Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Further supplementary memorandum from the Ministry of Defence

(i)   The latest position regarding the deficit in UAV operators in the Army (and the Royal Navy and RAF if deficits also exist) (Q 21)

  The Army's UAV operators are provided by 32 Regiment Royal Artillery.[14] The state of manning at any one time only provides a snapshot of a naturally fluid picture. At present, there is a recognised shortfall among trained senior UAV tradesmen (NCOs). Against the previous Phoenix-based establishment, the shortfall of trained senior operators was around 38%. These individuals do not necessarily operate the UAV directly but are responsible for managing their operation. For current operations, using the Hermes 450 system, there is currently no shortfall of qualified personnel (helped partly by the reduced demand for senior operators). The manning establishment of the Regiment has recently been increased in preparation for the entry into service of the Watchkeeper UAV system which is planned to begin towards the end of 2010. If measured against this new establishment, the senior operator shortfall based on current manning levels would be around 70%. Over the next two years the Army will address this situation through normal manning processes, such as extra training courses and transferring personnel from trades where manning levels have been reduced to ensure that the new establishment is met. This is not an unusual situation as an establishment must be changed before extra personnel can be posted to a unit. If necessary, a range of extra measures, including Financial Retention Incentives (FRI), may be used to aid in recruitment and retention (FRI for qualified UAV operators employed in 2007-08 was very successful; it achieved 100% take up rate and guaranteed a three year return of service).

  RAF manning for UAV operations is currently broadly in balance. There is no current requirement for UAV operators in the Royal Navy. 15

  Overall, there is sufficient trained manpower to meet current operational requirements, albeit this has required, as elsewhere, a rebalancing of priorities and breaking harmony guidelines for some individuals.

(ii)   Which branches of the Army personnel have transferred from to become UAV operators (Q 22)

  Personnel from a broad range of other arms and trades across the Army have transferred into the UAV operator trade, moving in at the appropriate level. There has been no particular preponderance of any one arm or trade.

(iii)   The latest position regarding deficits in analysts (in each of the three Services) and the initiatives in place to address the deficits (Qq 32-35)

  The increased use of Full Motion Video (FMV) and the introduction of new collection assets mean that the requirement for analysis across Defence is increasing. This has a consequential effect on the quantity and type of analysts needed. The shift in emphasis is being taken into account in, for example, the reprioritisation of work.

  There is currently a shortfall of around 18% in imagery analysts within the RAF and in the short term this is being addressed through management of training, including the introduction of a new basic course on FMV. For the longer term, the position will continue to be monitored and the Department is developing an overall strategy to make better use of this scarce resource, including work to understand better the recruitment and retention issues and whether the training course structure is right. A recruitment strategy is already being implemented although owing to the training profile this is not expected to provide additional image analysts for around two years. Manning in the other Services is broadly in balance.

  Overall, there is sufficient trained manpower (with use of reserves) to meet current operational requirements but, as in other areas there has been a need to rebalance priorities.

(iv)   The difference between a restricted area (temporary) and a temporary segregated airspace (Qq 81-82)

  The definitions of a "Restricted Area (Temporary)" and "Temporary Segregated Airspace"are given below:

  Restricted Area (Temporary). A Restricted Area is airspace of defined dimensions within which the flight of aircraft is restricted in accordance with certain specified conditions. Restricted Areas established under the regulations contained in the Air Navigation Order may be temporary or permanent; in case of temporary airspace they are designated as Restricted Area (Temporary) or RA(T).

  Temporary Segregated Airspace (TSA). TSA is airspace of defined dimensions which is reserved for the exclusive use of specific users during a determined period of time. TSAs were envisaged as being part of the flexible use of airspace (FUA) concept. However, the full introduction of this will be delayed until International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and European Civil Aviation Community (ECAC) terminology have been aligned. Proposals for the ICAO definition of TSA include the statement "through which other traffic will not be allowed to transit", which effectively removes the flexibility of allowing operators to `share' the airspace when other planned activities are not taking place. There is currently no existing definition for `segregated airspace' within EUROCONTROL or ICAO.

  Comparison of these definitions indicates that the differences are:

    —    A RA(T) is an extant CAA regulation that is in use today, but a TSA is a new regulation that has yet to be implemented.

    —    A RA(T) allows aircraft of all types to use the airspace in accordance with the specified conditions, whereas TSA reserves the airspace for the exclusive use of a certain user.

(v)   Details of who is responsible if a UAV falls out of the sky and causes injury or death (Qq 89-91)

  When compensation claims are received they are considered on the basis of whether or not the Ministry of Defence has a legal liability to pay compensation. Where there is a proven legal liability, compensation is paid. It therefore follows that the Ministry of Defence would compensate anyone suffering a loss in the event of a UAV accident that was caused by the Department's negligence.

2 June 2008

15  The Royal Navy has provided operating personnel as part of the UK contribution to US-UK Combined Joint PREDATOR Task Force.



14   Currently, 47 Regiment Royal Artillery is being temporarily re-roled, a battery at a time dependent on the operational requirement, from close air defence to operate the Desert Hawk mini UAV on current operations. Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 5 August 2008