Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 480-493)

DEREK TWIGG MP, LIEUTENANT-GENERAL ROBERT BAXTER CBE, LIEUTENANT-GENERAL LOUIS LILLYWHITE MBE QHS, MR BEN BRADSHAW MP, PROFESSOR LOUIS APPLEBY AND MR ANDREW CASH

27 NOVEMBER 2007

  Q480  Willie Rennie: And other health professionals, is there advice given to them? Are their work colleagues given advice about how to deal with them?

  Mr Cash: Yes. People do a round of promoting this, so in most organisations, and again we need to re-emphasise this, you get heads of departments together to (a) say as an employer they encourage it, and (b) what do you do with people when they come back? Make sure you de-brief them, make sure that you do not perceive them to have any issues that have arisen from their service.

  Q481  Willie Rennie: It sounds quite loose. Is there a need for more?

  Mr Cash: I think there is room for more and I think that is why we have picked this up as an issue in our next phase of work, to really restate that we support this, so we are planning, as I say, to pull people together, probably the human resource directors of various organisations on a regional type basis, to re-emphasise what they need to do.

  Q482  Chairman: I would agree with what Willie Rennie has just said about it sounding quite loose because when I visited Frimley Park people being de-briefed by people who had no experience of military service at all, who just did not understand the sorts of things that people had been through, was an issue and I hope it is something that you will seriously address.

  Derek Twigg: Okay. Can I just say it is obviously our responsibility as well and I think it is in an area where we would look to do more.

  Q483  Mr Holloway: I have found the answers to our questions highly relevant and it is very nice to see such grown-up people in key jobs in all this.

  Derek Twigg: Do you mean all of us?

  Q484  Mr Holloway: Of course, all of you. However, I cannot help feeling that yet again we have got the "everything is absolutely marvellous, wonderful, we have thought of everything" line. We spoke earlier about pre-emption. Obviously, with members of the press sitting around you are not going to give us the precise things that you are working on but there must be areas that you are quite worried about and you are probably quite relieved we have not touched upon. What are they?

  Derek Twigg: To take your general point, I will give you an example—Selly Oak. There is no problem with clinical care or anything like that, but we looked at it and said, "What more can we do in terms of welfare support both for the Service personnel coming in and also for their families?", so we have improved that tremendously. We have talked again about Headley Court and the review about what further we need to do. Everyone says it is excellent and, of course, it is excellent but we are not resting on our laurels but are looking at what further we can do. In terms of mental health, we clearly saw there were issues there. That is why we have introduced the medical assessment programme and why we have gone down the pilots. On the specific issue about Reservists we have just been talking about now coming back individually, and the effect on their mental health compared to the Regular Army, there is another example.

  Q485  Mr Holloway: So we are not going to see headlines in six months' time of the kind that we have had in the past that we have been letting these young men and women down? Is that what you are saying? Is it now broadly sorted? Is the chapter over?

  Derek Twigg: If I could give you a sort of guarantee that there will never be anything go wrong or the press will not—

  Q486  Mr Holloway: I was not asking for that.

  Derek Twigg: I know, but that is what the point is. I think if you look at the way some of these things are reported you would expect there is a systematic breakdown. I think from your own investigations, and certainly our personal experience of some of those people who have to deliver services, that is not the case. Clearly, in terms of veterans, and not least in terms of mental health, there have been gaps and issues there in terms of how we can improve that, and there always will be areas where we can improve, but I do not want to give you a sense or complacency here. There is not, absolutely not.

  Q487  Chairman: Before you move on, something prompted your statement on Friday. Did that statement on Friday imply that there is ongoing work, that it is not settled, that there are still things you will need to be addressing because you are not entirely satisfied that we are in the right place here?

