Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Memorandum from the Ministry of Defence

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  This memorandum covers the Spring Supplementary Estimate for the Ministry of Defence (MoD). The Department's spending plans for 2007-08 are based upon the outcome of the Government's Spending Review 2004. This Estimates Memorandum should be read in conjunction with the Winter Supplementary Estimate and the Department's Main Estimate (2007-08).

  1.2  The Introduction to the Estimate lists the changes being made since the Winter Supplementary Estimate. This is shown by Request for Resources (RfR)[1] and the section number shown in brackets after the detail for each change is a reference to the line(s) that are affected by the change in Part II of the Estimate.

  1.3  There is a separate Estimates Memorandum for the Armed Forces Retired Pay, Pensions vote.

2.  SUMMARY OF RESOURCES SOUGHT IN THE ESTIMATE

  2.1  The Introduction to the Estimate shows a net increase in Voted DEL resources of £2,473 million from £35,569 million at Winter Supplementary Estimates to £38,042 million. There is an increase in RfR1 (Provision of Defence Capability) resources of £1,447 million, which is primarily due to non-cash resource requirements forecasted by TLBs for depreciation, provisions, and impairments. This is funded from the Department's accumulated End Year Flexibility (EYF) and the draw down of the Department's Unallocated Provision (DUP). The MoD RfR1 Capital (CDEL) net credit of £669 million comprises the £709 milion balance of the receipt from the sale of Chelsea Barracks (credited to AME) offset by £40 million of End Year Flexibility (added to CDEL).

  2.2  The RfR2 (Operations and Peace Keeping)[2] resources net request of £1,023 million is additional funding for military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Balkans and comprises direct resource costs of £599 million and indirect resources of £424 million. The RfR2 capital request of £388 million is mainly for Urgent Operational Requirements (UORs) in Iraq and Afghanistan. Further details are provided at Paragraphs 4 and 5.

  2.3  There is a small additional (outside DEL) request for £3 million resource AME for War Pensions, which reflects the current forecast of outturn.

  2.4  The changes are summarised in the following tables:

Table 1

CHANGES IN RESOURCE AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE



Resource Expenditure £ million
Provision of Defence Capability (RfR1) 1,447.124
Operations and Peace Keeping (RfR2)1,022.500
War Pensions and Allowances (RfR3)3.000
Total Net Request for Resources 2,472.624


Capital Expenditure£ million
Net Provision of Defence Capability (RfR1) (669.000)
Operations and Peace Keeping (RfR2)388.000
Total Net Request for Capital(281.000)


£ million
Total Change in Capital and Resource 2,191.624



  2.5  The total change in the Estimate is £2,191.624 million, which generates an additional net cash requirement of £894.351 million. The cash requirement is analysed in the following table, and a reconciliation between the changes in the Estimate and the net cash requirement is shown in Part II of the Estimate, "Resource to Cash Reconciliation".

Table 2

CHANGE IN VOTED CASH REQUIREMENT



£ million
Near Cash (Voted) in Resource DEL597.750
Near Cash in Capital DEL428.000
AME (Net receipt)(706.000)
Accruals to cash adjustments574.601
Net Cash Requirement894.351


  2.6  The most significant changes to the Defence Expenditure Limits (DEL) at Spring Supplementary Estimates are:

    —  the take up of the Department's End Year Indirect Resource Flexibility totalling £1,622 million to reflect the Department's latest forecast of outturn of Indirect Resource expenditure;

    —  an increase in RfR2 of £566 million Direct Resource DEL and £381 million Capital DEL to reflect the forecast costs of peace keeping operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Balkans;

    —  the transfer of £424 million Indirect Resource DEL from RfR1 to RfR2 to cover depreciation, cost of capital and impairment forecasts in relation to assets deployed on operations;

    —  net transfers in of £39.1 million from other Government Departments under RfR1 and RfR2 (Table 4). The largest are from the FCO for the Balkans operations and the Afghanistan helicopter flight (both RfR2);

    —  the take up of Capital End Year Flexibility (EYF) of £40 million resulting from the sale of QinetiQ in 2005-06, as agreed with the Treasury;

    —  draw down of £200 million from the Department's (Unvoted) Unallocated Resource Provision to reflect the increased (Voted) Indirect Resource DEL forecast of outturn for RfR1;

    —  an increase in AME of £53 million to cover MoD estates revaluation (RfR1) and the latest forecast of outturn for War Pensions (RfR3); and

    —  an increase in Capital AME Non Operating Appropriations-in-Aid of £709 million to recognise the balance of the sales proceeds of Chelsea Barracks which was not provided for in the 2007-08 Main Estimates.

3.  DETAILED EXPLANATION OF CHANGES

  3.1  Part I of the Estimate summarises the changes described above and provides detail about the costs included in each RfR.

  3.2  Part II of the Estimate shows the changes proposed in the Estimate, by Top Level Budget Holder (TLB). This shows the present net position (the position at Winter Supplementary Estimates), the changes in the position, and the new net provision (Spring Supplementary Estimates). Again this is set out by Request for Resources. The transfers and other changes outlined in the Introduction to the Estimate are analysed in this section of the Memorandum.

