Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 560 - 568)

WEDNESDAY 12 MARCH 2008

MS AVIVA PEARSON, MR ALAN ROBINSON AND MR MALCOLM BELL

  Q560  Mr Sanders: One statistical question. You gave some stats earlier about the value of tourism but what would be really interesting to know is how much of the money that is spent in tourism stays in the local economy today compared with 20 or 30 years ago. Unless you can get that statistic it is very difficult to give a true value of tourism to the local economy. Discuss.

  Mr Bell: I can kick off in one regard without being able to give you that statistic. The one thing that has changed quite dramatically is where visitors are spending. Thirty pence in the pound goes on food and drink and 27% goes on retail. The days of coming down with a tin of sandwiches and a flask of coffee have gone, lunching out, dining out, eating out in the evening is very strong and there are statistics on how that rattles through into the local food and drink sector. It is only about 21% on accommodation because tourism does include day visits. There have been quite big shifts in where the visitor spend goes. If you went back 20 or 30 years ago the amount on accommodation would have been a lot larger and the other aspects of food and drink and retail smaller. That reflects some of the changes in visitor patterns where shopping is part of a holiday experience.

  Ms Pearson: Even though we do not have any concrete statistics on this I am going to give you my professional guestimate that a significant percentage of revenue stays in the English Riviera because a large proportion of our businesses are SMEs or micro-businesses, ma and pa operations. I am not just talking about direct tourism businesses now, I am also talking about retail and even our petrol stations, post offices. Just from using those kinds of levels of intelligence in figuring this out, I would say a large proportion of that revenue would stay in this area. At this current moment in time, although we do know Whitbread is investing, we have very few national chains here where that money would be going elsewhere. If you were going to tackle me down to a percentage I would say 90% of the revenue would stay in the Bay.

  Q561  Mr Sanders: That sounds very, very high. Part of the problem is there are not these statistics, it is all guesswork.

  Ms Pearson: No, unfortunately there are not. I am just basing that on the number of local businesses.

  Q562  Mr Sanders: One of the things that we have been discovering through this inquiry is that it is the lack of statistics that more than anything has probably held the industry back.

  Ms Pearson: I agree with you, and this is why I am also pinning my hopes on the fact that with Partners for England we will iron this out and have one robust mechanism for measuring these statistics so we all fill out one form with one set of questions, no matter how comprehensive, even if there was an incentive not just for the businesses to fill out the forms but also the local authorities and to then hand these forms in to wherever they need to go, be it VisitBritain or DCMS, so they can compile these statistics. We do need to do this as a matter of urgency. We all had to give key statements into Partners for England on what we wished out of this and that was exactly what I wished for, our statistics to be robust.

  Mr Bell: We use a proxy measure. When it comes up to Easter, and you hear me saying, "What's Easter going to be like", as Southwest Tourism we do not go for the statistics, we go to the linen hire companies and laundries. When they say, "Last year was 15% down" and the national statistics come through, those guys hold records and something like linen records, not being funny, are a good base model because they do not change with the weather, they do not change with anything else, and if those guys tell me it is 2% up or 2% down I believe the guys washing the sheets more than I do government statistics. That is a bit of a sad reflection.

  Mr Robinson: From South Hams' perspective in a rural area it is even more extreme in terms of the number of very small businesses and micro businesses. We are pretty confident, given the nature of our area, that a lot of money does stay locally and you can see that in the number of small businesses, and particularly food and drink is a really big issue. Also in historic towns it is quite difficult for some of the major corporate bodies, whether they are retailers or hotels, to get in there and because they are small buildings they often are very much local businesses. We think there is a significant amount of spend captured in South Hams.

  Q563  Chairman: Aviva, I have got a question specifically for you, I think. The Committee came to Torbay because we wanted to visit a traditional English seaside resort and we are aware of the problems facing seaside resorts. This afternoon we have talked to amusement arcade operators, we have visited Paignton Pier and we have heard about the problems that traditional businesses, like arcade operators and the attractions on the pier, are facing. We also heard about the hopes that might come from the establishment of a new casino in Torbay. Do you see the tourist package on offer as changing? Should we adapt to a different kind of tourism package? Should we accept that perhaps the days of "Kiss Me Quick" hats and arcades are now disappearing?

  Ms Pearson: I never want to see a "Kiss Me Quick" hat in Torbay as long as I am here in post. I would like to think we are raising our offer anyway as seen by the marketing. As I was telling you before, we have totally changed the face of who we are addressing to come here either as a short break or a main holiday, and it is working. As I said before, for the first time since 1999 we are back into double digits in the AB1 market, which is the higher spend. I will tell you right now a casino as a product, if it is done in a certain way, which I will explain in a moment, would be a welcome addition to what we have on offer. It would need to be part of an overall entertainment package. It would have to have dinner theatre, a conference centre, it would need to be an iconic building, because it is only a small casino. We are talking a very small part of what could be a very big revenue generator as well as an employer. There are a lot of things we could do with somebody should they come and develop something like this in the Bay, the actual casino operators themselves, where we could say to them, "Fine, we want to see you train this many people in the Bay and it has to have X many local people from this Bay employed. You need to repair this much of the harbour", so section 106, which is something we do anyway. I feel the casino, as a product, would fit very well in here. I mean a tasteful casino. I know today on the pier the gentlemen who were there from BACTA were trying to compare us with Las Vegas and Dubai, but those are totally the wrong people to compare us with because regardless, if we have a casino or not, we need to compare ourselves like for like. You can compare us to Atlantic City and we will beat them hands-down and I would say that to anybody from Atlantic city. We have so much product on offer here and a casino would fit in very well with the offer that we currently have.

