Select Committee on Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum 20

Submission from Association of Electricity Producers

  1.  The Association of Electricity Producers represents electricity generators in the UK. Its membership comprises a wide range of companies using fossil, nuclear and renewable sources of energy to generate electricity. Members have interests and experience in a range of innovative renewable energy technologies including offshore wind, wave, bioenergy and advanced conversion technologies. We are not able to provide evidence relating to photovoltaics, ground source heat pumps, hydrogen and fuel cell technologies, intelligent grid management or energy storage as our members do not have significant interests in these technologies.

  2.  We welcome the opportunity to submit evidence into this inquiry.

THE CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN AND DEPLOYMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES

  3.  A significant proportion of research and development is undertaken informally by companies during the testing and installation of devices and during the day to day operation of the plant. It is not necessarily carried out in dedicated research facilities. Calculating the amount of money spent on such research is very difficult.

OFFSHORE WIND

  4.  Research undertaken by the offshore wind sector has included work to increase the capacity and performance of wind turbines and enabling turbines to be located in deeper waters. There has also been research undertaken to overcome some of the operational difficulties facing the offshore wind industry, notably health and safety and maintenance access issues. Conditions offshore can prevent even minor repairs from being undertaken during winter months. The loss of revenue caused by a turbine being out of operation creates a strong commercial incentive to overcome such problems.

  5.  Recent experience with the development of offshore wind has found that the cost of development is higher than was originally estimated. Similarly the scope for economies of scale has not proved as great as had been estimated. It had been estimated that the cost of offshore wind might fall to as low as £25/MWh.i Such significant cost reductions are now looking unrealistic in the short and medium term. A recent report for the DTIii found that the cost of offshore wind could fall to between £76-94/MWh by 2020.

MARINE POWER

  6.  In the field of wave energy there is a significant amount of research being undertaken on a number of different wave energy devices. At present there is only one device, Pelamis, developed by Ocean Power Delivery, which can be deployed on a commercial scale. Two projects are planned using this technology; Scottish Power's 3MW project off Leith and EON and Ocean Prospect's 5.25MW project off the north Cornwall coast. Both projects will be connected to the grid at sub-sea connections dedicated to marine energy devices. The two sub sea connections are the European Marine Test Centre in Orkney Orkney Test Centre and the Wave Hub off the north Cornwall coast. The use of these sub sea hubs demonstrates the importance of dedicated infrastructure to support the development and testing of new marine renewable energy generating technologies.

  7.  In addition to Pelamis there are approximately seven other technologies being developed to exploit marine renewable energy. It is unlikely that all of these technologies will reach full commercialization. However, it is important that innovative designs and technologies have sufficient opportunity to be tested. Without such opportunity the few technologies which prove successful would not be developed.

BIOENERGY

  8.  Significant research and testing of bioenergy, in particular the use of different biomasses for the generation of electricity is being undertaken within the industry. In many cases testing is undertaken informally, for example by trialing new biomass fuels and overcoming difficulties with their use and handling etc. Such informal research is vital to the increased use of such fuels. However, due to its ad hoc nature it can be overlooked in assessments of more formal research and development.

THE FEASIBILITY, COST, TIMESCALES AND PROGRESS IN COMMERCIALIZING RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES AS WELL AS THEIR RELIABILITY AND ASSOCIATED CARBON FOOTPRINTS

  9.  The cost of carbon emissions is likely to have an increasingly significant impact on the price of electricity in years to come. Increased electricity prices, as would result from increased value of carbon emissions, would help the economic feasibility of offshore wind and other emerging technologies. In the long term this could reduce the amount of support these technologies need from mechanisms such as the Renewables Obligation. However, for offshore wind to be commercially viable without any additional support the price of carbon would have to increase electricity prices considerably.

CARBON FOOTPRINTS

  10.  There have been a number of studies of the carbon footprints or carbon balance of renewable energy technologies. The most recent and perhaps most relevant is that by Themba Technology,iii commissioned by the Department for Trade and Industry as part of its proposals on reforming the Renewables Obligation. The study found that for almost all uses of biomass for electricity generation there was a net positive carbon balance (ie that the emissions associated with the production, transportation and use of the biomass were lower than the associated carbon savings from the generation of electricity). The carbon balance remained positive for imported as well as indigenous sources of biomass. The net carbon balance was most largely positive for waste biomasses as the report included in its calculation the carbon (in the form of methane) that would have been released into the atmosphere had the material been sent to landfill. Whilst this would not necessary be the case for all waste biomasses, it demonstrates the wide range of factors which need to be considered when calculating a carbon balance for any biomass.

  11.  For non-fuel based technologies such as offshore wind, wave and tidal technologies the carbon balance of the technologies is far clearer and simpler to calculate. The production of zero carbon rated electricity from non-fuel based renewable energy technologies would more than compensate for the emissions associated with the production and installation of the turbine equipment. For onshore wind it has been calculated that the energy used in the manufacturing of the equipment would have been produced by the turbine within three to ten months of operation. This means that during its lifetimeiv each wind turbine would produce between 30 and 100 times the energy used in its construction and manufacture.

THE UK GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN FUNDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES AND PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

  12.  There is a clear role for the UK Government in the funding of blue sky research and development for renewable energy technologies. Without Government support the market is unlikely to invest optimally in such early stage research and development. To date Government funding for research and development of technologies has provided the industry with a solid basis of support. Many renewable energy technologies which are currently at the research and development phase could offer significant potential to the market. They could also make a valuable contribution towards the Government's targets for renewable energy and carbon emissions reductions.

  13.  There has been a move in recent years to attempt to fund renewable energy generation technologies through market based mechanisms at earlier stages of their development. Two examples of this are the development of the Marine Supply Obligation in Scotland and the UK Government's proposal to band the Renewables Obligation to give increase support to emerging technologies. The proposal to band the RO will provide enhanced levels of support for emerging technologies. This will help progress towards commercial viability post demonstration technologies where the basic technology is proven. However, there will continue to be a need for direct Government support for technologies at the pre-demonstration stage. If the Government attempted to support technologies at earlier stages of development in this way it could have a highly damaging effect on the development of new technologies.

OTHER POSSIBLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION

  14.  The Association is not aware of any specific new technologies which are likely to come forward as it deals primarily with those technologies which are past the research and development stage. New renewable energy technologies will, however, undoubtedly come forward in future.

  15.  The Association would be pleased to discuss further any of the comments made in this evidence.

REFERENCES

  (i)  PIU Report, 2002.

  (ii)  Impact of banding the Renewables Obligation—Costs of electricity production, April 2007, Ernst and Young.

  (iii)  Themba Technology, September 2006.

  (iv)  Lifetime of a turbine assumed to be 25 years.

July 2007





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 19 June 2008