Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 569 - 579)

WEDNESDAY 12 MARCH 2008

MS LYNNE HOOKINGS, MR JOHN MILNE HOME AND MR MORAY BOWATER

  Q569  Chairman: We now move to the second part of this session. I would like to welcome Lynne Hookings, the Chairman of the Torbay Tourism Forum; John Milne Home, the Secretary of the Tamar Valley Tourism Association; and Moray Bowater, General Manager of Helpful Holidays. Can I perhaps remind you to speak up, please, when you answer because I think it is quite difficult to hear at the back. You have heard the evidence we have just been given as to how the RDA and the local authorities see the state of tourism in this part of the world. Can you tell us your impression? Are things getting better, are things getting worse or, as was said before, are you holding your own?

  Mr Milne Home: We believe business last year was as was, it has not changed very much. I have a little cottage, it was the same number of weeks last year as previously, which was about 29, so no problem.

  Ms Hookings: I actually wrote down "holding our own" when two of the speakers said it because I was quite surprised. I feel that even standing still, if we can claim to be doing that rather than going backwards, is in effect a retrograde step, we are not progressing, we are not growing visitor numbers, we are not growing businesses necessarily. In fact, the number of businesses has declined substantially since I moved to Torbay in 1975. I have only been here 33 years, but that is quite a long time. Everybody looking for another outlet went every which way they could, whether it was into self-catering or retirement homes and now back to residential. Even with a substantial loss, probably 40-50% of the bed spaces to Torbay, it did not mean that everybody else remaining in the accommodation market suddenly excelled in business, it did not mean that at all. We lost our stock, we lost our choice, if you like, and it did not have the resultant effect many people thought it would do. Whether you are speaking to the serviced accommodation base or self-service accommodation base, everybody in the Bay would say to you, "We are open for business and yes, please, we need more". Nobody is running at capacity, certainly not throughout the year. Another thing that was said by the earlier speakers was about growing tourism into an all-year round industry. This is something we have talked about almost ad nauseam, and we are still trying to do that. We are still trying to get exciting events to cause people to move their holiday patterns either side of the main holiday periods. I think the private sector has probably had a jolly good go at helping itself. Certainly from my perspective with the Tourism Forum, we have done the benchmarking visits, regarding resort regeneration we have done best practice, we have done tremendous training to make the people involved in the industry, whether it is just the husband and wife partnerships or the larger businesses employing 300 or 400 staff, and we have certainly helped them develop their staff and make it a more professional industry but there is an awful long way we still have to go.

  Mr Bowater: I think it would be fair to say we are going great guns. We have been growing at about 10% a year for the last ten years. We are hitting our head against the top of what is feasible in terms of bookings. We average about 32 weeks per year per cottage now. Beyond that the cost of sales becomes too high to make letting more weeks than that viable for most owners and for us. If we could get more stock we would let it. From our point of view, our sector of the industry right across Devon and Cornwall, because we operate in both counties, is going great guns.

  Q570  Chairman: Would you say that applies to the whole of the sector in the self-catering holiday cottage area of tourism?

  Mr Bowater: I think that most of the agencies that operate in the mid to top end of the market have seen similar levels of growth over the course of the last ten years. We are struggling to keep up with the rate at which our main competitors take on new stock. We see them growing at about 10% a year as well and they would not be taking on that stock if they could not let it, so their bookings must be roaring along as well.

  Q571  Chairman: Has there been a general shift from the traditional seaside hotel towards the kind of holiday which you are offering?

  Mr Bowater: I suspect there has been a huge shift, yes. The sort of holiday that we are offering has become more popular because private sector operators like us have driven quality. Because we understand the market we have told owners that unless they produce a product of sufficient quality that people are going to want to rent for a week or two weeks they will not get any bookings, and that process continues and is ongoing and will continue forever. Quality has to be good because that is what provides value. If we do not have good quality we do not have good value.

  Mr Milne Home: I would support Moray entirely. I am one of the end users, not yours but another company, and they inspect us, they maintain the standard and they are acknowledged as a proper assessment centre by VisitBritain, but VisitBritain will not accept that qualification from us for NQAS assessment. We do not know why they will not look at it. It is infuriating because we believe that our standard, driven by Farm & Cottage Holidays, is quite excellent.