  3.3  The table below shows how the Spring Supplementary Estimate is compiled, identifying changes since 2007-08 Winter Supplementary Estimates.

Table 3

SHOWING CHANGES TO VOTED RESOURCES AND CAPITAL AT SPRING SUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES


[1] Definitions of the column headings are shown at Annex 1.

[2] Minimal differences may occur due to roundings.

4.  RFR1 PROVISION OF DEFENCE CAPABILITY—EXPLANATION OF CHANGES

Transfers In/Out

  4.1  The Estimate includes two transfers in from Other Government Departments and one transfer out, which are detailed in Table 4.

Table 4

SHOWING TRANSFERS BETWEEN MOD AND OTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS
Transfers OutRfR £m Purpose
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform 1(0.750)MoD share of the management costs of transferred nuclear liabilities.
Transfers In
Foreign and Commonwealth Office2 1.500Contribution to the Global Rest of the World Conflict Prevention pool costs
Foreign and Commonwealth Office2 31.000Contribution to the Balkans Conflict Prevention pool costs.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office2 7.350Capital contribution to the Afghanistan Command and Communications helicopter flight
Total Net Transfers In 39.100

End Year Flexibility: £1,622 million IRDEL; £40 million CDEL

  4.2  The latest forecasts of Indirect Resource spend indicates that the Department needs to utilise its Indirect Resource End Year Flexibility. The increased requirement relates to a range of depreciation provisions and impairment costs.

  4.3  The Department has drawn down the £40 million CDEL available following the sale of its interests in QinetiQ in 2005-06. The staged draw down of the QinetiQ receipt was agreed with Treasury in the 2004 Spending Review.

Transfer of Indirect Resource from RfR1 to RfR2—£424 million

  4.4  The Department requests the transfer of £424 million Indirect Resource DEL from RfR1 to RfR2 to cover cost of capital, depreciation and impairment charges associated with fixed assets purchased under Urgent Operational Requirement arrangements. These are continuing non-cash charges associated with holding these assets and are charged to RfR2 for as long as they are deployed on operations.

Draw Down of the Department Unallocated provision—£200 million

  4.5  The latest Department's forecast of its IRDEL requirement, and taking into account the transfer to RfR2 at para 4.4, indicates a need to draw down £200 million, from its unallocated provision.

Other Changes

Chelsea Receipt

  4.6  £250 million of the £959 million receipt from the sale of Chelsea was included in Main Estimates. The balance of £709 million will be credited to AME as a non-operational Appropriation-in-Aid. £550 million has been included in the Department's CDEL allocation from 2008-09 to 2010-11 in Spending Review 2007 to be spent on service accommodation. The remaining amount will be made available to the MoD in the next Spending Review.

Non Budget Items

  4.7  There are no changes to the Non Budget at the Spring Supplementary Estimate.

AME Items

  4.8  The RfR1 Resource AME increase of £50 million reflects the Department's forecast of the final impact of the 2006-07 Quinquennial Review on fixed asset write offs.

Neutral Transfers

  4.9  The changes under these sub-headings reflect alterations to TLB allocations of Resource and Capital funding to bring the allocations into line with responsibility transfers between TLBs, and other funding adjustments to align TLB provision with forecast outturn without changes to defence outputs.

  4.10  The Operating and Non-Operating Appropriations in Aid changes to the Spring Supplementary Estimate reflect the latest estimate of outturn for each TLB.

  4.11  There are two Grants in Aid recognised in the Spring Supplementary Estimates. The grant in aid of £53.5 million to the Council of Reserve Forces and Cadets Associations is to fund the 13 Regional Reserve Forces and Cadets Associations. The grant in aid has been allocated within the existing provision of Land TLB. The grant in aid of £8.3 million to the Marine Society and Cadets Association aims to educate young people as to the need and role of the Armed Forces and make them aware of the career opportunities that the Services can offer. The grant in aid has been allocated within the existing provision of Fleet TLB.

5.  REQUEST FOR RESOURCES 2: OPERATIONS AND PEACE KEEPING

  5.1  The Spring Supplementary Estimate requests an additional £693 million for peace keeping operations in Iraq and £685 million for peace keeping operations in Afghanistan. This is summarised in Table 5 below, with a more detailed analysis is shown in Table 6. The increase reflects the demands of operations concerned, in particular the need for Urgent Operational Requirements.

Table 5

SUMMARY COST OF OPERATIONS AND PEACE KEEPING CLAIM AT 2007-08 SSE

  5.2  The current estimate for operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Balkans for the 2007-08 Spring Supplementary Estimates is shown in Table 6.

