Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 60 - 63)

TUESDAY 26 JUNE 2007

DR ALI ANSARI, DR TOBY DODGE, DR ERIC HERRING, DR GLEN RANGWALA AND PROFESSOR SAMI ZUBAIDA

  Q60  Linda Gilroy: Not recently trained to operate under a democracy, of sorts?

  Professor Zubaida: Democracy is laughable.

  Dr Rangwala: If one wants to talk opinion polls, and a number of my colleagues have cited opinion polls, I think the most revealing answer in a recent opinion poll from March this year to "Who do you think runs Iraq?" was that over half the population said they believed the US Governments still run Iraq. I think, there, at least, the question of who one is obeying when one takes one's orders becomes the relevant indicator, not the question of "Can I do this if I want to do this?" which is the training question.

  Q61  Linda Gilroy: Was that throughout the whole of Iraq, and we are discussing southern Iraq at the moment and the role of the British in training there. As I have understood it, when we were there last year, there was a programme that would take a period of time; there was always the thought that we would be withdrawing. Clearly, we are not going to say precisely when we are going to withdraw because that would be a hostage to fortune, but we are talking as if that had never been, as if there had never been any differences in the southern area at all, and is not, in fact, the essential difficulty linked to what the US position is? The point drawn out in relation to David Hamilton's question, that in fact you are talking about the lines of exit for the US troops, important lines of exit, being through the south?

  Dr Rangwala: I think I would disagree slightly with Dr Dodge on that point; the US can protect the roads and the exit route, as it were, without having to take control of Basra city, in keeping the transit route through from Kuwait. My sense is, at least, that the sense that the Iraqis do not own their country, which I think is prevalent, both amongst the Sunnis as well as amongst the Shi'a population of Iraq, not so much amongst the Kurds but amongst the Arab population of Iraq, is a very damaging one. It is why there is, I think, such rampant corruption, why there is tapping of oil pipelines by political parties which otherwise are in charge of the country. They have those resources at their disposal in any case, but they are still profiteering from the use of these resources on the side because they feel that this is, as it were, "a process that we need to exploit rather than a process that we need to manage," so I think that is a very damaging perception.

  Q62  Mr Jenkin: Can I just ask a rather provocative question; there was a poll done in March which suggested that still the majority of Iraqis would not bring back Saddam Hussein. Is it the opinion of Iraqis that it was still the right thing, to get rid of Saddam Hussein, in your view?

  Dr Herring: Polling on that has gradually declined to a position where overall nationally you have a relatively even split either way, all things considered. Was it the right thing? You can find one recent poll, in March, when there was actually a very narrow favour saying, all things considered, the invasion was wrong. My recollection was that was the first time ever, but there has been a decline. Obviously, when you break that down in sectarian terms you tend to get a much happier view in the north, which of course mostly was the north-east, which mostly was not occupied, and of course, pretty relentlessly, critical views in Sunni Arab areas. Of course, no-one has asked two million Iraqis, who are now scattered into surrounding countries, how positive they are about the invasion, we suspect they might be pretty not positive, or dead people, if they could vote on this, what they would say. I think it is looking pretty bad, even on that measure now it is not looking good at all, and in terms of what Iraqis are being asked about what they would prefer, a strong man democracy, and so on, the first preference is democracy, as in choosing to change your leader, the second preference is then some form of Islamic state, and the third preference is a strong man for life, and that does trail still, the distant third.

  Q63  Chairman: Two million dead; where do you get that figure from?

  Dr Herring: No; sorry, two million refugees, so not dead.

  Professor Zubaida: From another long-term perspective, and I have seen many years of Iraqi history, every regime change, in its wake, makes people nostalgic for the previous one. I think, given the dire situation in Iraq at the moment, all the previous regimes appear preferable to the present situation.

  Mr Hamilton: That is also true of governments.

  Chairman: Thank you, gentlemen. Thank you very much indeed for giving up your morning to us in so informative and helpful a way. We are deeply grateful. It was most interesting and helpful. I am now going to declare a short break while we wait for our next witness, but thank you very much indeed.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 3 December 2007