  Mr Bowater: I would say that the reason why they will not accept it is because they do not get a fee for it.

  Mr Milne Home: I think that is absolutely right, but not just a fee, a bloody large fee that cuts everybody out. If you look at it, to join VisitBritain you have to spend 70 or 80 quid and then 120 quid yearly to be inspected and that is nigh on nearly 200 quid or more, and that is a week's rent for a small cottage.

  Q572  Chairman: We are going to come back to the NQAS scheme shortly. I just want to probe a little further on one aspect. We received evidence earlier in the inquiry from Travelodge, who are expanding massively, opening hotels every month, so clearly they are doing all right and you are doing all right. The sector which appears to be struggling is the traditional Victorian rather faded seaside hotel. Is it just that in order to make that attractive again one would have to spend a huge amount of money because these rather elderly hotels at the moment do not offer the kind of holiday which people want?

  Ms Hookings: The hoteliers that have spent on Victorian villas in Torbay in the large are enjoying good trade. They are reinvesting in their product and are succeeding whereas others are slipping back. You are right, what used to be the traditional holidaymaker to Torbay has totally changed. Whereas a privately owned hotel can boast varying degrees of quality, whichever standard, whichever rating they have achieved, a much more personal service, many more facilities to look after them than, shall we say, a budget brand hotel, the market is such that there is room for both. A lot of people would feel that by buying a brand, ie Travelodge or Premier Travel Inn that are coming here, they know what they are buying, they are buying more a purpose-built environment in which to sleep for the night, if you like, at a recognised price. Victorian villas and conversions, however well done, have tremendous variation and sometimes people feel safe knowing what they are buying. Having said that much, we are very lucky down here because in Torbay most of the properties are privately owned, they are not chains of hotels. We have a couple of chains in the Bay but not very many at all. We have the best of both worlds probably.

  Q573  Philip Davies: Moray, I quoted your evidence in the previous session and you were very critical of public sector marketing campaigns. In fact, you were very critical of the public sector generally in your evidence from what I could read. You said that the public sector marketing was poorly monitored, it was based on guesswork, over the last 10 years you estimated the combined spend had been between £50 million and £100 million on marketing alone, and that a close analysis of your participation in these campaigns revealed they infrequently generate inquiries that result in sales. The people we had before were saying that they needed more money to spend on marketing but it seems to me you are suggesting they should have less money to spend on marketing. Why are they wrong and you are right?

  Mr Bowater: I think what they said during the course of their evidence was that they do guess on the effectiveness and the feedback that they got from their marketing campaigns and they do not have any way of measuring the effectiveness of those marketing campaigns. The stats that were quoted during the previous evidence suggested that £150 million on marketing is probably an underestimate, it is nearer £300 million.

  Q574  Philip Davies: So who should be spending the money on marketing if they should not be doing it because they do not know what they are doing?

  Mr Bowater: Businesses that benefit from the results of those marketing campaigns. I do not think the public sector should put any money into marketing campaigns unless it can be demonstrated that those marketing campaigns produce a return for taxpayers. That does not mean just measuring return on investment in terms of, "We have spent £1 and got people to spend £40 on a booking", that means how much tax has the Exchequer received as a result of the £1 that has been spent on a public sector marketing initiative. There is no hard evidence, and there has not been in all the time that I have worked in this business, that any public sector marketing campaigns actually work because they cannot monitor them properly. You said that you worked in marketing and if you had gone to a meeting and presented a proposal which suggested that you were going to spend X amount of money and you would take a wild guess at whether or not it had produced any results at the end of it, I think you would have been laughed out of the boardroom.

  Q575  Philip Davies: The argument, and you probably heard it from Malcolm Bell earlier, is that your organisation may well be big enough to look after itself and to market yourselves effectively because of the scale of your organisation, but lots of places in Torbay might be a one-man-band or husband and wife team and they have not got the wherewithal, the money, to spend on marketing, they cannot afford to and, therefore, they need a regional body. You might be all right, but what about everybody else in a place like Torbay, surely they need somebody to do something for them?

