Select Committee on Innovation, Universities and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum 22

Submission from the British Society for Immunology

  I am writing in my capacity as the education secretary and Trustee of the British Society for Immunology. I, together with the trustees and a significant proportion of the membership would like to raise concerns regarding the proposed HEFC cut relating to support for students who have equivalent level qualifications (ELQs). We understand that if a person has already got a degree at a particular level (eg 1st degree) they will receive no further funding for taking courses at this level, even if it is in order to retrain or update skills.

  We and others are concerned that this is in direct contradiction to the government's stated aims of promoting lifelong learning, and keeping skills up to date.

  More importantly, biomedical science, to name one discipline is a subject that moves on so quickly that, skills learnt 15-20 years ago are almost completely redundant now. It is therefore common for students, including immunologists and cell biologists, who have a bioscience degree from some years ago to take level 3 courses in order to update their knowledge and skills. They have no desire to undertake a whole degree, just to keep their science current. It would appear that the fees for such students will treble if the proposals are enacted; a powerful disincentive.

  The British Society for Immunology is concerned about this policy because it will lead to progressive loss of scientific currency. Moreover, it is often senior scientists who are involved in teaching the next generation, so failure to maintain currency has a knock-on effect. Major funding bodies including the Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council recognise the scientific impact also of discipline hopping enabling physicists to apply their skills to biological phenomena; this leads to innovative and multidisciplinary research of the highest impact world wide and often requires re-training.

  We would therefore ask you to consider our concerns about a strategy that seems to undermine the maintenance and development of professional skills.

January 2008






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 27 March 2008