Select Committee on Defence Second Report


Conclusions and recommendations


1.  We commend the MoD for renaming Request for Resources 2 "Operations and Peacekeeping", which more accurately describes what it covers. (Paragraph 2)

2.  We continue to believe that the estimated costs of military operations should be presented in the Main Estimates. We are disappointed that the Government has not been persuaded of this. We reiterate our compromise suggestion that—at least—the MoD provide in its estimates memorandum for the Main Estimates an account of its planning assumptions for the costs of military operations in the financial year ahead. Notwithstanding the uncertainty of cost estimates at the beginning of the financial year, the MoD must surely have planning assumptions. We can see no reason why these should not be shared with Parliament. We expect the MoD to respond fully to this recommendation in its response to this Report. (Paragraph 7)

3.  We repeat our earlier recommendation that provision for operations in the Balkans should be set out in the MoD's Main Estimate, and hope that this will be done in the Main Estimates 2008-09. (Paragraph 9)

4.  Unless the MoD can present, in the response to this report, a compelling reason for continuing current practice, we shall expect provision for operations in the Balkans to be made in the MoD's Winter Supplementary Estimate 2008-09—if not already made in the Main Estimates. (Paragraph 10)

5.  The Winter Supplementary Estimate estimates the additional costs of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2007-08 as £1,315 million in resources and £604 million in capital. … The forecast net additional costs of operations in 2007-08 are £955 million for Iraq and £964 million for Afghanistan. (Paragraph 11)

6.  The cost of operations in Afghanistan is forecast to increase by 39% in the current year. Given the increase in UK Forces in Afghanistan in the current year, and the continuing high operational tempo, this is perhaps not very surprising. It is striking, however, that three-quarters of the increase is attributable to capital additions. We recommend that, in the response to this report, the MoD provide more detail on the capital programmes involved. (Paragraph 13)

7.  It may seem surprising that the cost of operations in Iraq is forecast to increase in the current year by 2%, despite the drawdown in UK Forces over the year. The increase is accounted for by large increases in infrastructure costs, equipment support costs and capital additions. … The requirement to invest in facilities at Basra Airport, and to improve force protection, appears to explain the increase in the cost of operations in Iraq this year. (Paragraph 14)

8.  It is, however, a little surprising that the military personnel costs for Iraq are expected to fall by only 5% this year, despite the considerable drawdown of UK Forces over the year. And it is striking that the forecast military personnel costs for Iraq (£95 million) considerably exceed those for Afghanistan (£62 million). … We recommend that, in the response to this report, the MoD explain in more detail why military personnel costs for Iraq are expected to fall by only 5% in the current year. (Paragraph 15)

9.  It is likely that the actual additional costs of military operations in 2007-08 will exceed the amounts requested in the Winter Supplementary Estimate, and that the MoD will be required to ask for more money for operations in the Spring Supplementary Estimates. (Paragraph 19)

10.  The outturn for 2006-07 operations was less than the sums planned by the Department: the MoD over-estimated the cost of its operations and peacekeeping by £75 million (4%). This comprised an underspend on capital costs of £101 million, offset by a resource overspend of £26 million. (Paragraph 22)

11.  We welcome the inclusion in the Annual Report and Accounts of an explanation of the variation between voted provision and outturn for 2006-07. Given the unpredictability of military operations, it is understandable that there should be variation between the Estimates and the outturn. However, we look to the MoD to ensure that its estimates are as robust as possible and, in particular, that the estimates on capital costs should be based on realistic expectations of when Urgent Operational Requirements will be delivered. (Paragraph 24)

12.  We recommend that the House of Commons approve the request for resources set out in the MoD's Winter Supplementary Estimate. The £1,919 million requested to meet the forecast cost of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2007-08 is a large amount of public money, but it is essential that our Armed Forces are properly resourced to carry out the task which they have been given. The sum requested includes investment in new equipment and force protection, which has been welcomed by all sides of the House. (Paragraph 25)



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 5 December 2007