Table 6

The ESTIMATED COST OF OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ AND THE BALKANS AT SSE 2007-08

  5.3  The total conflict prevention request for 2007-08 Spring Supplementary Estimates is set out in Table 7.

Table 7

TOTAL CONFLICT PREVENTION REQUEST FOR 2007-08 SSE

6.  RFR3 WAR PENSION BENEFIT (WPB)

  6.1  Additional funding of £3 million is required to cover outstanding Ghurkha claims for Far Eastern Prisoner of War payments. This will increase the total WPB funding to £1,030 million.

7.  THE DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE LIMIT (DEL)

  7.1  Table 8 shows the DEL from 2005-06 to 2007-08 for all RfRs. The Total DEL is calculated by adding Resource DEL, Capital DEL and deducting depreciation, which forms part of Resource DEL. Depreciation is excluded from Total DEL; including this as well as Capital DEL would be double counting. The figures are for voted and Non-voted DEL; the Non voted DEL figure for 2007-08 is £83.832 million net of depreciation, and this is shown in more detail in the Notes to the Spring Supplementary Estimate.

Table 8

CHANGES TO MOD DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE LIMITS

8.  ADMINISTRATION COSTS LIMIT

  8.1  The Department is not currently subject to an Administration Costs Limit. The MoD will implement an Administration costs regime in 2008-09.

9.  PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

  9.1  Non nuclear provisions have been increased at Spring Supplementary Estimates to reflect planned redundancies in the Central TLB and DE&S resulting from the Department's streamlining strategy.

10.  MACHINERY OF GOVERNMENT CHANGES

  10.1  There are no further Machinery of Government Changes.

11.  IMPACT ON PSA TARGETS

  11.1  The changes in provision sought are not linked to the overall achievement of the Department's PSA targets but rather to enable delivery across the range of outputs in accordance with our plans. A failure to grant the additional RfR2 allocation would undermine the prosecution of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan (PSA 1).

12.  NET ADDITIONAL CASH REQUIREMENT

  12.1  The Net Cash impact for the Spring Supplementary Estimate is an increased requirement of £894.351 million. This is broken down in Table 2.

13.  VOTES A

  13.1  The Department will be laying the 2008-09 Votes A Annual Estimate alongside this 2007-08 Spring Supplementary Estimate. This will be published as HC 264.

A.  DEFINITION OF TERMS

1.   Direct Resource Departmental Expenditure Limits (RDEL)

  This is a control aggregate within the resource budget. It excludes the non-cash items such as depreciation, cost of capital and movement in provisions. Direct Resource DEL is also known as "near cash in the resource budget".

2.   Indirect Resource DEL (IRDEL)

  This covers items such as depreciation, cost of capital charges, movement in provisions, and the notional auditors' fees for the National Audit Office (NAO). This is also known as non-cash.

3.   Total Resource DEL

  This is the sum of Direct and Indirect Resource DEL.

4.   Annually Managed Expenditure (AME)

  Annually Managed Expenditure (AME) includes Programmes that are demand-led, such as War Pensions (RfR3) and exceptionally volatile items that cannot be controlled by the Department. AME also includes Programmes that are so large that the Department could not be expected to absorb the effects of volatility within them, such as cash release of nuclear provisions.

5.   Non-Budget

  Items of expenditure which are included in the Estimate, but are outside of DEL and AME eg Grants in Aid, Royal Hospital Chelsea. This is a Parliamentary control but not a Treasury control.

6.   Total Net Resources

  This is the net of items 1 to 5.

7.   Capital Departmental Expenditure Limit (CDEL)

  This is for new investment, including Capital additions, disposals, and the capital repayment of loans.

8.   Capital AME

  Includes the capital element of the loan repayments for self-financing public corporations, such as QinetiQ.

9.   Total Net Capital

  This is the sum of the above capital items.

10.   Total Near Cash

  This is the total accrued expenditure spend and is the sum of Direct RDEL and Capital DEL.

11.   Request for Resources 1

  Provision of Defence Capability, provides for expenditure primarily to meet the Ministry of Defence's operational support and logistics services costs and the costs of providing the equipment capability required by defence policy.

12.   Request for Resources 2

  Request for Resources 2 provides primarily for the additional costs of peace keeping and operations. These are the net additional costs incurred: the costs that the Department would have incurred regardless of the operation taking place, such as wages and salaries are recorded against RfR1.

13.   Request for Resources 3

  War Pensions and Allowances, etc provides primarily for the payments of pensions and allowances for disablement or death arising out of war or service in the Armed Forces after 2 September 1939, and associated non-cash items.

B: List of Abbreviations used in the Estimate

AMEAnnually Managed Expenditure
DE&SDefence Equipment and Support
DUPDepartmental Unallocated Provision
EYFEnd Year Flexibility
FCOForeign and Commonwealth Office
MoDMinistry of Defence
NAONational Audit Office
RfRRequest for Resources
SSESpring Supplementary Estimates
UKUnited Kingdom
WSEWinter Supplementary Estimates







1   For detail on the different Requests for Resources, see Annex 1. Back

2   Now re-named from Conflict Prevention to Operations and Peace Keeping. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 10 March 2008