  Q564  Chairman: And arcades and bingo halls are also part of that offer?

  Ms Pearson: They are already here and obviously if a developer approaches them and wants to make them into a 5 star resort and that is where we would be pushing, we cannot say it is not welcome. There is still a segment of the visitor population we have coming here for their short breaks and main holidays who do want to go to bingo halls. Do not forget that amusement arcades are there for the children and casinos do not let anyone in who is under-18, so they still have to have that element of entertainment. If a family says it is okay for their son to spend his pocket money on trying to win one of those crazy frogs, who are we to stop them from enjoying themselves? As long as there is a market for that, and the gentlemen you spoke to this afternoon at Paignton Pier said there was one, then we are addressing a proportion of the population who feel that is entertainment.

  Q565  Mr Sanders: I would like to ask about the Olympics. This week LOCOG announced the details of the Cultural Olympiad, which is tailor made for seaside resorts to back on to. Does the southwest see itself as being a venue for a major Cultural Olympiad event? If so, what? Aviva and Alan, are your areas going to be putting in bids to be part of the Cultural Olympiad?

  Ms Pearson: From what I understand, yes, we are, through our Culture and Leisure Department and working in co-ordination we will be putting together a bid. I do see this as a fantastic way of offering, just like we did for SeaBritain. I can see us operating the same way with this Cultural Olympiad between the arts and culture and we can put together a fantastic offer together with everyone else in the southwest.

  Mr Robinson: From South Hams' perspective we have not made a judgment on it and I do not know the details of the proposals. The issue we have had in relation to the Olympics is it is going to be happening during the summer and that is when we are pretty full.

  Q566  Mr Sanders: The Cultural Olympiad runs for four years in the run-up, so you could run an event next year, the following year, the following year and the following year.

  Mr Robinson: We have not made a judgment or discussed that as a corporate body yet.

  Mr Bell: My view, and I totally agree with Alan, is the biggest enemy to sustainability of tourism, the economy or anything else is seasonality and there is not an awful lot we can do about that, but yes there is and that is called clever events and clever activities that feature us outside so people are not coming necessarily thinking they must have sunshine but are coming to a great part of the world. The whole approach to a major events strategy, incorporating all the local events, gets that richness across. It is quite right, we have got a great opportunity to get our acts together on events that feature in those lull periods, and we do get them. We have got Easter coming up, but we know we get a lull after that increasingly in the shoulder from May through to the school holidays because of SATs tests and whatever. It is a great opportunity to lay on events at that particular time as well as other lull points which will attract markets which are not deterred through external factors such as the school holidays and SATs. We have to be cute and clever about it and if you are laying on an event for tourists it has got to be as popular, if not more, with local people and we should get two hits on it. I think it is a great opportunity to get our events approach right.

  Q567  Mr Sanders: Is the southwest expecting more visitors during the year of 2012 or fewer?

  Mr Bell: If we get it wrong there will be fewer. I am a man who took up this job when the eclipse came along. What I mean by if we get it wrong is the first message is we have to make sure people do not think they have got to stay away. The first challenge of communication is making sure that people do not go, "Oh, the Olympics are on, we have got to stay away" and you can build on it. You have to take this market by market. Six million people in the Commonwealth owe their roots to the southwest, genealogy is the third most popular thing on the Internet and we have got great opportunities to say, "If your name comes from here and you are coming for the Olympics, come down to the southwest". You can use it in different ways to deliver your second objective, which is to have more, but it has got to be very cute with the events, the activities, how you tackle different markets and the connection of Plymouth with the American market. We can be cute about it, but if we get it wrong there will be less.

  Q568  Philip Davies: Can I ask one final thing of Malcolm which we cannot let not be asked. In the written submission from Helpful Holidays, who are going to give evidence next, they said: "We believe that the activities of Southwest tourism are not highly valued by the majority of accommodation, attraction or other businesses who serve the needs of visitors to the southwest. Only a minority of businesses are members." They are the people at the chalk face of this, so how would you respond to the accusation that you are more of a hindrance than a help to them?

  Mr Bell: We have got 5,000 members, so that is not a small number. There are probably about 15,000 businesses in the whole, but if you take those 5,000 members they represent the vast majority of National Quality Assured, so it is a large, large number. The challenge in the business I would segment in different ways. If this was a massive industry run by corporates we would not be needed, but it is a massive industry run by small and micro businesses. The ones that are very good and very effective in their marketing because they have backgrounds in other areas can get on and do lots of themselves, and they should. We are here to help businesses more at a destination level to help them with operational issues about filling their beds this year and doing things like that, or else they will be exposed. Regionally we are here looking at the markets for the future to keep them competitive because there is not that operational and corporate planning strategic role. There is validity in the point that not all businesses need Tourist Boards, and in an ideal world they would not need a Tourist Board because they would have the skills and ability to do it, but we have a very fragmented industry which is massive in terms of economic value but run by micro and small businesses, which is our strength in giving us some uniqueness and diversity but it is also our weakness in working with them. I do argue that we have got a role but I would not argue that everybody should be a member and everybody needs Southwest Tourism, the more that do not because they can do it themselves the better.

  Chairman: Can I thank the three of you very much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 10 July 2008