  Mr Bowater: That was the position that all of our owners were in before they phoned us up and said, "Do you think you could do some marketing for us?" and we said we would be delighted to. At the beginning of this submission I said we could take on more properties if we could find more owners who would give us their properties to let, and there are agencies like ours all over the southwest all of whom are scrabbling around for properties to try and let. The reason why an owner in Torbay or anywhere else in the southwest might not choose to use a marketing agency like Helpful Holidays or Farm & Cottage Holidays, or Classic Cottages down in Cornwall, all of whom do an excellent job, is because they do not like the cost of that and the public sector is stepping in to provide a cheaper route to market but a less effective one.

  Q576  Philip Davies: Lynne and John, you are at the coalface so you can adjudicate between the two arguments. Whose side of the argument are you on, Moray's or Malcolm's?

  Ms Hookings: I can see both sides of the argument. I am not simply asking the public sector to put their hands in their pockets and sustain us just for the sake of throwing more money at marketing, but the public sector is very necessary in creating brand awareness and marketing the area and the facilities rather than each and every micro business trying to do that. They are struggling to market themselves effectively. Here in Torbay we obviously latch onto the Torbay Development Agency, our own Tourist Board marketing, to promote the brand of the English Riviera. A micro could not do that on their own. It is not a question of just taking the money from the public sector because even with that money, whether it has come back from government by way of some form of grant for Torbay or grant from whichever pot of gold, do not forget the people who are living here are still putting their money and contributions into the local economy, it is not just for the benefit of the accommodation or the tourism sector because anybody who is brought here who has any level of spending power is going to be spending it, whether it is on a taxi, a bus or a deckchair on the beach, if you like. If tourism is allowed to fall any lower in Torbay it will have a severe effect on the whole economy of the area because, sadly, we do not have a balanced economy here at all. We tried to move into the higher wage economy and we got all excited when we had Nortel and the like, but what happened, they have all gone and all that is left is the fishing and the tourism.

  Q577  Philip Davies: So you acknowledge that a body needs to spend money for the benefit of the micro businesses but in a word, yes or no, is the money they spend on marketing at the moment well-spent or not?

  Ms Hookings: I would say at a local level what the Tourist Board is spending is well-spent because they have not got a huge pot of money to spend. A lot of the income from that money actually comes from the private sector buying into the guide which they are marketing. On a national level I think we are very poorly funded and as far as England is concerned I do not like the disparity with the spend between Scotland and Wales. That is not because I am English, I am Scottish and was brought up in Wales, so I am a right mixture. The disparity is quite shocking per head of population.

  Mr Milne Home: I would agree with Lynne that we need something in addition, without doubt. If you think of the Association, certainly from my perspective, we look down, we do not look out at all. The leaflets I just handed out, 10,000 of them are printed and are pushed out locally, we do not actually send them up to London, we have to rely on Malcolm Bell and his organisation to spread the word abroad and elsewhere in Britain to bring the people in. I would agree with what Lynne said.

  Q578  Mr Sanders: There are obviously different jobs at different levels to be undertaken here. Lynne has almost answered what I wanted to ask. Are we really talking about branding rather than marketing and what we need is a brand that is not just tourism, it is a brand for any products that are made in the area, for any services that are sold in the area, for any creative industries that there might be in the area. This seems to me to be what Cornwall has been very good at with a Cornish brand that runs right across from pasties to self-catering accommodation to diving schools. It is not a marketing budget that Aviva necessarily needs, it is a branding and a brand that runs consistently right across all the strata of an area.

  Mr Milne Home: I am sure you are right. I would not be able to argue the differences, I am afraid.

  Ms Hookings: We all recognise brands, so they are obviously important and they are obviously highly valuable. We are talking about the Travelodges, Travel Inns, et cetera, everybody recognises the brands, so it is very powerful, and if we can brand—

  Q579  Mr Sanders: The only equivalent that we have to a board of directors in a company is our community and, therefore, it can only be a public sector endeavour that creates that brand, or at least markets that brand.

  Ms Hookings: I think the public sector has a big return. I am only speaking for Torbay, as you understand, but Torbay Council would have severe problems if the income from tourism went any lower because they are one of the biggest earners from tourism. I know they have to spend a lot on the beaches, the toilets, et cetera, and we have a problem having 22 miles of coastline and some of our beaches, sadly, are now closed and many of our toilets are now closed, or demolished in fact. They have a big problem, but at the end of the day they also have big earnings from the presence of tourism.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 10 July 2008