force in preparation, training & performance that is expressed upon a World Stage.

  Bath Spa University provides acclaimed courses in Art and Design and Music that fit closely alongside the Bath Festivals programmes—providing both facilities and contributions that support an enviable international reputation.

  The University of Bath is renowned for its engineering and management schools. In addition, in recent years, it has played an increasing role in International Sport—particularly as part of the "English Institute for Sport" providing a training venue for athletes with a UK and World Wide reputation.

  The University hosting the England Rugby Team (prior to the World Cup) and, with the City of Bath, will be seeking to attract pre-Olympic and World Championship Training Camps for a number of different sports and International Teams building up to 2012 —thus building a legacy for the nation that will continue beyond the London Games.

  The City is using its resources to support Bath Universities bids and to provide the cultural content of the offering to international sports team so that the athletes stay is enjoyable and one which they would want to repeat. We are seeking to ensure the impact of foreign teams as visitors and tourist is secured for the future.

  However, Bath Rugby Club is a brand known throughout the rugby world. It is a team that plays in the Premier League in England and also in European Cup matches that attracts many thousands of spectators each year, also a significant television audience to the region during the Autumn, Winter and Spring season. It is worth in the region of £5.7 million per annum to the local economy as a visitor and tourist draw.

STADIA

  Bath Rugby Club requires a dedicated 15,000 seat arena of the scale provided by Leicester, Harlequins and Northampton. The Club would prefer to develop at the Recreation Ground; however the sensitivity of the site would require an innovative structure that's sits lightly upon the site and is in total sympathy with its surroundings. Such a solution that would involve considerable expense above the normal value of a 15,000 seat stadium—a cost penalty the Club could only overcome with external financial support.

  The Club is contemplating the prospect of having to move out of the centre of the City to a site with better access from motorways and by train. A new large scale stadium (identified in the SW Cultural Strategy)—in excess of 20,000 seats could provide the catalyst for such a move. This would have a detrimental effect upon the diversity and richness of the City's sporting heritage.

  A new stadium could provide the sporting venue for the whole community as well as the conference venue identified above. Thus it would have a significant benefit in supporting local hoteliers and the programmes of the 18 festivals.

  However the Regional Development Agency's financial streams, the Lottery Funds, nor the PFI Credits (that used to be available to Departments) do not support this type of development.

  It is an area of investment strategy where the negative impact of strategic planning & financial policies remain unidentified by DCMS until the real impact is felt by a City or Town. In this case the attraction of a purpose-built stadium elsewhere in the SW Region, to be supported by the SW Development Agency (see SW Draft Cultural Strategy) will create a significant drag for Bath RFC—as an anchor tenant—away from a City that has nurtured and assisted the developed the Club over many years.

THE CITY'S TOURISM PERFORMANCE

  All these activities attract 4,214,700 visits to the City each year (2005 figures) which is significant. This reflects a scale of visitor numbers that outperforms the other major City attractions—by scale of population, or by physical size.

  In order to develop the profile of the City the Council (October 2003) created an arm length Agency, to work in partnership with the Commercial Sector to develop the Marketing of the destination that is the City of Bath. The organisation provides the links between potential customers and the visitor services—accommodation, transport, venues and events.

  The organisation is known as Bath Tourism Plus (BTP) and is an independent entity controlled by a Board that reflects the balance of the partnership.

INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL MARKETING CHANNELS

  As a destination with worldwide status, (particularly in Britain's key market the USA), BTP works closely with VisitBritain (VB) to access international marketing opportunities, and particularly international media contacts, which would not otherwise be possible.

  With Bath having such a wide international reputation, collaborative working with VB is in many ways more important than the work of the regional tourist organisation, South West Tourism. In this respect, the adequate funding of VB is important for Bath to ensure that it can continue to work in overseas markets and deliver business and media to our destination.

  BTP is concerned that VB funding has been frozen at £35.5 million for several years—well below that for national tourism marketing organisations.

  Results from the International Passenger Survey (IPS) over the last 8 years show growth in overseas visits to major "urban cities" who have significant larger marketing budgets than traditional "heritage cities", such as Bath.




  As such, "heritage cities" such as Bath, Cambridge and York have lost ground to these destinations. As shown from the IPS results below, the biggest impacts for "heritage cities" were felt post 2001 (after the first foot and mouth outbreak and 9/11). Visitor levels for heritage cities are still below those pre-2000.

