Select Committee on Innovation, Universities and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum 112

Submission from the Association of Business Schools

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.  For the reasons given below the Association of Business Schools is firmly against the Government's proposal to phase out support to institutions for students studying ELQs.

  2.  The effects of HEFCE's proposals will be felt unequally in institutional and subject terms and there may well be damaging and unintended consequences.

  3.  The list of strategically important and vulnerable subjects (SIVS) is not a meaningful or a fair basis on which to "protect" funding in the ELQ case.

RATIONALE:

  4.  The main reason against the ELQ proposal is that it runs counter to and will undermine the current efforts of Universities and Business Schools to meet Government's existing policy in three significant areas. These are: improving our international competitiveness; the development of lifelong learning and higher level skills in the Leitch proposals and the encouragement by HEFCE to engage more in "third stream" activities. All three require the ability of Universities to offer individuals the chance to acquire new skills and qualifications. In many cases, particularly at Postgraduate level, such qualifications, although very different, will be at an equivalent level to those already held.

  5.  The effects of the proposal will also be felt unequally in institutional and subject terms. We think that business and management studies will be particularly adversely affected and institutions such as the Open University Business School and also those with little or no Foundation degree provision, for example, Cranfield School of Management will be especially penalised. We hope that this is not the intention of the proposals but since it has not been modelled accurately by HEFCE, it would be an unintended and most unfortunate consequence.

  6.  The list of strategically important and vulnerable subjects (SIVS) is not a meaningful or a fair basis on which to "protect" funding in the ELQ case. Firstly, it conflates two very different sets of issues: national importance on the one hand and vulnerability (ie, lack of market demand) on the other. Secondly, it does not include for example, management and leadership development, which the Government itself (via the Council for Excellence in Management & Leadership) has already accepted as being of major strategic importance to improved productivity and international competitiveness.

  Background: The Association currently has 116 business schools in membership across the UK. Collectively, the members represent over 250,000 fte students and over 8,500 fte staff. Business and Management Studies is the most popular subject to study in Universities (1 in 7 of all HE students) and attracts the largest numbers of overseas students.

January 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 27 March 2008