Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Memorandum from the British Limbless Ex-Service Men's Association (BLESMA)

  The British Limbless Ex-Service Men's Association (BLESMA) supports all serving and ex- service men and women who lose limbs or the use of limbs in service and those who lose an eye or the use of an eye. Amongst its objectives is the provision of a professional welfare service and it runs two care homes. For new amputees it provides a conciliary service and a number of challenging and social rehabilitation events. By way of example in December 2006 we had new Members injured earlier in the year learning to ski in the Rocky Mountains. We are acknowledged experts on the old War Pension Scheme and very involved with high profile injury aspects of the new AFCS 05. BLESMA has 2,400 Members, over half of whom were injured in World War II. We also look after widows of members, which number 1,900.

  The Association knows every BLESMA category casualty of recent conflicts including Afghanistan and Iraq. It knows all serving amputees—and keeps the MoD up to date in this respect. There are presently nearly approximately 60 serving BLESMA category personnel. There have been, we believe, 51 BLESMA category injuries in Afghanistan and Iraq—More than half of these in the last 16 months. Thus far comparatively few have left HM Forces. We support realistic retention and we hope that where eventual medical discharge is unavoidable that it does not take place until the soldier is as fit and ready for civilian life as is possible.

  BLESMA is very familiar with Selly Oak. Naturally we lament the closure of military hospitals but we do believe that to sustain high standards of technical medical care today would be unrealistic, and could dilute medical availability on the front line. We have watched the military presence evolve within Selly Oak and our new Members generally respond well to the nursing and welfare care they receive. We have seen distinct improvements in medical care coordination in the sense that the patient medical pathway though Selly Oak, sick leave and rehabilitation at Headley Court is now much better. We believe there is some evidence of discontinuity in welfare care aspects and we have had to bring expertise and sometimes resources to bear—this is more to do with lack of experience rather than lack of resources. A typical example might be ensuring the parents' home is actually suitable for a wheelchair—we can find the ramps, or knowing how to enlist the (statutory) assistance of local authorities in providing adequate social and nursing cover.

  BLESMA has developed a good relationship with military medical authorities and we are normally invited to meet new amputees shortly after their arrival at Selly Oak. An initial visit allows us to explain what BLESMA can do for those still serving and what advice we are able to give regarding pensions/AFCS and DWP allowances, which we have detailed knowledge and experience of. Shortly thereafter one of our experienced professional Welfare Officers (all former LE Officers) will visit with a BLESMA Member bearing a similar injury.

  This normally has a major and positive impact and exposure to prosthetic application is usually a matter of intense interest. The overriding object of this early exposure is to map out the disabled life ahead optimistically but realistically. We work and liaise closely with service welfare organisations and they value our specialist knowledge and experience.

  BLESMA does not provide prosthetic equipment. We believe the state should always provide this and we do not believe serving personnel or veterans should have to resort to private providers. However prosthetic provision is vulnerable to the vagaries of the "postcode lottery", an invidious situation for serving soldiers and veterans. Hitherto MoD medical authorities were not particularly aware of all the implications as soldiers moved and were posted to different parts of the country. We proposed to the MoD that a measure of centralised provision could be set up using DMRC Headley Court. Our hope was that Headley Court could become the centre of excellence for those newly injured and their "limb centre" whilst they remained in service—wherever they might be posted. For prosthetic users continuity is best served through the relationships established at a limb centre. We were more than pleased to hear that this service of care to in-service prosthetics was to be extended to all those already serving—if they so wished. We are pleased with the technical provision being offered and we doubt that "limb centres" around the country could afford some of the prescriptions on offer. Our concern for the future is that this will highlight poor provision due to under funding in a number of Trusts, when service men and women are discharged in the years ahead. It is generally received wisdom in the prosthetic industry, which provides services to the DofH, that provision of much that is provided at Headley Court would not be possible due to ever present financial constraints. It has long been a BLESMA contention that disabled veterans did not lose their limbs for a particular locality but for the whole country. We have alerted the MoD to this problem and we have been informed that structures and/or procedures are being explored to deal with this problem. This is becoming urgent as medical discharges are now beginning to take place for those who have been prescribed high tech and expensive prosthetic equipment whilst under MoD care.

  BLESMA has a long history of providing challenging rehabilitive training in a social environment. We believe this compliments the excellent physical rehabilitation casualties receive at Headley Court. We provide a special fellowship of shared experience that not only provides practical advice and support it also relieves the tensions and pressures that might otherwise lead to damaging psychological injury. By way of example we focus on developing amputee teamwork using offshore sailing and adventure training weeks in Scotland, which help individual confidence. In December we will be taking 15 Members to Colorado as guests of the US Wounded Warrior Project for adaptive ski training. 10 members of our group will still be serving. We believe such rehabilitation is an important part of the medical/healing process. Generally we try to do all our rehabilitation "in house"—on an amputee looking after amputee basis.

  BLESMA is a body that represents serving and ex service amputees individually and collectively. We will work with government where our aims and intentions converge but we campaign to right what we perceive to be wrong. In the field of medical care there is much convergence and improvements in prosthetic provision and rehabilitation are to be applauded. But—we are with our Members for life and we remain on watch.

23 November 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 18 February 2008