  The issue for "Heritage Cities" is compounded by the fact that whilst the total number of overseas visitor trips to the UK has increased consistently since 2001, the percentage of these visitors coming to the UK on holiday visits has declined since 2004.

  One impact of the reduced Government funding to VB in real terms is that the campaigns devised by VB require significant "buy in" from destinations. The entry price points for such campaigns—often in excess of £5,000—are packaged at major cities with far greater budgets than other smaller (but no less important) cities such as Bath.

  Bath is simply unable to afford to "buy into" campaigns thus stifling the opportunity for marketing in overseas markets and to target identified customer groups. This destination feels strongly that campaigns should be made more openly available/affordable to key destinations such as Bath.

DEVOLUTION & NATIONAL MARKETING

  The devolution of Scotland & Wales has also impacted on key English destinations such as Bath.

  Funding for national tourism bodies in Scotland (£38.35 million in 2006-07) and Wales (£22.55 million in 2006-07) far outstrips that for England (£12.4 million in 2006-07). This inequality means that destinations in these nations are being marketed to English residents more strongly than those in England. For Bath, the marketing of these destinations is often to our key markets (eg residents from London and the Midlands are targeted ferociously by Wales & Scotland).

REGIONAL SPATIALITY & REGIONAL MARKETING ACTIVITY

  Bath and North East Somerset falls within the remit of the South West RDA which provides funding for SWT. The geography of the South West and the nation's perceptions of what "the South West" is, means that the northern half of the region is often overlooked in tourism marketing. Focus is very much on Devon & Cornwall.

LOW COST CARRIER GROWTH—REQUIREMENT FOR DESTINATION MARKETING

  As with many other cities, the growth in low cost flights from regional airports has an impact on many destinations. Figures from the Civil Aviation Authority show the huge growth in passenger numbers from regional airports:


Airport
% change 1996-2006

Liverpool
702
Bournemouth
512
Exeter
381
Bristol
310

(Source: Civil Aviation Authority 2007).


  On the negative side the opportunities of low cost air travel mean that UK destinations are competing against European counterparts far more than we were 10 years ago. It is clear that regional governments in mainland Europe are providing significant funds to market their destinations to UK and other European citizens, thus creating greater competition for UK destinations. In the case of Bristol Airport currently less than 5% of arrivals are overseas leisure visitors.

  On the positive side, the growth in low cost routes and regional gateways provides a wonderful opportunity for UK destinations with an international reputation such as Bath access to new source markets.

  However, targeted marketing activity to these countries is again stifled by lack of funding. We would call for additional "ring fenced" funding to be made available for this activity—it is vital that marketing of "sub-regions" around regional airports is undertaken in new source countries to ensure that potential visitors are aware of the destinations close to regional airports. For example—many Europeans would know of Bath, but how many would be aware that the city is less than 20 miles from Bristol Airport?

TOURISM DATA/RESEARCH

  There is a requirement for far better, and timelier, delivery of statistics and trends—particularly international data. From a destination viewpoint there seems to have been an almost criminal neglect of research, and where research has taken place the methodology has often changed meaning that long term trend analysis is not possible.

SPECIAL CASE

  Bath and North East Somerset would hesitate to argue that it has a special case to promote. However, in the context of Britain's Historic Cities—(so important for the image of the UK across the world and consequently its balance of returns) Bath Architectural, Heritage & Cultural Offering plays a role in English Tourism that combines—in one discrete City location—a celebration of that which is "special" in the development of England over a 6,000 year history. It combines built environments, cultural celebration and sporting endeavour that are both contemporary and yet brimming with historical reference.

  As a City of 85,000 residents it attracts a disproportionate number of visitors but is prevented from properly managing the impact of those visits by progressive changes in Government Policies.

  Identified above are some of the issues the City is struggling with today. Issues that require external assistance and support to resolve. However as a World Heritage site of considerable importance it should be that DCMS have the knowledge, passion and expertise to identify the impact of changes—and work at mitigating the negative effects.

  Bath and North East Somerset Council would welcome the Select Committee holding a session in the City of Bath's Guildhall and examining, directly, the issues that face an Historic City as a tourism venue.

September 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 10 July 2008