Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Tom Collis

WHAT CHANNEL 4 IS PREPARED TO SPEND ITS MONEY ON

    —    100 million+ in three years marketing "the brand".

    —    £100 million+ over five years on "forefront of technology" IT.

    —    £30 million in 2006 alone on so-called new media, including a seemingly bottomless pit of simpering ninnies presenting quiz call programmes... and a radio station (how on earth did this happen?).

    —    £1.5 million on an events company in order to promote its cooking programmes (words fail me).

    —    staff salaries averaging £70k (when even the BBC only forks out £50k).

    —    £3 million on the mean-spirited an unwatched Space Cadets, with presumably a similar amount expended on the equally pointless Unanimous.

    —    £40 million on an American imported programme, Desperate Housewives. This works out at about £1 million an episode, when the Code of Practice indicates that it will pay £150k for a documentary (surely what Channel 4 is supposed to be doing)—the justification of this decision should make interesting reading.

    —    £180 million on ensuring that members of the public who really should have been sectioned, receive not 15 minutes but endless dreary hours of fame on Big Brother for another three years.

    —    £5 million+ on a VoD service, where the level of "demand" and any return on "public service" cash seems to have been inconsequential commercial annoyances.

WHAT CHANNEL 4 IS APPARENTLY NOT PREPARED TO SPEND ITS MONEY ON

    —    quality public service programming (whatever happened to its responsibility to provide alternative viewing to that on other channels).

    —    its share of digital switchover costs; asking for a government handout instead.

  This "not for profit" broadcaster is run by an ex-sketch writer for The Two Ronnies, the marketing man for I Can't Believe it's Not Butter and a chap who owns a chain of Belgian-themed restaurants; all of whom have therefore produced gags of a type in their own separate ways.

  Unfortunately, the last laugh seems to be on the general public. At least the advertising agencies who are about to be subject to an unwarranted 5% hike in charges by the salesmen at Channel 4 now have an alternative in ITV. We can only hope that in terms of programmes also, Michael Grade can resurrect his new venture at the expense of his old one [...]

3 December 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 15 November 2007