Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Letter from The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) to the Chairman

  The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) welcomes the decision of the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee to call an inquiry into ticket touting.

  The ECB is the governing body for cricket in England and Wales. Our remit is to develop the game from Playground to Test Arena.

  By far our biggest concern with the impact of touting is that it reduces the opportunities for genuine cricket fans and families to attend matches.

  The ECB, like most other sports, prices our tickets not at the economic maximum level, but at a price which we feel reflects our position as a national sport seeking to encourage those who follow and play the game to attend major matches. This policy is gradually being eroded by touts who are ever more sophisticated in the way they secure tickets.

  The ECB has contributed to submissions made to your inquiry by the Five Sports (ECB, The FA, LTA, RFL and RFU) and by the Sports Rights Owners Coalition (SROC). We fully support the call for Government legislation to protect sport from touting.

  In addition to these submissions, the ECB thought the following evidence would be helpful to the Committee's inquiry:

  1.  A recent independent survey the ECB commissioned that demonstrates that 76% of people believe that regulations against ticket touting are needed.

  2.  Details of correspondence that the ECB entered into with eBay ahead of the last Ashes series asking them to work with us, on a voluntary basis, to stop known touting. This request was refused which leads us to conclude that a statutory approach is required.

  3.  The requirement of the International Cricket Council (ICC) that action is taken to prevent ticket touting at the major Championships that have been awarded to the UK in 2009 and 2019.

76% of people agree (or strongly agree) that regulations against touting are needed

  The ECB recently commissioned Independent polling on ticket touting. We wanted to secure objective confirmation of our view that this was an issue on which there was widespread support for action. We subsequently forwarded this evidence to the DCMS Ticket Touting Summit and attach a copy of the evidence with this submission.

  The Committee will see that only 6% of the public are favourable to the actions of ticket touts and internet auction sites. 76% of people agree (or strongly agree) with the statement `there should be regulation or government legislation of ticket sales to sporting events to prevent touts selling them at greater than face value'. Just 7% disagree.

Voluntary action has not worked

  The ECB has been one of the representatives at the DCMS Ticket Touting summits. We welcomed the decision of the Secretary of State to establish these. It has been a very useful forum to discuss touting.

   Initially it was hoped that voluntary action could address this issue. A Statement of Principles was drawn up by the Secretary of State to which all sides were asked to abide. Unfortunately this has not been a success. Ahead of the second summit, the Secretary of State expelled the Association of Secondary Ticket Agents from attendance due to the fact that their members were refusing to comply with even the most basic of requirements.

  At one of the Summits I raised with eBay the touting of tickets that was occurring for the last Ashes series held in Australia and asked for their help, within the spirit of the statement of principles, to address this problem. Cricket Australia had put in place stringent measures to prevent ticket touting, including terms and conditions that made a ticket void if it were sold on and other methods of ticket identification. More than 3,000 tickets were cancelled in this way.

  Despite this approach and the accompanying warnings by Cricket Australia, tickets to the value of approximately £10,000 were being traded each day in the weeks leading up to the Ashes. In some cases, as in England in 2005, some of these tickets did not actually exist leading to supporters spending thousands of pounds to travel to Australia only to be disappointed on arrival.

  I attach for the Committee's information a copy of this letter. Unfortunately I received no response and eBay continued to allow tickets to be sold. Our conclusion is that only statutory measures will be sufficient to protect sport and our fans.

Meeting the International Cricket Council's requirements for major events to be staged in the UK

  Last year the ECB was delighted to have been awarded the rights to stage the ICC Twenty20 World Championship 2009 and the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019.These events will give a great boost to cricket, helping us attract more people to the game. They will also attract fans from all over the world.

  The ECB bid was successful because we had wholehearted support from the Government, and from across all political parties, to work with us stage a successful tournament. At the time of bidding, we communicated to DCMS Ministers and officials that one of the ICC's requirements was for their to be effective protection against ticket touting at these tournaments.

  Richard Caborn made the following statement at the time of the announcement:

        "I congratulate the ECB for winning the right to host the ICC Twenty20 World Championship 2009 and the ICC Cricket World Cup 2019. The ECB have put together a bid that will ensure not just wonderful tournaments but also a lasting sporting legacy, and involvement of cricket supporters from all over the world. We will now work with both the ECB and ICC, giving all support possible, to making these tournaments a success".

  Since then the ECB, and the ICC Chief Executive, have met with Richard Caborn to discuss this issue. We have also raised it at the Ticket Touting Summits. We are very encouraged that at a recent meeting the Secretary of State acknowledged that this was an important issue and had asked her officials to draw up measures for protecting major sporting events.

June 2007



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 10 January 2008