Select Committee on Innovation, Universities and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum 117

Submission from the Council for College and University English

  The Council for College and University English notes with grave concern the proposal to remove funding for ELQs. While at first glance this seems a reasonable and minor adjustment to funding arrangements, which will prevent "perpetual students" from gathering unproductive portfolios of multiple qualifications, it is likely to have a major impact on a crucial sector of the student community: mature students.

  The paradigmatic case here is, not the wastrel collecting degrees, but the mature candidate—frequently a woman—who, having taken a bachelor's degree in their teens, decides in their thirties, perhaps after a period of child-rearing or unsatisfying employment, to make a step change to their careers and to study for a qualification in a new field.

  To close this pathway down, as this proposal will surely do, hits at the heart of the lifelong learning agenda, and runs contrary to all previous statements about the need for Higher Education to reach out to non-standard, otherwise disadvantaged groups. It will also have a disproportionate effect upon those HE institutions that have most energetically taken on-board the Lifelong Learning agenda. It seems, therefore, a thoroughly un-progressive proposal in terms of its implications on grounds of gender, age, class, and culture.

  Given the above, we strongly encourage you to think again about endorsing the proposal.

January 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 27 March 2008