  Derek Twigg: You will know from statements I have made in the House in terms of the pilots and initiatives we are talking about that it is about—well, we announced it, we did it then. Yes, we are not completely satisfied because we want to ensure we get the best possible system. It is not a case of resting on our laurels or resting on the last initiative or the last announcement. It is about moving forward and looking all the time. As the Generals will tell you, there is an absolute commitment ministerially, the same in the Department of Health, to provide the best possible healthcare and support, and we are looking to make that change. I will just give you an example which we have not touched on today but we had it ready to give you, and I think we should do it at this point. One of the things I said to the Surgeon-General when he came to the job was, "How do we know that the health services we are providing are as good as we all think they are and that generally people tell us they are, given the gaps and problems, so how do we measure that?". One of the things we are looking at is having an independent look at the services, to have the Healthcare Commission look at them. That is my answer back to you, that we are prepared to do that. I do not know what that will come out with. I hope it will come up with a very good report but the fact is that I want to make sure we have absolutely the best systems in place.

  Q488  Chairman: David Hamilton has just asked if that is for the whole of the UK.

  Derek Twigg: Yes, and abroad.

  Q489  Mr Hamilton: The reason for asking is that you have the responsibility because Ben Bradshaw does not represent the UK; he represents England. He represents English health authorities; that therefore represents 87 per cent. Derek on the other hand does represent the UK. I raise that question quite genuinely because we have seen the discrepancy in education.

  Derek Twigg: Our services are UK-wide as well.

  Mr Bradshaw: DMS is UK and abroad and I think the Healthcare Commission has already indicated that they would be very happy to undertake a review.

  Lieutenant-General Baxter: The Partnership Board are very keen to get the Chief Medical Officer of Scotland and appropriate people from Ireland and Wales so that when something does come up, and I like to think of myself as a fairly persuasive person, we can say, "Look: what are you going to do about it?", and then if I get no satisfaction—

  Lieutenant-General Lillywhite: I would just like to answer the question do we have any worries and perhaps correct a slight mis-impression that I might have given earlier. Manning still concerns us. We are significantly improving our manning in many areas but we have a workforce that is very junior, that in many cases, particularly in the nursing area, is inexperienced. We still have some way to go to produce the number of specialist nurses, for example, that we want and, although consultants as a whole are improving significantly and have improved significantly over time, there are a couple of areas like general surgeons and general medical practitioners where we do not seem to be having the same improvement as we are having in other areas, so there are still one or two areas that we have not quite got right which we are looking at.

  Q490  Chairman: So if there were any worry that you would put at the top of your list of worries manning would be the one, would it?

  Lieutenant-General Lillywhite: No.

  Q491  Chairman: Then what would?

  Lieutenant-General Lillywhite: What would be top of my list would be to ensure that the quality of care we are producing is as good as we think it is and that is why the Healthcare Commission external audit is an important part of the work.

  Lieutenant-General Baxter: Everything would flow from that.

  Mr Bradshaw: In response to Mr Holloway's question about this terrible phrase "horizon scanning", I think the work programme at the board gives a good indication of where we think the main concerns are, but because of the rapid development of both medical treatment and technology and the rapid changes in military techniques and technology these things are constantly changing and our challenge is to try to stay abreast of the latest developments and deliver, as we have all said, the best healthcare possible.

  Q492  Willie Rennie: Following on from Mr Hamilton's point, will this Commission to check on the quality of the care follow the patient, and if it follows the patient will it make sure that it goes all the way through the system so that it goes from the GP and covers the secondary care, in which case full partnership with the Scottish Government and the Welsh Assembly will be absolutely essential to make sure that works, so that it is not just about your services within the military; it is also about the services across the board. Is that the case?

  Lieutenant-General Lillywhite: I can give you an assurance that we are looking at the care of our casualties wherever they are treated. I expect the Healthcare Commission to assist me in being able to identify whether there is any sub-optimal treatment anywhere that our Servicemen are treated.

  Q493  Mr Hancock: Is it possible as a veteran to get Mr Holloway some priority to have his Blackberry surgically removed as quickly as possible? It should be of some priority.

  Derek Twigg: I shall make sure he gets a veteran's badge.

  Chairman: We are reaching the law of diminishing returns. I think we had better close this evidence session and say thank you very much indeed to both of you, Ministers, and to your teams for some very useful evidence on an exceedingly important subject.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 18 February 2008