Select Committee on Innovation, Universities and Skills Second Special Report


Appendix: Government response


The Government is pleased to respond to those recommendations addressed to it in the House of Commons Science & Technology Select Committee's 'Last Report'.

Inclusion of science in titles

Recommendation 1. We urge the Government to change the title of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills to include the word 'science' to reflect the importance of science within Government. (Paragraph 5)

The Government recognises the desire of the committee to see the role of Science in the title of the department. However the Government feels that a change of name after 6 months would not represent an acceptable use of public funds. The Government is deeply committed to promoting the role of science and it plays a central role in the new department, and has featured strongly in the recent Comprehensive Spending Review; over the CSR07 period spending on the public science base will rise by an annual average rate of 2.5 per cent in real terms to £6.3 billion by 2010-11.

Recommendation 2. In order to reflect accurately the remit of the new committee, we recommend that the Leader of the House bring forward Standing Order changes to change the name of the Innovation, Universities and Skills Select Committee to include the word 'science'. (Paragraph 7)

In respect of the nomenclature of the Committee, the Government recognises that there has not always been a precise match between departmental names and committee names. While it clearly would not be helpful in maintaining the clarity of the departmentally-related committee structure if significant divergences were to emerge, there may be a particular case for highlighting the significance of science issues within the IUS Committee's activities. The Government would be willing to table the necessary motion if the Innovation, Universities and Skills Committee were to indicate that it supports the request.

Future science scrutiny in the Commons

Recommendation 9. We believe that in the long term a separate Science and Technology Committee is the only way to guarantee a permanent focus on science across Government within the select committee system. We recommend that the House be given an opportunity to revisit the question of science scrutiny in the Commons at the end of session 2007-08. (Paragraph 38)

The Government recognises that the question of whether there should be a separate select committee for science and technology will remain a matter of interest. The Government considers that the decision reached by the House in July, to establish the new Innovation, Universities and Skills Committee, with full responsibility for monitoring the work of the whole range of the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills' activities, was the right one. The Government will of course consider fully any future recommendations from the IUS Committee or any other source, but it would not be appropriate at this stage to give an undertaking to review the issue in the House.

January 2008


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 24 January 2008